Search

BrowserAudit has less warnings for my Firefox setup vs. out of the box Tor Browser
I just downloaded Tor browser (which is a configured Firefox browser BTW) using the torbrowser-launcher that automatically downloads and manages the browser. And I thought for funs sake, checking and comparing some tests from browseraudit against my current personal Firefox setup. And to my surprise I got more warnings with Tor Browser v14.5 (based on Mozilla Firefox 128.9.0esr) vs My personal setup of Firefox Browser v137.0.2 (custom configurations and plugins installed). Both at the most up to date version in their official version.
I just found this interesting and wanted to share with you.
Tor Browser

My Firefox Browser

Permanently Deleted

Yes, Mozilla makes enough from search engine royalties to perform its original mission. But it got too much money from those royalties and bloated itself into a lumbering hydra.
In my humble but correct opinion, Mozilla should be doing two things and two things only:
- Building THE reference implementation web browser, and
- Being a jugular-snapping attack dog on standards committees.
- There is no 3.
Permanently Deleted

In my humble but correct opinion, Mozilla should be doing two things and two things only:
- Building THE reference implementation web browser, and
- Being a jugular-snapping attack dog on standards committees.
- There is no 3.
Permanently Deleted
By all accounts, this sucks.
I tried the link preview feature on a link to the English Wikipedia article about Touhou Project, and the LLM's key points are just hilariously bad. For some reason it's focusing too much on the PS4 and Nintendo Switch (which the LLM "thinks" were both released on August 15, 1997). I have a screenshot 6 days ago when it wasn't a Firefox Labs feature yet in my Misskey:
https://makai.chaotic.ninja/notes/a6d86p8n26
Tried it today in an updated Nightly and the key points are still the same lol.
Permanently Deleted
hey @[email protected], here's a hint: you don't have to use it ;)
After the captcha after one page for usename, reload click again select again login credentials another page load
and final insult

No Chinese works as well as any other language for the actual translation. Here is the example link:

I have found the same issue for various European languages. It's just today I was trying to read some Chinese stuff so that's the example I picked.
I can't manage to find a list of currently supported languages from Mozilla though certainly there must be one. It seems like some Asian languages were added to the non-mainline releases earlier this year. I am using Developer on linux and it has way more languages than the original 10 or so Translations rolled out with. I also see Japanese, Greek, Arabic, Korean and a few Cyrillics in there using non-latin alphabets. So they seem to have overcome whatever the barrier was. :)
I don't know why Mozilla is shy of promoting this feature; it's so killer.

firefox translation doesn't appear on many pages
I find Firefox Translator doesn't pick up a lot of pages. The location bar button doesn't appear.
It works if I access via the hamburger menu. It is very slow to have to go via the menu for each individual page. I find no shortcut key or anything.
Sometimes this will correctly guess the original language but often not. It is saying pages are English even when they have little to no english, even using different alphabets.
Is there something the website admins can do to tell firefox what language it is? Encoding? Meta tag?
Can I force the location-bar translate button to persist on all pages regardless of what language it thinks the page is in? Then I could save going through the menu.
Here is an example: https://cn.chinadaily.com.cn/

you disallow access to your website
I do. Any legit visitor is free to roam around. I keep the baddies away, like if I were using a firewall. You do use a firewall, right?
when the user agent is a little unusual
Nope. I disallow them when the user agent is very obviously fake. Noone in 2025 is going to browse the web with "Firefox 3.8pre5", or "Mozilla/4.0", or a decade old Opera, or Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0. None of those would be able to connect anyway, because they do not support modern TLS ciphers required. The rest are similarly unrealistic.
nepenthes. make them regret it
What do you think happens when a bad agent is caught by my rules? They end up in an infinite maze of garbage, much like the one generated by nepenthes. I use my own generator (iocaine), for reasons, but it is very similar to nepenthes. But... I'm puzzled now. Just a few lines above, you argued that I am disallowing access to my website, and now you're telling me to use an infinite maze of garbage to serve them instead?
That is precisely what I am doing.
By the way, nepenthes/iocaine/etc alone does not do jack shit against these sketchy agents. I can guide them into the maze, but as long as they can access content outside of it, they'll keep bombarding my backend, and will keep training on my work. There are two ways to stop them: passive identification, like my sketchy agents ruleset, or proof-of-work solutions like Anubis. Anubis has the huge downside that it is very disruptive to legit visitors. So I'm choosing the lesser evil.
User agents that /look/ legit, but the chances of someone using them /today/ is highly unlikely.
I hope I'll never need to deal with websites administered by you. This is way overboard.
Sajnos az esélye nem olyan kicsi mint azt szeretném.

I wonder if the preview does a pre-fetch which can be identified as such? As in, I wonder if I'd be able to serve garbage for the AI summarizer, but the regular content to normal views. Guess I'll have to check!
Update: It looks like it sends an X-Firefox-Ai: 1
header. Cool. I can catch that, and deal with it.

It's for fedora but maybe this link could help : https://fostips.com/hardware-acceleration-video-fedora/?amp=1
It did for me. I replaced mesa drivers for my amd card.
According to fastfetch it's a "Intel Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd gen core processor"
When I tried to run "LIBVA_DRIVER_NAME=i965 firefox" it spat out "restorecon: SELinux: Could not get canonical path for /home/[myusername]/.mozilla/firefox//gmp-widevinecdm/ restorecon: No such file or directory."
I sure you have but have you tried checking the out put of vainfo
Arch wiki since Firefox only supports Hardware acceleration with VA-API.
Firefox Hardware video acceleration
If hardware video acceleration is blocked with error code FEATURE_HARDWARE_VIDEO_DECODING_DISABLE or FEATURE_FAILURE_VIDEO_DECODING_TEST_FAILED in about:support, you can override it with media.hardware-video-decoding.force-enabled=true. See [10] for more information. Alternatively, you can install firefox-vaapiAUR.
Also make sure that in about:support
Compositing
in the Features table under Graphics is set to WebRender
if it is not than set gfx.webrender.all
in about:config
to true
.
I had the same issue but I have a NVIDIA gpu. but I just had to install libva-nvidia-driver and edit Kernel parameters and Environment Variables . I got this to work with both Firefox and Librewolf but only some video codecs.
note i have 1080ti so i don't have hardware acceleration for av1. also the only time a problem when I turn off hardware decdoing on firefox is when I watch a HEVC stream on twitch for some reason i get drop frames every second.
Firefox V137.0 Linux
Codec Name | Software Decoding | Hardware Decoding |
---|---|---|
H264 | Supported | Supported |
VP9 | Supported | Supported |
VP8 | Supported | Unsupported |
AV1 | Supported | Unsupported |
HEVC | Supported | Supported |
AAC | Supported | Unsupported |
MP3 | Supported | Unsupported |
Opus | Supported | Unsupported |
Vorbis | Supported | Unsupported |
FLAC | Supported | Unsupported |
Wave | Supported | Unsupported |
Librewolf V136.0.4 (HEVC decoding is only add support on Firefox 137.0 on linux)
Codec Name | Software Decoding | Hardware Decoding |
---|---|---|
H264 | Supported | Supported |
VP9 | Supported | Supported |
VP8 | Supported | Unsupported |
AV1 | Supported | Unsupported |
HEVC | Unsupported | Unsupported |
AAC | Supported | Unsupported |
MP3 | Supported | Unsupported |
Opus | Supported | Unsupported |
Vorbis | Supported | Unsupported |
FLAC | Supported | Unsupported |
Wave | Supported | Unsupported |
Permanently Deleted
Brave is open source.


about:config these flags

@[email protected] was dead right in their comment here - you can escape out of the search by tapping Esc twice, at which point you're back to the URL. Panic over!
Thunderbird and Firefox are developed by separate companies (both under the Mozilla Foundation). Thunderbird is funded through donations. Firefox is funded through (among other sources, such as Pocket and advertisements) the Google search deal. As far as I know it's not legally feasible (or even possible) for the Firefox money to go to Thunderbird or vice versa.
I'm on Linux as well, so that's probably not it. But I just checked the release notes, and it does say:
This feature is part of a progressive roll out.
What is a progressive roll out? Certain new Firefox features are released gradually. This means some users will see the feature before everyone does. This approach helps to get early feedback to catch bugs and improve behavior quickly, meaning more Firefox users overall have a better experience.
So hopefully you'll get it soon!

I don't have that option. Maybe I misunderstand here something. I am on Linux, maybe it does not work here?


sure, it's panorama tab groups.

Picture-in-picture hotkey not working in Linux?
Edit: I found it it occurred somehow when remapping modifiers with my keyd configuration. I remapped it to CTRL ALT ]
and it works now.
It says on https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/about-picture-picture-firefox#w_keyboard-shortcuts that the hotkey to toggle PiP is CTRL Shift ]. When I play a video it shows the PiP button, but the hotkey doesn't work. The other PiP keys like seeking and volume work. I'm on Fedora 41 with KDE 6.3.3 & Wayland.

The annoying fullscreen/Linux bug
This bug is driving me crazy. Watching videos in fullscreen does not inhibit the screensaver/sleep settings on Linux. Whenever I try to stream a movie in fullscreen, my screensaver kicks in at the appointed time, as if I'm just idle.
This bug has been around forever. This seems to be the active entry on Bugzilla.
I LOVE Firefox, and it's a great browser for using on my Linux HTPC. For my purposes, it's much better than Brave. But you know which browser doesn't have this problem on Linux? I'm sorry to say... it's Brave.
I've tried different versions of Firefox: Flatpak, ESR, Trunk. They all have the same problem. When I open them from nothing, they often work great. I can watch a movie fine. But then I close out the movi

Install Chrome extensions in Firefox with CRX Viewer
Crossposted from https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/1jd5nlk/convert_chrome_extension_to_firefox_addon/
There are a number of FF versions and forks that this will work with, but I used FF Beta (I've also confirmed it to work with FF Nightly & Iceraven. Conversely, it did not work for Mull and iirc, it cannot be done using FF Standard Release/Stable)
• Step 1 - have the CRX file for the Chrome extension handy. There are countless Chrome extensions and FF add-ons that will extract it for you.
• Step 2 - install the CRX Installer add-on (or get the XPI file by whatever means) →Extensions→Click CRX Installer→click "Browse"→ select the CRX file*
, which should result in the creation of an XPI file.
• Step 3 - go to Settings→About Firefox Beta (or Nightly, Iceraven, etc)→Tap the logo at the top of the "About" section until you see a toast message saying "Debug Menu enabled" (I think 5 taps)
• Step 4 - navigate to "

How to EASILY disable on-tab-buttons ?

This is what I mean
I found these answers, this is WAY too hard.
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1341555
https://old.reddit.com/r/FirefoxCSS/comments/p485un/how_to_disable_the_audio_playing_icon/
Is there an easier solution ? To turn off these play/pause/mute button that I keep click on accidentally ? I already have good controls with "Find sound tab" audio addon and I don't need this

Votes Wanted: Proposal to allow 2 sidebars (one for tabs, one for extensions)

I really like the sidebar, and I think vertical tabs are amazing, even though really new. I want to make a lot of extensions like "side view" that open a website as a sidebar popup, for example a dictionary. This would be really useful. But currently the vertical tabs are in the same sidebar, so a s...

ℹ️ Edit
come on guys. 30 likes, 14 people gave a kudo? What kinda like is that? "Cool bro but not gonna make an account lol" IF YOU WANT THIS, GIVE IT A REAL LIKE
If you want, vote for my proposal to allow 2 sidebars in Firefox!
Firefox gets vertical tabs and a sidebar, cool huh? And you can open pages as sidebar popups, for example a small dictionary page, or a notepad or whatever else!
But when using vertical tabs and these site popups, it looks pretty ugly and pushes the main site to the edge.
Having a sidebar and a vertical tab bar would fix this.
Current state and mockup as images attached.
This is how it currently is: the sidebar and the vertical tab bar are the same. Placed extensions are unintuitive and popup windows (like Mozillas SideView or dedicated extensions) are next to the tabs, pushing the main website even further to the side

A curated list of Mozilla’s founder’s thoughts on Mozilla & Firefox


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamie_Zawinski
Date | Post |
---|---|
2013-10-02 | W3C green-lights adding DRM to the Web's standards |
2020-09-23 | This is a pretty dire assessment of Mozilla |
2022-01-06 | Mozilla blinked |
2023-12-29 | Remember when Mozilla made a web browser? |
2024-01-05 | My dinosaur just threw up in its mouth a little |
2024-06-20 | Mozilla is an advertising company now |
2024-06-22 | Mozilla's Original Sin |
2024-10-03 | [Mozilla's C |

What's with all the hatred that Firefox has been getting lately?
cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/7131235
Look at this chud video here.
It's just complaining about DEI, but why now? Apparently, Firefox has a "license" to all your data now. How much is that true? Is he just cherry-picking here, in this case? Librewolf or whatever it's called might be a better option. There's also Zen browser.
I got this in my YouTube feed and didn't know it was more anti-DEI slop and now I'm not sure what to believe. Wish they didn't have to make it so political like they accuse others of doing. Ah well. But what is this I hear about Firefox having a "license" to all your data?
I guess that's like a lot of browsers, tbh, but I suppose Firefox has higher standards, or did...

RESOLVED (sekim) in Fenix - Browser Engine. Last updated 2025-03-03.
cross-posted from: https://lazysoci.al/post/22508106
DNS over HTTPS has been shipped for Firefox for Android Nightly

packages.mozilla.org: repo-signing-key.gpg
Hi there,
I wanted to migrate from the default Ubuntu Firefox snap installation to a deb-package-based one using the instructions on the official help site.
I do not just import keys without examining them first, so I had a look at the key from packages.mozilla.org:
undefined
pub rsa2048/C0BA5CE6DC6315A3 created: 2021-05-04 expires: never usage: SC trust: unknown validity: unknown [ unknown] (1). Artifact Registry Repository Signer <[email protected]>
Now, what I don't understand is the identity containing a reference to Google instead Mozilla: "Artifact Registry Repository Signer [email protected]"
Could somebody help me understand that?
Thanks a lot in advance!

Firefox ForkServer Getting Ready To Enhance Linux Browser Performance


How to change the size of shortcut image in new tab page without css
since last update, my image of shortcut, in new tab page, are super tiny.
I though it was to allow to add more row or something, but no. Just tiny images.
Can I change the size of the image without css? Or should I wear glass
FINAL EDIT: Finally following the instruction on my bug report, I created a new profile with about: profiles, then Make my normal profile "default" again.. and setting variantA and B to false stick. No longer tiny shortcut.
EDIT 5: seems this monstuosity will be corrected soon : https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/defalut-tab-shortcut-feedback/m-p/86145/highlight/true#M32956
EDIT 4: reported the bug :https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1947401
EDIT:
> browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.newtabLayouts.variant a and b to false.
Unfortunatly the variant get back to true randomly after some time
EDIT2: you need to opt out of some study it seems : https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-134-new-tab/m-p/83021/highlight/true
E

Mozilla Fakespot - An AI Deepfake Detector

Fakespot spots, analyzes and identifies fake reviews and counterfeits - helping you out when buying stuff online.

Warning! This may be collecting data for advertising. From the Privacy Policy:
We may use personal information to tailor and provide you with content and advertisements. We may provide you with these materials as permitted by applicable law.
Some of the ways we may market to you include email campaigns, custom audiences advertising, and “personalized advertising” or “targeted advertising,” including through cross-device tracking.
If you have any questions about our marketing practices or if you would like to opt out of the use of your personal information for marketing purposes, you may contact us at any time as set forth in "Contact Us" below.

How can I use local LLM in the firefox AI chatbot
Today I saw the AI chatbot in the sidebar for the first time (I remember turning the setting of in the Labs settings, but they turned it on IG). Looking the options, it supports a number of models, but all of them seems to be on a remote servers. Is there any way to use an LLM run on my own machine?

Reminder: Firefox has a good and privacy respecting local language translation of webpages builtin
I just recommended someone to use Firefox for its excellent translation capability. And I think my reply warrants an entire post, so here is a copy of my reply. This is just a reminder that you can visit websites with other languages too. However Japanese and Korean are not supported yet, which would be helpful for me. Hopefully they add the support soon. But for German in example it works:
You could use a translation tool, for something that looks interesting to you. At least Firefox makes this easy, with its builtin translation functionality (without Google as far as I understand, and I think local/offline only, but can be wrong). Firefox is my main way to interact with Lemmy:
Directly in the addressbar for non native languages:

Or through menu:

Mozilla Settles Case Over Its Refusal to Hire Labor Activist
I edited the title to switch Apple with Labor because that's the real gist of the news item, not that they had worked and organised at Apple, although that's no small part.
I'm not sure if this paywalled so here is a archive.today link in case it is.

How to create bookmarks using javascript ?
I tried creating a single bookmark with search word But I can't get this to work. How can I bypass security to make it work ? Do I really have to enable debug mode ? Is it possible to switch debug mode without having to restart the browser (and discard all tabs)
Here is the code I tried
undefined
javascript:(async()=>{let t="S",n="GPT Classic",u="https://chatgpt.com/g/g-YyyyMT9XH-chatgpt-classic/?q=%25s",k="cc",g=(await PlacesUtils.bookmarks.search({parentGuid:PlacesUtils.bookmarks.toolbarGuid,title:t}))[0]?.guid||(await PlacesUtils.bookmarks.insert({parentGuid:PlacesUtils.bookmarks.toolbarGuid,title:t,type:PlacesUtils.bookmarks.TYPE_FOLDER})).guid;await PlacesUtils.bookmarks.insert({parentGuid:g,title:n,url:u}),await PlacesUtils.keywords.insert({keyword:k,url:u}),alert(`Bookmark "${n}" added to folder "${t}" with keyword "${k}"!`)})();

Join Mozilla in testing the new Firefox address bar!
Crossposted from a community manager's post: https://reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/1hwd6u7/join_mozilla_to_test_the_new_firefox_address_bar/
Hi r/firefox 👋,
The address bar is one of the most prominent areas in any browser, and Firefox is no exception. Understanding its importance, the Firefox team has been working on a set of complementary features designed to improve discoverability and security of the Firefox address bar.
With this set of features landing in Firefox Beta 135, we need your expertise to help us test these enhancements by participating in this campaign, which will be live on January 9th!
The top 5 contributors will each receive a $50 voucher to shop at Mozilla’s swag stores as a thank-you for your efforts.
Have any questions about this campaign? Join us on Matrix or comment down below!

Phoenix is a suite of configurations & advanced modifications for Mozilla Firefox, designed to put the user first - with a focus on privacy, security, freedom, & usability. - GitHub - cele...
Disclaimer: I'm not affiliated to the project.
Aside from the fact that it's relatively new and unknown, does this hold a candle to other Firefox-based projects? They seem to be competent by their own comparison tables.
Has anyone got any first-hand experience?