Thank you for reminding me of existence of this network. Have they already joined fediverse as they promised?

To be successful, Firefox should not only try to keep up with the competition, but also offer some unique features that would attract new users.

I agree that LLMs are overhyped, but in my opinion they are quite good at summarising text. We all hate clickbait titles, and this feature has the potential to actually combat them. And what's unique about Firefox's approach is that it's truly private. No other browser offers this.

hey @[email protected], here's a hint: you don't have to use it ;)

Extension members seems promising, but the way they are implemented seem kind of strange to me. I still need to create a static class to declare extension? Why not just get rid of class and declare extensions as "standalone" elements?

Pretty good article, went into some technical stuff, which surprised me as in Linux world I'm used to articles discussing changes in wallpapers between different distro releases :D

What is this

Wow, have they just realised that not every single thing computers do is actually useful to anyone? I think screens that show things when nobody's looking cost a lot more on a global scale.

Naah, boring

So... the US government doesn't have to fund it anymore? So that is an advantage for them in this situation, what is the disadvantage? Or was that their goal all along?

It reportedly works entirely on your machine (as it meant to be privacy preserving by default). So it will probably see only the data you can see.

Maybe because it is, an article says later "Saltiness aside" 😏

Forgejo is such a terrible name 🙄

This should also be part of git repo (but maybe not downloaded through typical git clone as it might be too large though). Has developers of git ever considered doing this?

Is talking on Lemmy ok?

Can anyone ELI5 why it's bad? Apart from contributior being Microsoft

Imagine a website showing a weather forecast. Maintainers of this page are running a webserver and a service that analyse raw meteorological data to calculate tomorrow's weather. In exchange they are making money out of ads.

Now there is an AI agent that enters that page on behalf of user, gets the forecast and show it back to user. User never sees an ad, maintainer never sees his revenue. How is that not stealing?

But it's still possible, right? It's just a matter of doing something in one second versus several?

On the one hand this is good news, because by allowing stealing data from websites we would just financially kill those who produce legitimate data (e.g. news sites having articles stolen without receiving ad revenue as only bots visit them).

On the other hand - AI tools will get dumber, which makes me sad because I personally hoped for having one day a supercharged assistant that reads and summarises Internet for me. Tools like Perplexity creating research on given topics looked very promising

Can someone explain to me, a person that did not have any Apple device ever, what do they mean by:

easier device set-up (e.g. pairing).

So you could not pair non-apple device with your Apple device? And seriously no smartwatch could work with iPhone other than Apple Watch?

If it wasn't for Spotify, I wouldn't know most of the artists I listen to now. They might receive little money from me listening to them, but it's still more than they would receive if I didn't knew about their existence.