Search

I keep getting this error in element

MatrixError: [403] You do not belong to any of the required rooms/spaces to join this room. (https://matrix.org/_matrix/client/v3/join/%23librewolf%3Amatrix.org?server_name=matrix.org&via=matrix.org)

Anybody else?

Does anyone know if anything changed with the new tab settings?

I used to have this custom userContent.css to add more columns to topSites described below, but it is no longer working after I updated :/

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1430289

folder named "chrome" and file named "userContent.css" are still there

 undefined

    
@-moz-document url(about:home), url(about:newtab) {
  @media (min-width: 1800px) {
    .ds-outer-wrapper-breakpoint-override main {
      width: 1700px !important;
    }
  }
}

  

edit: If anyone has any suggestions to add more columns to topSites, let me know edit2: solved

I was able to change the new tab favicon on LibreWolf with CSS:

/newtab favicon/ .tab-icon-image[src="chrome://branding/content/icon32.png"] { content: url("librewolf-NO8X71.png") !important; }

But I'd also like to be able to change the logo that appears on the "about:logo" page (looks like lemmy.world's CSS page is locked for now, so I'm asking here). Anyone know how to do this?

I kiped the logo from LibreWolf's reddit page, it's by u/NO8X71; tell me it's not the coolest thing you've ever seen! Wish I'd done it.

Was wondering why no new messages turned up, since tuesday or something. Turned out the Librewolf Matrix room is changed / upgraded or something like that. It involves joining once again. But both in Element and Fluffy clients I get this error:

MatrixError: [403] You do not belong to any of the required rooms/spaces to join this room. (https://matrix-client.matrix.org/_matrix/client/v3/join/!AMixpitUKQHatikSri%3Amatrix.org?server_name=matrix.org&server_name=envs.net&server_name=fedora.im&via=matrix.org&via=envs.net&via=fedora.im)

Is there a way to join the matrix chat room one again?

I do see the space with the 3 rooms.

In 2022, Mozilla replaced their performance analysis tool (screenshot source) with an externally dependent tool called "Firefox Profiler". It is not integrated in Firefox but depends on an external web app, which is bad.

Please bring back the original "Performance" tool in the developer tools.

Ideally, it would be nice if the list of website exceptions to Enhanced Tracking Protection was synced to the Mozilla account, but an alternative would be the ability to export and import your list once it's established. This would be handy for using Librewolf across multiple devices or if you need to do a fresh install.

Background: I use profiles frequently to separate work, home and other things. In some profiles I use other DRM and fingerprint settings etc Also I switched from installing from flathub to manual (https://librewolf.net/installation/debian/)

Issue: Since a couple of weeks, some profiles dont start. Choosing them will amount to nothing. Librewolf doesnt start, not in the background nor in the foreground. Choosing another profile and after that, the intended one sometimes works around the issue.

Research:

The installs.ini shows the default profile TWO times:

[AA67A15BF0F93AE3] Default=Thuis Locked=1

[6C4726F70D182CF7] Default=Thuis Locked=1

Both installs are also mentioned in profiles.ini.

Question:

• Is having 2 install entries the cause? Because the profilemanager doesnt know what to do?
• Should I remove one of them but which? Opening the /.librewolf/Thuis profile doesnt give information which one is in use. Or I dont know where to look. Assuming this will he

Hi, recent firefox refugee here, and I'm trying to figure out how to get webgl fully working. I already disabled webgl.disabled in about:config, and that seems to have done the trick for most webgl content.

However, the site noclip.website doesn't work. It's basically a 3D model viewer for game maps, and all I get is a black screen. This site works fine in Firefox on this same machine.

I'm using LibreWorld 135.0.1-1 Flatpak on Linux

Thanks!

EDIT:

Here are the log messages in the console. No errors, just a bunch of WebGL warnings:

 undefined

    
Object { root: {…} }
 
Object { gobj: (61) […] }
101.7935fc8f.js:3678:20568
Unimplemented object 016a 5 101.7935fc8f.js:3678:19280
WebGL warning: texStorage(Multisample)?: Requested size at this level is unsupported. 4
WebGL warning: clearBufferu?[fi]v: Framebuffer not complete. (status: 0x8cd6) COLOR_ATTACHMENT0: Attachment has no width or height.
WebGL warning: clearBufferu?[fi]v: Framebuffer must be complete.
WebGL warning: clearBufferu?[fi]v: F
  

I like when I can talk to the folks who design the tools I'm using. Thanks for being here!

@linuxmint ✅
@GrapheneOS ✅
@signalapp ✅
@keepassxc ✅
@Mojeek ✅
@mullvadnet. ✅
@Tutanota ✅
@librewolf ✅

Hi all

Trying to make a switch over to librewolf, but currently the "most mission critical issue" is that I can't seemingly force the PiP -videoplayer to stay on top of all other windows.

My kwin window rule is essentially identical, apart from window class, to the old one I used with Firefox - and that one worked just fine. Not sure if kwin, librewolf or user id10t issue.

But if anyone has thoughts or pointers about this, please share!

the settings as they are now:

edit: I absolutely hate this. IMMEDIATELY after posting I tinkered a bit and turns out "Match whole window class" = Yes -setting was the thing. It works now. DERRRRP.

So in case anyone else stumbles on the same issue, check that setting.

Since I've been mostly using #LibreWolf @librewolf and Tor Browser @torproject anyway, and almost never plain #Firefox, it wasn't a big deal to say goodbye and to delete Firefox from all devices today.

The new "Terms of Use" and the modified privacy notice have crossed a red line, I do no longer give Mozilla the benefit of doubt.

Brief and good summary of Mozilla's changes by @sarahjamielewis:

https://mastodon.social/@sarahjamielewis/114072293410465140

TBH I have no idea why somebody would so persistently and patiently work on discrediting and sinking their own flagship.

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/17370625

I've been a user of Librewolf for a about a year now, and it's always served me pretty well as a nice easy way to get a hardened Arkenfox Firefox.

However, recently I was curious why Librewolf wasn't recommended on PrivacyGuides, and took a look through their reasoning on their forum. That thread spans multiple years, and for the most part I thought their reasons for not including it were a bit unfair, especially after Librewolf started offering automatic updates.

But towards the end of that thread in October, a Privacy guide team member posted a link to the Arkenfox github issue tracker, where a Librewolf team member reveals how the project appeared to have lost steam after a critical member left, and they are [struggling to keep it up to date](https://github.com/arkenfo

I hope not. Add-on signing is a glorified backdoor. Not only does it let Mozilla remotely disable extensions, but in future, governments can force Mozilla to censor unwanted extensions.

In addition, it is a privacy violation, since Mozilla can see who has installed which add-on.

[…] when Firefox contacts Mozilla servers to verify if Mozilla approved each extension, it discloses to Mozilla which extensions are in use. So in addition to being a backdoor by definition, it is a severe privacy violation as well. This comes from an organization that perpetually claims to champion user freedom and privacy.

(source: change.org)

And let's not forget about a certain May 2019 incident:

all Firefox addons have been disabled due to an expired certificate. And so, people got silently hit with stuff like this when turning their "private and secure" browser on. It was only a matter of time until Mo