Skip Navigation

Posts
16
Comments
42
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Sorry for the delay in the response.

    Thank you :)

    Your welcome 💐

    1. What I meant by that question was rather “what’s the design vision?” Is the intended usage more like everyone should have their own, or rather those should be shared with more people (to lump up different topics originating from the same machine)

    The design vision for the websurfx engine is to protect user's privacy, and to have a really secure and fast search engine along with that also provide a really customizable, safe (like the level of protection you want for the safe search to go even allowing you to use filter lists to filter out specific websites from the search results), highly theme-able, and with organic and ad-free search results. So that the user can get a search engine which is entirely their own.

    And for the case whether you should self-host it or use an instance of it depends on your threat level. Like many people because of your threat model may prefer self-hosting as they may not want to have their data served from a computer that is not their own.

  • Sorry, for the delay in the response.

    Do you have the useragentstring.com website blocked by anything? Like using nextdns or filter lists of any sort. 😅

    It needs to contact this website to get the random user agent string to spoof the user agent string of the user's search query to protect the user's privacy (that's why it is important.).

  • Yes, adding multiple options other then dockerhub was quite necessary because the current limitations of dockerhub makes it very troubling for the users to pull the image at their side like you know docker recently have added rate limits on image pulls for those users who haven't authorized/signed up with them.

  • Thanks ❤ for taking a look at our project, if you need any help then ask them here or DM me. I would be very glad to help. 😊

  • Yes, sure, no problem, I will answer all you questions one by one:

    1. Yes, that's how it works at high POV but also in a privacy oriented similar to searxng (so only your IP address is shared with the upstream engine but you can spoof that using VPN or by using the proxy feature in websurfx). Additionally we also rerank the search results after fetching search results from the upstream engines, to make it more organic (though, we admit not the best but contributions will help us alot in that area for sure. 😅 )

    2. No, currently no, but you can open a feature request issue about it at our project here.

    3. Yes, it is stored as a config, cookie and also you can export the cookie from the UI and then import it again (this can be useful if you change browser or clear cookies for some reason).

    4. Yes, I explained about it and how to get around with it in the first point. 😅

    5. I think it is better to self-host then depend on like an instance because you still have many privacy issues with VPSs (because it is still someone else's computer), but we do provide privacy enhancing features like encypting cache results which can help in evading the VPS from spying your/users search results in the cache.

    6. Not really, as far as I know they don't block on the basis of that their ads not being displayed but yes there is still a chance that you could flagged by some engines because they want users to use their search engines because they do want to sell the user as their product (which is the same problem, searxng does have too, so there is nothing we can do about it but yes we can improve the bot evasion system, so that even less engines do it and we would welcome contributions in that area). 😅

    Also, if you have more questions about anything feel free to ask, we would be very glad to answer them 😊 and we appreciate it 👍 too as it also helps answer and clarify other people's doubts too.

  • Yes, you are right but in a privacy oriented manner (only your IP address is shared nothing else - that also you know you can change it via VPN or proxy), your user agent is random every time you make a request, there is random delay added, etc and also no ads in your search results. Moreover we rerank the results on our side (not the most perfect but contributions can help make us make it better). 😅

    (Disclaimer: I am the owner of the project)

  • DeGoogle Yourself @lemmy.ml

    Websurfx 1.24.36 release

  • Privacy @lemmy.ml

    Websurfx 1.24.36 release

  • Rust Programming @lemmy.ml

    Websurfx 1.24.36 release

  • Thanks ❤️ for having a look at our project, if you need any help then feel free to DM me here or ask it here, I would be glad to help 😊 .

  • Web Development @programming.dev

    Websurfx 1.24.36 release

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Websurfx 1.24.36 release

  • Opensource @programming.dev

    Websurfx 1.24.36 release

  • Rust @programming.dev

    Websurfx 1.24.36 release

  • Thanks ❤ for trying out our project. Yes, that is something that is being worked on currently. Though some pages do support mobile layout, but others are a work in progress. So they will be worked on soon, probably in the next few releases. 🙂

  • Thanks ❤️ for trying out. If you encounter any problems/issues. Then feel free to ask them here. 🙂

  • Thanks ❤️ for asking this question. Yes, exactly the search engine does not share any data except the search query and IP address and nothing else making it really private though we will be adding tor and I2P feature which will also remove the concern of sharing the IP address to the upstream search engine as well. 🙂

  • Ok, thanks ❤️. I really appreciate your help. 🙂 .

  • Ok sure, thanks for the suggestion, I would make the change as soon as possible. Also, next time, I would make sure to provide a brief description with the release announcement.

  • Thanks for taking a look at my project 🙂 .

    We are already planning to have an initial support for this added soon in the coming releases. Right now, we are looking for someone who has more in depth knowledge on how to manage memory more efficiently like reduce heap usages, etc. So if you could help with this, I would suggest letting us know. 🙂

  • Web Development @programming.dev

    Websurfx 1.15.0 release

  • Open Source @lemmy.ml

    Websurfx 1.15.0 release

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Websurfx 1.15.0 release

  • Rust @programming.dev

    Websurfx 1.15.0 release

  • You're welcome :)

  • Yes, I have found the fix. I will publish it tomorrow morning as soon as possible, so no worries :).

  • Sorry for the delay in the reply.

    Thanks for the feedback :).

  • Sorry for the delay in reply.

    Thanks for the suggestion :). We are already having plans of supporting this in the near future.

  • Sorry for the delay in reply.

    Thanks for checking out my project. We are already working on fixing this issue, and we will fix it soon as possible as :).

    Also, I would suggest following this issue. Here I explain on how to fix this issue.

    Here is the link:

    https://github.com/neon-mmd/websurfx/issues/242

    If you find any difficulties, just leave a reply on this issue. We would be glad to help :).

  • Sorry for the delay in reply.

    Building on BastingChemina's comment. Thanks for the help :).

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    Websurfx - An open source alternative to Searx which aggregates results from other search engines (metasearch engine) without ads while keeping privacy and security in mind.

  • Open Source @lemmy.ml

    Websurfx - An open source alternative to Searx which aggregates results from other search engines (metasearch engine) without ads while keeping privacy and security in mind.

  • Rust @programming.dev

    Websurfx - An open source alternative to Searx which aggregates results from other search engines (metasearch engine) without ads while keeping privacy and security in mind.

  • Rust @programming.dev

    Leptos v0.4.8 release (Full disclosure: Not my project)

    github.com /leptos-rs/leptos/releases/tag/v0.4.8
  • Rust @programming.dev

    Blog Post: How To Wrap Your Errors With Enums When Using Error-Stack

    betterprogramming.pub /how-to-wrap-your-errors-with-enums-when-using-error-stack-77b122016e6e