It would be comparable if NASA scientists were racing against someone else controlling another vehicle over there with less ping.

P.S. I'm not saying it isn't challenging - it surely is, but it's like connecting to your home computer over a shitty connection to play a single player game.

Yeah, in this sense I agree. I'm overanalyzing again.

Science laws won't cease to exist, but if you wipe out everyone's memory, their knowledge of that science will cease to exist - so they'll have to figure it out from zero - and there's no guarantee that there won't be another placeholder in a sense (i.e. what religions have been historically) for what's yet to understand.

Edit: maybe it's more accurate to say science laws would cease to exist, but won't cease to work; they would cease to exist in a formulated way (in that hypothetical memory loss) since they were put together by humans.

Bartender: "Sorry, dude, you've had quite a few drinks, I have to cut you off, only water for you from now on."

Jesus: "Dammit... "

Asking the real questions

Artificial onetelligence

Yesn't

... with the difference being that it's not scripted.

Okay, I get the idea of smart AC for example - be elsewhere, turn it on remotely so that it's comfortable when you get home. Fine. But a toilet? You are physically present there, you can push a button to flush. Or are you telling me that you're shitting remotely now too?

Imagine the market being saturated with all kinds of keyboards in various form factors and layouts and someone holding you accountable for what you're using.

I used to think I can't do without an F-row. Nowadays I use a bunch of 60-ish boards (a Boardwalk, a Lily58, an Elora) and it's all fine. Even back when I was using a 75%, I was used to have e.g. the arrows on IJKL on a layer (of course it doesn't work well for games, but for things like text editing I'd argue it's even better than dedicated keys). In general I'd suggest to everyone to challenge themselves a little bit with things that don't seem good at first but might end up being useful in the long run.

Fair point, but good luck convincing them about it.

I'm not saying "don't make progress", I'm saying "try to make progress across the board".

IMO another example of pushing numbers ahead of what's actually needed, and benefitting manufacturers way more than the end user. Get this for bragging rights? Sure, you do you. Some server/enterprise niche use case? Maybe. But I'm sure that for 90% of people, including even those with a bit more demanding storage requirements, a PCIe 4 NVMe drive is still plenty in terms of throughput. At the same time SSD prices have been hovering around the same point for the past 3-4-5 years, and there hasn't been significant development in capacity - 8 TB models are still rare and disproportionately expensive, almost exotic. I personally would be much more excited to see a cool, efficient and reasonably priced 8/16 TB PCIe 4 drive than a pointlessly fast 1/2/4 TB PCIe 5.

Assuming you meant GB/s, not TB/s, I think it's for the sake of convenience when doing comparisons - there are still SATA SSDs around and in terms of sequential reads and writes those top out at what the interface allows, i.e. 500-550 MB/s.

Somewhat agree, but since Scrum is supposed to be bent to the team's needs, it might differ from team to team, but it's fine as long as those numbers are consistently used in one team.

If story points are now hours, I hope you're fine with me putting a 40 on that ticket.

"T-shirts are amazing - your body goes into one hole and goes out of three."

Windows Mail was IMO perfect for simple mail at home. Now they replaced it with Outlook with slightly updated UI but also with ads.

Guess what - I started looking for alternatives. So far Wino Mail seems pretty good - someone else on here recommended it.

Technically correct if you die... with the caveat that you won't be able to do much else.

Ducks is heads because ducks have heads.

What kind of scary ass clowns came to your birthday?