Skip Navigation

whoever loves Digit 🇵🇸🇺🇸🏴‍☠️

@ iloveDigit @piefed.social

Posts
68
Comments
634
Joined
4 mo. ago

Digit is Digit. I love her. I knew her online from wallstreetbets and she disappeared while going through some shit. I keep needing proof she's safe.

To anyone I've ever treated unfairly, I apologize.

  • Not sure what you're trying to say but cost of living will continue to increase due to continued reliance on the continually depleting crude oil supply

  • I feel like it was quite generous of me to read this, and I gained nothing from it. Not seeing the threshold met to read the other comment

  • That gives them no chance to put statements on the line for accountability either

    I'm thinking we might need a new fediverse app to properly integrate this vote filtering functionality, or some future nostr app

    Someone said running a piefed instance lets you see who's voting on content, so if true, the data is there to make it easy for a fediverse app to do this

  • Was that the intended goal or a side effect? Are you saying team PieFed are fundamentally hostile to this area of improvement?

  • I don't want to disable downvotes. I want to filter upvotes and downvotes from malicious usernames. I downvoted your comment, can't do that if they're disabled. Didn't do it in bad faith, your comment actually seemed disingenuous.

    Will read the rest of your comment if you confirm you understand the difference between disabling downvotes and filtering malicious voters

  • Very insightful post, I appreciate it. Especially the info that I can potentially get the data by starting a new instance.

    I must address this part -

    when someone replies with a rather toxic comment, and so I go through their recent history to see if they provide any value at all or if I am better to simply erase their existence from my view of the Threadiverse, and more often than not lately I see them offering helpful posts and replies in other contexts. Everyone has bad / off-days.

    Filtering votes should be separate from filtering replies for this reason. I basically only block people that block me or threaten to block me, very different from how aggressively I'd want to filter votes.

    Thank you again for your response, very helpful. More reason to have hope / not give up

  • Sounds like you didn't read much of what you're replying to because you're trolling, or you read it and ignored it because you're trolling

  • If this answers my question, it's not until after some other unrelated shit you forgot to put at the end instead of the beginning

  • Thank you & upvoted for the suggestion, but a CSS filter has no much less effect, it's like burying your head in the sand.

    Pseudonymous voting with its own filter would have an actual impact, people ganging up on someone with abuse would have the actual consequence of needing to spin up new accounts every time or lose their standing with the people they're attacking. People who aren't deemed malicious by each other would be able to see the sum of each other's votes, which would suddenly give meaning to vote counts beyond a measure of how much visibility your post will get (which reddit now measures directly with a view counter anyway).

    If you want to see the context of my post, feel free to look through my post history, it's not hard to find many examples.

    Edit - changed "no effect" to "much less" because this is all psychological, and burying head in the sand could be better than nothing. I'm not sure though

  • I can't afford that luxury. My mental health will have to keep adapting.

    Anyway, I can easily tell you how replies have a purpose even when they can't be filtered. Can you tell me how reddit votes have a purpose when they can't be filtered? You think I want to know what a horde of malicious, moronic, anti-intellectual anonymous psychopaths and possible bots deemed worthy of my front page? Or is it something else?

  • You don't need reply filtering. You need more rational thought processes. This is intended as a dig, and it comes with me assuming you don't tell people they "need counselling/therapy" when they make bad arguments to support unnecessary levels of reply filtering. You only do it to me when I make good arguments to support the exact level of vote filtering we should have.

    I don't know if your reply was intended as a dig, but you unintentionally gaslit me, and my turning it around on you was not only a return to correctness, but also rephrased to avoid gaslighting. Do you notice that? Are you capable of admitting any part of this paragraph is true, as a token of good faith?

    My original post is exactly correct: the mental health impact on me (and probably others) will be much better with the first platform that functions like reddit or piefed, but with the aforementioned vote filtering. And it's ridiculous that today we have this childish reply-filtering culture instead.

  • Considering PieFed keeps at least 1 extremely abusive / bad-faith-discussion-tactic-using person on staff, I don't expect PieFed to fix this

    Similar deal with reddit

    A nostr-based reddit clone might be the one to fix this in the future

  • My recommended method of knowing a text's contents would be reading it, instead of training yourself to "feel like" it's whatever will get you the most upvotes.

  • Considering some of the other replies after yours, turns out those people are hostile and it's better not to feed their aggressive delusions

  • Did you think you had a point here or are you just whoring for upvotes from your fellow bullies?

  • You might wanna learn to read, what they said wasn't "calling people liars"

  • Incorrect

  • Shitty Ask Lemmy @lemmy.uhhoh.com

    Could Katara do her "spirit water" healing with Voldemort's horcrux water from Harry Potter 6?

  • Antiwork @lemmy.ca

    I've been trying to refine this post / find the right place to post it. How's this?

  • Political Memes @lemmy.ca

    Technically not really a meme, but any place I post this might ban me anyway

  • Low Effort Memes @crazypeople.online

    no meme just headlines

  • Fuck Cars @lemmy.ca

    I'm sorry, Uncle Ben

  • retrocomputing @lemmy.sdf.org

    Might not interest anyone here until a later development stage, but this open-source key generator can run on a Nintendo 64: "retro-crypto"

    github.com /bowler-bear/retro-crypto/releases
  • Linux Memes @programming.dev

    just leave some RAM

  • PieFed Meta @piefed.social

    Do PieFed and mbin have the same Tor support issue as Lemmy?