Isn't big tobacco still the major investor in cancer epidemiology research? I mean, when it's not about cigarettes and nicotine
If they want to be as unhappy as everyone else, they are welcome
Please, chatty make me stupid so I could be happy again
Just hope that the next intelligent species will speedrun capitalism
Hollywood level politics. Just shut up
Are you 12
Nazis were to found an Israel county on Madagascar.
He's a genius and you have a coffee date, mate
Oh no, not again
No questions regarding the populational risks as the small percentages would shine with the big numbers.
WHO's recommendations remain the same for decades indeed: lower processed and red meat, eat chicken and fiber.
What's your point exactly?
That were Putin's babysteps
Using DEI is often a good thing, but DEI president is not
Like I said, it may be a scientifically interesting study, but the broader audience can't take anything from it but anxiety.
a diet that reduces your chance of cancer by 20 or 30%, say.
That would be significant, but probably not today. The lifetime risk of dying as a pedestrian in a car accident is around 1 in 100, so mitigating other risks is not an option for now
Russia mentioned 🇷🇺
Like... is it written to excite anxiety?
Getting a colorectal cancer probability in a lifetime is about 0.04, eating hotdog adds 8% to it or ~0.003. I like how precisely we can measure it using regular statistics, but what does it tell to a human being? To me it tells nothing about hotdogs
I have been doing it for like.. 13 years already? First because I was broke then it has become a habit
How do you treat cancer in the US? Asking out of curiosity but I want serious answers.
I am not from the US. Had my close relative fight with cancer. If not for the government which sponsored it almost fully, excluding a couple of procedures like PET, it would cost our family a lot. Just for the scale: pial for one infusion of one out of three drugs would cost us $8k and my relative would've needed 16 infusions.