Sometimes we also don't need any checks and balances to scam people out of their money.

Please leave and don't come back.

Well that's just like, your opinion, man.

I hope everyone realizes this is another crypto scam.

Yeah sounds like you've got a good plan. I'm far from being an expert, so can't unfortunately give you deep insights.

Just be mindful of the burnout. It's a marathon, not a sprint. That, and doing reps with good technique. Once the technique is not there anymore, it can be considered a failure and you can stop.

Sounds like you're doing pretty well then. Somehow it didn't click me how short time you've been at it yet, so just keep doing what you're doing. The results will come in time.

At this point you should probably be aware of burning out or getting bored after a while since your training frequency is so intense.

Also, if you feel like you don't need rest, you might not have enough weights, or your technique needs improvement.

You can try different routines. Here's something I did that helped, mainly because it permitted me to try heavier weights within my program:

• Old routine: 1 warm up set followed by 4 sets of 10-12 reps.
• New routine: 1 warm up set followed by a very hard set of up to 5-6 reps followed by 2-3 sets of 10-12 reps.

You didn't really specify the details of your program, but maybe this will give you something to experiment with.

Edit: also if you're at the gym 6 days a week, you might need a break.

Minä en ihan suoraan osta tuota premissiä, että vedestä tulee öljyä arvokkaampaa. Puhdasta vettä osataan jo aika tehokkaasti erotella merivedestä.

Sen sijaan jos sitä kestävästi saadaan myytyä vaikka Nestlelle hyvään hintaan, niin sehän voisi olla ihan hyväkin juttu. Kesken se tuskin loppuu, toisin kuin vaikka malmit, joita iloisesti on myyty ulkomaalaisille kaivosyhtiöille.

Olen ulkona silmukasta, mihin tämä viittaa?

Could have said "energy drink", but shilling for a global megacorp is fine too I guess.

Well I for one downvoted just because the comic is shit.

Lapsellista ja tyhmää ihan takuulla, mutta joskus kamppailulajeja harrastaneena näkisin, että jollakin tavalla hallittu väkivalta on joillekin tosi palkitsevaa. Ennen matsia ja sen aikana tulee adrenaliinia, ja sen jälkeen endorfiineja, mikä koukuttaa helposti. Ja tuommoisessa joukkotappelussa on vielä yhteisöllisyyttä, jota ei millään löydy arjessa. Kaiken tuon saisi tosiaan myös kehästä, molskilta tai tatamilta, mutta sitten jos päälle laitetaan vielä joku epäsosiaalinen personallisuushäiriö ja halu vaan riehua, niin selittäviä tekijöitä alkanee olla kylliksi.

Muuten olisin melkein sitä mieltä että tehkööt aikuiset keskenään mitä haluaa, mutta noilla huligaaneilla tuppaa olemaan myös taipumusta käydä sivullisten päälle, hajottaa paikkoja ja käyttäytyä muutenkin häiritsevästi, niin ajattelen että pärjättäsiin aika hyvin ilmankin.

It might not be so simple. Once you've imposed these tariffs to your allies, you can't go back to the world where they didn't exist. Everyone sees this and will remember, it will take a long time to build trust again, including among investors.

The billionaires will possibly benefit from this, but it's very risky. If he just wanted to please the wealthy, he could have just gone with some tax cuts and removing regulations as is traditional for the Republicans.

He in fact did, just the win was stolen by the supreme court.

Agreed. Moronic idealism to back corporate interests over the working class by the Dems certainly screwed us over.

That's not idealism my friend, just cold opportunism and cynical realism.

Imagine if the Dems actually stole policies from Nader, and sucked in those Nader voters? Imagine how much better we’d be as a nation?

This is a good point. However Gore was a good candidate. Not perfect, but good with a chance of winning. Nader was perhaps perfect for some people, but he absolutely could not have won anything in that election.

Yes, the Republican supreme court was the real problem. However, with Nader's votes it would have been more difficult to claim victory, as Florida would have been a wider margin win for Gore. What were those Nader votes good for? Absolutely nothing.

Nader pulled from D and R voters in equal measure. Nader's Wikipedia page disagrees. Miami-Dade county was deliberately obstructed from completing its vote counting by Republican campaign staff Blaming Nader for a judicial coup is asinine.

Yes, we should not forget that the Republicans were the real villains here. And that the Democrats should have protested much harder. However, the point is that Gore was initially declared winner, but because his margin was not significant enough, there was room to obfuscate the victory. Had he gotten Nader's votes, it would have been more difficult to claim Bush victory.

You hardly have to imagine. Just ask Republicans how they felt about the Perot voters in '92, when Clinton swept the EC with 43% of the total vote.

Yeah, it was mostly a rhetoric question. I was mainly thinking all the bullshit about stolen election in 2020.

The degree to which Florida has been fumbled by Dems for the last 30 years cannot be overstated.

As much as they messed up there, I have to point out that a significant percentage of the voters went for Nader (although would have preferred Gore to Bush). That stupid idiotic moronic idealism cost them and the world two pointless wars in the Middle East, whose ripple effects can still be felt. Nevertheless R's just stole the election and the D's rolled over I suppose in order not to cause instability and keep the corporate overlords happy. Can you imagine how angry the R machinery would have gotten if the roles were reversed (possibly some of the D base as well, but just because they're not similar scum as R voters)?

The democrats are very good at fighting a change inside their own party. They're very bad at fighting republicans on the national stage. Case in point, voter suppression in the last election, the stolen election of Gore v. Bush in 2000 (Gore had majority in Florida in the end, did you hear CNN reporting about it?)

To extend a bit, the DNC controls the machine to run elections. They are friends with the corporate donors and the "left wing" media. Without their support it's very hard to brand yourself as a full blown democrat candidate, which eventually will matter to the voting public.

Ok, you're right in this sense. However, I meant beaten badly in the sense of expectations vs. reality. If you followed any media, it was supposed to be a slight edge for Kamala, or at least a good chance for an upset. In the end the R's got president, senate and congress. And the outcome was clear after the first few hours, unlike something like Gore vs. Bush.