that sounds less like "a drawback" and more like "fucking unusable"

hey I don't have time to watch this so I'll ask here since you're arguing in favor of it: how is storage handled? is it a concern? wouldn't any reasonable amount of storage have the risk of being almost immediately run out of space if the instance is even modestly popular?

sounds like a great argument for nationalization.

the only trinity I believe in

most other countries still have their constitution though

good job on the rim lighting, god

the tacos. the other three are why I started the fire... allegedly.

wake up honey, new BDS list just dropped.

but seriously I like that there's a list of "maga friendly businesses"... because up until now the fascism has been too subtle.

we do agree on yikes. but I have to give it to you; this is the longest I've seen someone have libertarian takes without bringing up age of consent laws so that's nice

so you got a real kick out of that, did you

cigarettes should absolutely be illegal, as they infringe on other people's rights.

fast food is a ridiculous comparison. by the same logic shooting people should be legal because coughing in public isn't illegal, since both are "unhealthy" for people around you.

and again, accidents aren't personal. they involve others.

why, did you not see yours?

what do you even mean by infantilize? if you're not doing the most basic, demonstrably beneficial way to save more lives including yours and others, forcing you to do it is not infantilizing an adult, it's appropriately forcing someone who can't be an adult to act like one.

but this is just to meet you at your inane level. in reality this kind of law is very effective at making more mindful of their safety, even if idiots among them do it begrudgingly. if not for laws like this pretty much no one would fasten their seatbelt or wear a helmet on a bike, not because they're irresponsible but because it wouldn't occur to them or they wouldn't realize the importance and severity of such measures.

personal liberty includes children's right to have a parent alive and well for as long as possible even if they're too stupid to take measures against risk of an accident.

all laws are limits on personal liberty. that alone isn't a good argument against any law.

also if you're gonna say the risk of something is astronomically low you have to back it up. and even then it's not a good argument.

the answer is quite succinct though:

does it have the same number?

how is anyone born with the intention of holding eggs?

things really went to shit when he mimicked hitler. maybe in order to reverse it he needs to mimick hitler again. now what did he do to get out of the mess he created for himself?

he couldn't sleep at night because he was getting all his sleep during the hearings

that comm seems to be quite progressive, and very intent to interpret Christianity in a good and helpful way. bit weird to target them tbh.

hey I didn't say I cast the counterspell; just explaining how it is cast