Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P
Posts
0
Comments
363
Joined
9 mo. ago

  • Would you admit to being taken down by a chihuahua?

  • Yeah, and the same for booze or cigarettes. Those are luxuries and aren’t necessary to survive.

    Would you be fine with someone stealing videogames or a tv or phone? What about just holing up in your house?

  • I made it clear that it’s fine for survival, but not for frivolous stuff. How does that make me a Nazi? Or do you just throw that word around when you can’t articulate an intelligent response?

  • Yes that’s how life works.

    If you can’t afford to drive, you can’t just steal a vehicle lmfao.

    What about booze? Smokes? Advil? Where’s the line before someone’s just taking stuff so they feel better instead of surviving? Because that’s what people look the other way for, not for someone being selfish lmfao.

  • Chocolate though? That’s not even nutritional. There’s gotta be a line somewhere unfortunately.

  • What do you imagine that will do to the vehicle?

  • Magical chair apparantly.

  • This sounds like people (as a whole state unfortunately) don’t want to pay more taxes for sidewalk maintenance and stuff like snow clearing. So they need to get taxes elsewhere. The non-profit would still be paying more, another way, to cover the costs regardless.

    Or feel free to be responsible and pay for cleaning and replacing it, as well as all lawsuits yourself, which should be an option somehow, usually in an easement.

  • And?

  • What is sass?

  • I feel like people forget what sass is.

    Give an extremely stupid question expect an equally stupid answer. How’s the person supposed to know anyways.

    And if you try to play “I’m only testing the system”, well I’m fucking your obvious test up, good luck. You aren’t smarter than the system, someone is fucking with you for fun.

  • I mean the person asking the question doesn’t quite have it all there.

    If asked a question like that, I would give a similar answer. There’s no pointing out to the person how stupid of a question it is.

  • The louvres closed, they thought ahead.

  • There’s a a difference between abusing rules and breaking them. You fall into the former, not the latter.

  • Nice job with the fallacies and putting words in my mouth.

    Police would be for the carts and bottle throwing.

    Hospitals and shelters deal with mental health issues. I’ve never seen a homeless shelter without counselors, but I do suppose places would operate that way in other places.

    Why are you even suggesting the police would deal with mental health issues? This is the stigmatizing I’m talking about. And it would be no different between a homeless person or a non-homeless in these situations. So thanks for proving my point again.

    And it’s not unhoused, are they called unhoused shelters and societies? No, because you’re being facetious and attacking points I didn’t bring up because you didn’t like being clumped into the group stigmatizing homeless.

  • Shelters solve the problem for many but don't do anything to help the type of person causing trouble. That's all they're saying.

    That isn’t true at all. If there’s shelters, the other issues would be dealt with by the police, like non-homeless. The fact that people are making a distinction at all is entirely the issue, and what I’ve pointed out. And thank you for proving my point by being one of those people.

    I’m attacking the fact that they’re stigmatizing homeless like they’re any different than non-homeless. That bias and prejudice is what’s causing these issues. Treat homeless like they are human and they won’t act out anymore than nonhomeless. Shocking eh?