What do you mean "cling to the idea they can't be reached?" A huge portion of political spending goes towards trying to increase turnout (of the people likely to vote for you).
DOGE is basically a bunch of 25 year old know-nothings feeding budget spreadsheets and job descriptions to a chatbot and asking what to cut, so...
There was a second one?
A case for what damages? Reddit karma?
That's... More or less in agreement with what I said, though? The electoral college certainly doesn't help matters, but the same principle still holds without it, the EC just adds a second hierarchical level of fptp
It's not like the two party system is deliberately chosen or enshrined in law. The field naturally winnows down to two parties because that is basically guaranteed to outcompete every other possibility under a first-past-the-post voting system. You want to fix the two party system, you need to fix our voting system.
Girl, I can't keep track of who the "theys" and "girls" are enough to even have any idea what you're talking about
Well, they can't, because they're already in the public domain and nobody is around who can claim them as an original creation.
If you want this to be some pure hypothetical where that doesn't matter, then... Sure, I guess? That's what intellectual property is.
It's also not a tower defense game, it's a moba. There are towers and some defending of them, but you're not placing and upgrading towers to stop enemies, you're controlling one individual character from a large roster. The towers play a pretty minor role.
You see, a monad is like a burrito...
I know this is the least important one on there, but I don't get this thing lately where people talk about "staying hydrated" like it's some big challenge they have to put effort towards. Like... get thirsty, drink water?
Asking a bunch of random Internet posters on Lemmy, who know nothing about property speculation, land management, investment in general, or especially your country, while providing very few specifics about your plan, is not going to yield useful advice.
And George Soros being some kind of secret mastermind is also a right wing fever dream. Democrats wouldn't have any interest in doing such a thing
As though Lemmy, or any other vote/like-driven social network, hasn't been that from day 1?
Less friction to block a community
First of all, thank you so much for all your work! This is definitely a way better experience than the web client. And thanks for adding community blocking, so now I don't have to go back for that feature.
I like to keep pretty huge categories of communities out of my feed entirely. But, I also want to be aware of what other communities of interest might be out there, especially now while the Lemmy landscape is evolving so quickly. So the strategy of only ever browsing subs and foregoing All entirely doesn't really work.
But, as I've seen other people highlighting in other posts, federation also means that the number of redundant communities across instances is huge. I don't just have to block all the political communities, I have to block them everywhere we're federated with. My block-list is already gigantic and I don't anticipate the need to block communities going away soon.
It'd be a much smoother experience if Block Community was an option directly in the three-dot menu of a