Neural network-based full line completion? I feel like the Rust model isn’t as developed as those for other languages. It’s helpful in Rider for C#.
It’s really interesting that Proton feels like a step forward in cross-platform gaming, but it also made it more economical to focus on Windows builds and dependencies.
Steam has a lot of power in the market and a vested interest in making things easier for developers and publishers. I wouldn’t be surprised if they picked up (more of) the slack in keeping systems backwards compatible.
Same as Microsoft, sort of. They can’t afford to have Apple’s “courage” in dropping x86 and then amd64.
Steam, as mentioned, and an old iMac that I’ve been meaning to dual-boot for a while.
This kind of thing is mostly inevitable, but has an impact on software and game preservation.
The i686-pc-windows-gnu target has been demoted to Tier 2, as mentioned in an earlier post.
Fedora is discussing dropping support entirely, right? Interesting times we live in…
Like if the variable is then used in a function that only takes one type? Huh.
And bow to the compiler’s whims? I think not!
This shouldn’t compile, because .into needs the type from the left side and let needs the type from the right side.
I came here to laugh, not to cry!
[clicks light switch off and on repeatedly]
Welp, I guess we’re closed for the week.
I’d say I feel seen, but it’s really dark in here.
let a = String::from(“Hello, world!”).into()
I’ll see myself out.
Good article, thanks for the link! In the context of this conversation, I can agree that being exposed to different ways of solving problems will make you better and faster at doing just that.
Common criticisms here would be that these endeavors stifle creativity and show the adoption of modern solutions. That said, I find conducting “code archeology” to figure out the idiomatic way of doing something in an old project very rewarding. Because computer programs exist in people’s mind’s, doing that with the support of original developers or subject matter experts is some of the most effective knowledge transfer I’ve ever witnessed.
My take on a summary: like C/C++, Rust can be relevant in a variety of use-cases and one could conceivably build a long-term career on it, while adjusting to market/technology interests.
Seems like a reasonable prediction?
That totally threw me off. “Literally unplayable,” as they say.
That makes sense. I’m also involved in localization efforts. In niche cases, it’s paid off to work with the clients directly on that. You get you a good balance between correctness and day-to-day usefulness.
Since ladder is mostly diagram-based it almost doesn’t need to be localized and isn’t jarring when you use non-English variable and function names with English keywords.
Apart from being strictly left-to-right.
If he worked in Germany, did he use English or German mnemonics?
If he worked in Germany, did he use English or German mnemonics?
Industrial controls equipment made by German companies can be programmed in English or German. You can also switch languages (German/English) at any time and the IDE switches over all the keywords.