Skip Navigation

  • Maybe its an ATT issue but I use GOS and it doesn't work

  • To be fair Judaism did for the most part copy Zoroastrianisms homework

  • She used a secret method called the eepy girl technique :3

  • I may be biased but its NYC and specifically Upper Manhattan, I also like Northern Queens and the Bronx (fuck Staten Island) but Upper Manhattan is just my favorite part of this beautiful city. Second place would have to be Chicago and other than that I haven't really gone to many places I would consider great (I also haven't gone to many places).

  • GrapheneOS technically on paper supports RCS but I cant get it working and afaik most people can't get it working either (I think its more RCS works on GOS for some people with very specific carriers)

  • Tbh the simplistic props and extremely basic CGI is arguably what gives TOS its charm, it feels almost like a play with hand crafted props that are clearly props. It makes the series feel more lighthearted and silly (in a good way).

  • ReactOS should be mormonism

  • Nah Unix should be Zoroastrianism and Judaism should be Minix

  • You mean a reaction to principled leftists who understand the dictatorship of capital fundamentally cannot be voted away thus making liberalism an illusion? Because from your posts and comments you seem to be a shitlib who thinks they're a leftist.

    If you do not aspire for liberation and seek little more then stability in oppression than you are not a leftist. On a fundamental level what leftism is not an arbitrary position than one has because they support a 0.00001% tax hike on the wealthy. It is not the position that oppression is acceptable if it helps achieve personal comfort, the idea of so called "stable" liberal leadership where oppression and war actively get worse in the name of being "lesser evils". The idea that everything from genocide, oppression of the workers, subjection of minorities, and an absolute incompetence when it comes to doing anything productive is a fine basis for governence because "the alternative is worse" never once questioning why we must choose between weaponized incompetence and absolute reactionaries.

    As an objective fact liberation can only come with the abolition of private property. The underlying system of oppression must be destroyed not mitigated. This is the leftist way, it is the way of revolution and total liberation. No more should we beg for our daily bread and shelter, no more shall we suffer by capitalist exploitation, and no more shall the worker be degraded. I ask not that my specific school of thought be implemented, I ask only that true socialism be achived in my lifetime. Perhaps if society awoke to the class struggle and achived true class consciousness one day communism may be achieved.

  • What sort of shitlib nonsense is this, strawman and blatantly reactionary

  • As a transfem I am always looking for the bear :3

    (NV reference)

  • Fixed

  • Girlsmell :3

  • As an Arch user (btw) Debian is more than respectable. Truly one of the greatest distros of all time alongside Fedora, OpenSuse, and Alpine

    :3

  • Me fr :3

  • From my point of view leftism inherently means revolutionary and revolutionary is the opposite of reactionary. Supporting capitalism and private property in any capacity is inherently reactionary as is bigotry and class collaborationism. It is therefore impossible for a leftist to also be reactionary or hold significant reactionary positions (if they did they wouldnt be a leftist. Back to my main point it doesnt matter if someone is a "libertarian", "social liberal" or "conservative", the positions many hold on Tea is inherently reactionary and in my opinion thats all I really need to know.

  • I prefer to just call them liberals, mostly because the grand majority of right wingers are just libs (specifying right wing is uneeded because all liberals are right wing)

    • "conservatives" = conservative-liberals (economically liberal and socially conservative)
    • "libertarians" = liberals (I mean they're literally just classical liberals)
    • "liberals" = neoliberals (an inherently right wing ideology)
    • "social democrats" = neoliberalism (but with a fancy coat of paint)
  • Of course it was mostly .world users