Skip Navigation

khaosworks

@ khaosworks @startrek.website

Posts
148
Comments
260
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Lower Decks | 4x04 "Something Borrowed, Something Green"

    Jump

  • Star Trek: very Short Treks | "Worst Contact"

    Jump

  • I actually found this one amusing, but that may be because of the better voice work.

  • Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Lower Decks | 4x03 "In the Cradle of Vexilon”

    Jump

  • Star Trek: very Short Treks | "Holiday Party"

    Jump

  • That was just plain terrible. The first one was offensive, and this one was lame. The next I expect to be both.

  • Annotations for Star Trek: Lower Decks 4x02: “I Have No Bones Yet I Must Flee” (SPOILERS)

    Jump

  • SNW: “Spock Amok” was released on June 2, 2022 while PRO: “Mindwalk” was released on December 15, 2022. I’ll correct it.

  • Annotations for Star Trek: Lower Decks 4x02: “I Have No Bones Yet I Must Flee” (SPOILERS)

    Jump

  • Yes, these are generally little notes and comments on references that people may not catch when watching the episode.

  • Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Lower Decks | 4x01 "Twovix" and 4x02 "I Have No Bones Yet I Must Flee"

    Jump

  • As far as I remember they didn’t restore Frannie in VOY: “Spirit Folk” either.

  • Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Lower Decks | 4x01 "Twovix" and 4x02 "I Have No Bones Yet I Must Flee"

    Jump

  • Now I want to know how T’Lyn knows what Borg smell like.

  • Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Lower Decks | 4x01 "Twovix" and 4x02 "I Have No Bones Yet I Must Flee"

    Jump

  • Why do adult Gorn even exist when the young can apparently reproduce immediately?

    Jump

  • Please moderate your tone. You can disagree, but do so in a civil manner.

  • Why do adult Gorn even exist when the young can apparently reproduce immediately?

    Jump

  • Could you elaborate without people having to click on the link?

  • Deleted

    The 3 Ways

    Jump

  • Isn’t that the Janeway?

  • A funny The Cage production story from MAJEL BARRETT

    Jump

  • The story was written and drawn by John Byrne, who himself is a massive Star Trek fan, so would have been aware of this story.

  • The Wrath of Khan doesn't seem like a "best Star Trek film" to me -- why do so many people think that it is?

    Jump

  • Oh, where do I start?

    It’s a really, really tight script, for one, with little or no filler. Unlike TMP, it moves swiftly from scene to scene, from setup to setup, establishing its themes of mortality, aging, the inability to let go of the past, the tragedy and joy of moving forward, of rebirth right off the bat, in so subtle ways that most don’t catch it until later or a rewatch.

    For fanservice, it makes good use of a loose end from TOS continuity which is simple enough for non-fans to get without much exposition, and memorable enough that old viewers will remember it. The relationship between the Big Three is no longer as broken as it was throughout most of TMP, and the banter naturalistic and enjoyable, even among the supporting crew.

    Nick Meyer adds all these little touches in the background that make it ripe for literary analysis. A Tale of Two Cities and its themes of sacrifice, Kirk’s fondness for antiques, never really established before, echoing his nostalgia for times past. In Khan’s cargo carrier, you see on the shelf as Chekov discovers the SS Botany Bay tag: Dante’s Inferno, stacked on top of Milton’s Paradise Lost/Paradise Regained, stacked on top of Moby Dick, showing the progression of Khan’s experiences on Ceti Alpha V, echoing his hope in reference to Milton at the end of “Space Seed” - to rule in Hell, build his own Paradise - now replaced by obsessive revenge.

    ST II also sets up TNG, in its way, by introducing Peter Preston, David Marcus and Saavik - essentially Scotty, Kirk and Spock’s offspring - the next generation of voyagers that the old guard are trying to give way to, but the past just won’t let them and indeed threatens that legacy.

    And then of course there’s the space battles - never really as well executed due to SFX limitations in TOS - but yet leaning so completely into the nautical and submarine metaphor established by Roddenberry and “Balance of Terror”. It was a risky move in an era dominated by adrenaline-fueled Star Wars dogfight-like starship combat, but Meyers’ direction made it work. There’s never a time you don’t know exactly what’s going on in that battle, or what tactics the two sides are employing.

    You’re right in the sense that it’s not traditionally what one expects of Star Trek, leaning more into the pulp adventure mold rather than the aliens and exploration mold. But to a degree it’s still an optimistic future. Kirk’s son and Spock’s daughter ready to take the reins, the Genesis Planet representing the potential for new life, Kirk himself experiencing a rebirth of sorts as he finds his youth restored as his best friends told him it would be - on the bridge of a starship. But who says the final frontier can’t be inside us, too? (Archer said as much)

    And in the end, it’s a complete movie. The forced-on-Meyer shot of Spock’s torpedo casing notwithstanding, it’s a complete story from start to finish, with no “The Human Adventure Is Just Beginning” tease or the sequelitist tones of the next two movies. All the information you need to know is in here. You could watch it without tying it to a larger universe and be completely satisfied with the experience. All you really need to know beforehand is that it’s connected to this TV show from the 60s.

  • The Thing (1982, dir. John Carpenter)

    Jump

  • I try to always say, “I don’t know what it is, but it’s weird and pissed off,” when people ask me to identify something.

  • Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Strange New Worlds | 2x10 "Hegemony"

    Jump

  • “Shuttle stuffed with torpedoes” wouldn’t work because it’d be obvious it was weaponized - a single shuttle likely couldn’t take out that beacon on its on.

    At least the saucer section of the Caygua was big enough to provide plausibility. Even if they found pieces of the rockets later they’d have no real proof - the rockets could be claimed to have been standard equipment or part of the RCS or impulse systems.

  • Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Strange New Worlds | 2x10 "Hegemony"

    Jump

  • Exhibit A: The Battle of Wolf 359.

  • Annotations for Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 2x10: “Hegemony” (SPOILERS)

    Jump

  • While the name has been applied to the Christian God, since the term predates any connection with Abrahamic religions to China, I was sticking to the most fundamental use of the word - to refer to a supreme deity, as it was in the Shang Dynasty.

    China has had more than one type of religion, even if some of them have been merged or mixed with each other, so to say it’s the supreme deity is also not precise. Shangdi has been used in Taoism as well as Confucianism, among others. Rather than get into a theological history, I was just compressing it into as general a term as possible.

    Your usage is not entirely incorrect, but it implies that there is only one supreme deity in China, which is not quite precise either.

  • Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Strange New Worlds | 2x10 "Hegemony"

    Jump

  • I was just trying to answer the technological criticisms about why Spock didn’t search.

    I see where the criticism is coming from, but I can also see there are all sorts of extenuating circumstances around it (not to mention lack of time) and to take the plot there for a search would kind of kill the story momentum.

    It’s not invalid as a criticism, just saying that tech reasons are covered.

  • Risa @startrek.website
    khaosworks @startrek.website

    The Picard Club

  • Risa @startrek.website
    khaosworks @startrek.website

    The logical thing

  • Risa @startrek.website
    khaosworks @startrek.website

    Two… wait… three? Saavik was a foster, does that count?

  • Daystrom Institute @startrek.website
    khaosworks @startrek.website
    Archive

    Making sense of Kirk’s early service history

  • Daystrom Institute @startrek.website
    khaosworks @startrek.website

    Annotations for Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 2x05: “Charades” (SPOILERS)

  • Daystrom Institute @startrek.website
    khaosworks @startrek.website
    Archive

    Vulcan logic is a philosophy, not a process: understanding and misunderstanding cthia

  • Daystrom Institute @startrek.website
    khaosworks @startrek.website
    Archive

    Why Star Trek Warp Drive is not the "Alcubierre Drive"

  • Daystrom Institute @startrek.website
    khaosworks @startrek.website

    Annotations for Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 2x04: “Among the Lotus Eaters” (SPOILERS)