Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)IV
Posts
0
Comments
248
Joined
2 yr. ago
  • There are plenty of sites that use more than one parameters. It's true that a lot of sites now use the history API instead of url parameters but you can still find plenty, and you have no garante about the parameters order. Any site with a search page that have a few options will probably use url parameters instead of the history API. It's easier to parse and will end up being shorter most of the time.

  • Well for youtube it's quite easy, there are only 4 useful parameters that I can think of, the video id v, the playlist id list and index if it's a playlist and the time t if you're sending a specific time in the video. Everything else can be removed. Here's what uBlock Origin with the AdGuard URL Tracking filter list:

     undefined
        
    ! Youtube
    $removeparam=embeds_referring_euri,domain=youtubekids.com|youtube-nocookie.com|youtube.com
    $removeparam=embeds_referring_origin,domain=youtubekids.com|youtube-nocookie.com|youtube.com
    $removeparam=source_ve_path,domain=youtubekids.com|youtube-nocookie.com|youtube.com
    ||youtube.com^$removeparam=pp
    
      
  • You don't DDOS through a VPN. The first D is for distributed, you do it from a multitude of devices, often hacked ones from a botnet. So DDOS attribution is hard. And if you want some scale you reflect the attack on some other machine that runs a service that allow for amplification, making attribution even harder.

  • Ça ne fait que republier des articles d'autres sites, en plus sans les mettre à jour. Tu peux cliquer sur la source et tu verra qu'elle a été modifié et ne parle plus des loups gris. De toute façon elle ne se basait que sur le fait qu'on entendrait crier "Turquie" dans la vidéo de la fuite, ce qui est très discutable.

  • This means putting your trust in Obscura, since they’re the 1st hop, receiving your data without additional encryption, a new player, who yet has to prove that they’re trustworthy.

    I've not checked but the whole claim is to use additional encryption, between you and the 2nd hop.

    With our 2-party setup, Obscura operates the 1st hop, and we’re proud to partner with Mullvad who operates the 2nd (exit) hop. As the WireGuard packets are end-to-end encrypted to Mullvad’s servers, we never see any parts of your packet in plaintext (not even SNI). In fact, you can check your connected server’s public key in the Obscura App against those listed on Mullvad’s server page!

    https://obscura.net/blog/bootstrapping-trust/#obscura

  • The link you posted is about using steam with NTFS and the installation method has nothing to do with it.

    Even after reinstalling steam with the steam.deb file it shows the same error

  • I've never seen the !0 and !1, it is dumb and indicates either young or terrible devs.

    Boolean(window.chrome) is the best, !!window.chrome is good, no need to test if it's equal to true if you make it a boolean beforehand.