Totally disagree. I've seen original sources reproduced that show exactly what an AI copied to make images.
And humans can definitely create things that have never been seen before. An AI could never have invented general relativity having only been trained on Newtonian physics. But Einstein did.
CMS will partner with private companies that specialize in enhanced technologies, like AI or machine learning, to assess coverage for select items and services delivered through Medicare.
In particular, the American Hospital Association expressed concerns regarding the participating vendor payment structure, which it says incentivizes denials at the expense of physician medical judgment.
This is going to be even MORE corrupt than what we have today, and its going to hurt people even more. Meanwhile enriching AI tech bros off the already bloated medical system in this country.
It's implied that the egg in question is the chicken egg. Otherwise the answer is trivially obvious to anyone. Obviously non-chicken eggs came before chickens. Why would that be an interesting philosophical thought?
This line of thinking is a real misunderstanding of creativity. "Humans are only remixing things they've learned, so AI is the same". It's not the same. If an AI has nothing but images of apples in its training data, it will never ever be able to draw a banana. It seems creative and smart on the surface only because its trained on the (stolen) input of every bit of art, text, and code on the internet. But if humans stop creating new imaginative input, it will stagnate right where it is.
Of course I want money to live well and get what I need and want. But they have more money than they could spend in a thousand lifetimes and still want more. I don't want that.
Sadly its fake