Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CR
Posts
15
Comments
816
Joined
1 yr. ago
  • Here is something I’ve been curious about. Congress has undisputed constitutional control of tariffs. A previous Congress enacted a law to delegate some of that authority to the President.

    So now.. how can the President (or anyone) just say, “fuck you, you can’t have your constitutional power back?” Why can’t Congress just fall back to their constitutional authority and render their predecessors’ delegation invalid?

  • So why the fuck does he think he needs to be involved and to solve this through physical violence?

    Significant money placed on stupidity combined with a corporal punishment upbringing. What are the odds he’s also a Republican?

  • Permanently Deleted

  • The VA doesn’t find out what’s wrong with vets, they ask vets to come with deep medical knowledge and diagnoses to support their claims. In my branch at least.. diagnoses weren’t handed out. Only Motrin.

    As you say, these companies give vets the ammo needed to support their claims, and that requires a medical provider’s time. Whoever is behind these articles is advocating against veterans receiving benefits once the military breaks them.

  • All they had to do (as an example) is tell someone, somewhere, that only one form of ID is enough to let him back into the country—if he happens to show up there—to be compliant.

    Anything along these lines is “following the court order” to facilitate his return.

  • The SC was complicit when they chose the word “facilitate” instead of giving measurable tasks.

    make (an action or process) easy or easier.

    That’s so fucking little a requirement, it’s effectively not one. How no one saw this I don’t know.

  • News @lemmy.world
    credo @lemmy.world

    I’m going to editorialize a bit here. The DoD was ready to fire every probationary employee today. An AF Lieutenant General came to tears yesterday breaking the news to staff. And this is not just first year employees as the media keeps pointing out- this changed this to two years in 2015 for the DoD. For many excepted employees, it actually takes three years to leave the probationary period. Doing rough math (3 years out of a 30 year career- that’s 10% of that particular population). It took “woke” CNN to point out the law that you can’t just fire ~6% of the workforce without first determining what will break.

    Too bad this wasn’t law for the IRS and other agencies.

    News @lemmy.world
    credo @lemmy.world

    Defense Department prepares for mass civilian firings within days

    ADHD memes @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    credo @lemmy.world

    "One of the most dangerous discoveries in life is how much you can procrastinate and still (mostly) get the job done."

    Reddit @lemmy.world
    credo @lemmy.world

    Reddit CEO signals subreddits requiring a subscription fee coming this year

    News @lemmy.world
    credo @lemmy.world
    politics @lemmy.world
    credo @lemmy.world
    Ukraine @sopuli.xyz
    credo @lemmy.world

    Massive Explosion Near Russia's Arctic Naval Base Sparks Theories

    Posted in world, thought it fits better here

    Basically, more reporting on this thread from 3 days ago: https://sopuli.xyz/post/20331137

    Still nothing concrete about what happened.

    Ukraine @sopuli.xyz
    credo @lemmy.world

    30 Nov: War in Ukraine Explained

    World News @lemmy.world
    credo @lemmy.world

    Biden Allows Ukraine to Strike Russia With Long-Range U.S. Missiles

    Ukraine @sopuli.xyz
    credo @lemmy.world

    Biden Allows Ukraine to Strike Russia With Long-Range U.S. Missiles

    News @lemmy.world
    credo @lemmy.world

    Biden Allows Ukraine to Strike Russia With Long-Range U.S. Missiles

    politics @lemmy.world
    credo @lemmy.world

    Trump Takes Lead in 538 Simulations

    For the first time since 538 published our presidential election forecast for Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, Trump has taken the lead (if a very small one) over Harris. As of 3 p.m. Eastern on Oct. 18, our model gives Trump a 52-in-100 chance of winning the majority of Electoral College votes. The model gives Harris a 48-in-100 chance.

    No Stupid Questions @lemmy.world
    credo @lemmy.world

    Am I supposed to ask stupid questions here, or not ask stupid questions?

    It’s kinda how you read the name, innit?

    News @lemmy.world
    credo @lemmy.world

    Whistleblower for Boeing contractor Spirit AeroSystems dies