cornishon

Not the first time, and the Kurds always came back for more.

Nobody ever told me I needed to read Proudhon to think the state’s bad

Yeah, cause if you actually read Proudhon, you'd probably lose interest in anarchism after realizing how unserious and idiotic the arguments and methodology of "the father of Anarchism" were.

Further reading: The Poverty of Philosophy (Part three has the funniest blunders of Mr. Proudhon, if you're looking for highlights).

I guess I did the meme and told you to read.

That's a BOLD claim.

groups recently agreed to form a coalition against the Iranian regime.

Why would Iran hit us?! REEEE

Iran warned that this is what would happen if they're attacked again, but all the Westerners and their puppets chose not to believe the threat.

None of the ISPs compete directly in most places, that's the beauty of it. They realized long time ago it's more profitable if they divide the US into little monopoly regions.

First of all, they were enriching uranium openly, not covertly, with IAEE monitoring their every move. Unlike Israel which has undeclared and never inspected nuclear arsenal.

Second, enriching uranium has non-military uses like nuclear medicine (at which Iran is actually a global leader btw).

And third, well, it's easier to get 90% enriched uranium from 60% than it is from zero, in case the ruling changes.

Never underestimate the power of sunk cost fallacy. They fell for the initial propaganda push (because they already had "Putin Bad" deeply ingrained in their brains), and from then on they will only look for confirming evidence and reject the contrary.

They are so desperate for a distraction, they were about to get tried and executed... oh, right, there was no threat of consequences.

We need to stop with the distraction cope. They're doing imperialism for imperialist reasons, not to manage the feeble internal discontent. They have culture wars for that.

Hmmm, both Kuwait and Qatar are tiny countries with disproportionately massive numbers of US military presence, almost like they have been specifically carved out for that purpose. Makes you think.

Not beating the memory of a goldfish allegations.

You mean US and 'Israeli' regimes, right?

Very important points made in the article.

It's very easy to meme about how if only Iran had nukes everything would be A-OK, but that's obviously not how the imperialist world works.

The article already mentions Pakistan, but a big elephant in the room of a counterexample to the supposed invincibility that possession of nukes grants is all too obvious: the Soviet Union is no longer with us.

Here's a very good interview by them on the same subject for those who prefer text:

https://www.pambazuka.org/Iran-vs-US-Imperialism

To do politeness finger wagging to a people who have suffered genocide at the hands of Jewish settlers, US imperialists and gulf compradors is an insult to their intelligence and to their humanity.

Enough said.

That's a low hanging fruit.

Why are you so upset about them restoring the original name? When was the last time US military defended the US soil vs. launching an attack?

The Western Empire just turning into common pirates.

OK, I mostly skimmed it not paying attantion to every single word, but the gist of it: Holy Libertarianism!

If Trump did it he must have had a good reason - MAGAs reacting to any inconvenient fact about Trump.

You: