Skip Navigation

User banner

Autumn64

@ autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

Posts
30
Comments
27
Joined
2 yr. ago

📍🇲🇽; 21 yo; 🏳‍⚧ (she/her); [es, en, eo, kr]; Developer, FOSS advocate. Ⓐ☭

Levanta la multicolor. ¡Viva la diversidad!

About me: https://www.autumn64.xyz/

  • Sun’s out, dress is out 👗☀️

    Jump

  • You look so beautiful!

  • Meetup rule

    Jump

  • hell yeah

  • i bet this post funny as hell

    Jump

  • bonjour je suis une pute

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Dishwashrule

  • Say again rule

    Jump

  • Ren from YKMET be like

  • this places needs leftist rules

    Jump

  • We love anarchist communism

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Chaos magick rule

  • Hi(rule)

    Jump

  • No but you're just so pretty!

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Bet rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    CPU pins rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    CPU pins rule

  • Trans woman rule

    Jump

  • I didn't make the meme, but it's definitely trans positive while also making fun of transphobes

  • Trans woman rule

    Jump

  • yeah it's making fun of transphobes

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Trans woman rule

  • Trash rule

    Jump

  • Cope

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Trash rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    :3 rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Fart rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    LO Satan rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    France rule

  • Charles II Rule

    Jump

  • I know, but I didn't make the meme anyway, so 🤷‍♀️

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Charles II Rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Rule

  • Fellow C and Rust programmers, how do you live without classes?

    Jump

  • My primary problem is that it's convention rather than rule.

    I agree, and thus I think it's safe to assume we also hate the lack of encapsulation in Python despite technically being an OOP language.

    Just don't use C if you can avoid it ;)

    I'm fine with C, and if I stop coding in C I would starve since my job depends on it, still thanks for the suggestion though! ;)

  • Fellow C and Rust programmers, how do you live without classes?

    Jump

  • There's still quite a few software written in C that does exactly as I did though. Look at OpenSSL's EVP library. I'm not sure about what you mean by "OOP but worse", wouldn't everything be worse than OOP since C isn't an OOP language? Anyways. As I said, what I did is way more common than it seems at least in C, so I get your point but still I can't seem to be able to see what's inherently wrong with it. I would appreciate if you shared any better ideas you might have, though!

  • Fellow C and Rust programmers, how do you live without classes?

    Jump

  • C programmer here. I can't code in Rust and although I do have some interest in learning it, C is still the best one to me. Probably not the best way to do it, but I'd do something like this (based on the code in your ss):

     c
        
typedef struct Player{
      float pos_x;
      float pos_y;
      float rotation;
} Player;

Player player_new(){
      Player player;
      player.pos_x = 0.0;
      player.pos_y = 0.0;
      player.rotation = 0.0;
      return player;
}

void player_move(Player *player, float x, float y){
      player->pos_x += x;
      player->pos_y += y;
      return;
}

void player_rotate(Player *player, float by){
      player->rotation += by;
      return;
}

int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
      Player player1 = player_new();
      player_move(&player1, 10.0, 10.0);
      player_rotate(&player1, 180.0);

      return 0;
}

    I would probably move the struct Player and the functions player_new, player_move and player_rotate to another file (like player.c or sth), I'd create its respective header file with the definitions of each thing and with that I basically created a simple interface to create and handle players without needing OOP. English is not my native language, so I'm not really sure about what's the name of the programming paradigm used in C (which definitely is not OOP), but in my native language we call it "programación estructurada", which in English would be something like "structured programming".

    Tbh I code in both non-OOP and OOP languages (most of the time C, JS and Python) and to me both paradigms are just fine. You can pretty much do anything in either, but each of them might work better for you on different situations and depending on your needs. I also use Vim btw.

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Autumn64 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule

  • smoke machine rule

    Jump

  • r/woooosh

  • W rule

    Jump

  • Update:

  • W rule

    Jump

  • It's been 8 hours since the poll started, maybe somebody has already voted the "Other" option.

    EDIT: Yep. I just checked and 4 people have voted "Other" so far.

  • Jesse is smarter than what we give him credit for.

    Jump

  • Aztec and mayan calendars iirc was 18 months of 20 days each and 5 extra days at the end of the year.

  • Linkin Park Rule

    Jump

  • Clown, eggs, two, four, six, eight, gas, liquid, solid

  • Neofox rule

    Jump