Ach, äh, ich glaube das kann eine lokale Spezialität bleiben. Im Teller find ich das schlimm genug, da ist aber wenigstens noch eine Scheibe Ei dabei.

How would they know that europe.eu is a legitimate government website? Anyone can register a .eu domain. If it ever expires, anyone can buy it. And even if they built a team that whitelists government websites, do you really want to have spam from them whitelisted? What if they get hacked, what if they use spam for military disinformation campaigns.

My point being: One email doesn't even tell you if their service sucks. Much less that Google is an enemy service and must be banned.

There are plenty of reasons to not use Google. There are even a bunch of reasons to ban Google. One false positive in their spam filter is not one of them.

Op had a false positive in their spam filter, and is now posting in multiple communities as if this was a clear sign that Google is part of a conspiracy to destroy the EU.

There are plenty of good reasons to not use Google. They're a monopoly, a privacy nightmare and their services continually become worse in pursuit of minmaxing profits. Heck, even gmails spam filter sucking is a good reason.

But OP had one false positive in their spam filter, and is now calling for banning Google because they're an enemy service.

That's insane conspiracy theorist behavior, which was my point.

Taking a single false positive in your spam folder as a sign that Google has joined a campaign against the EU sounds insane.

They literally control Google Search, Youtube, the entire Android ecosystem, have a small army of lobbyists and hundreds of billions of dollars to influence politicians, and instead of the literal millions of more effective attack vectors they have, putting .eu domains in their spam filters somehow made it onto their priority list? Really?

Especially when the alternative explanation is simply, that Google's spam filter had a false positive, like all spam filters have.

Ah yes, googles brilliant plan to destroy the EU by maliciously sending mail from europe.eu to the spam folder.

Ich glaube bei neueren Android Handys geht das fast immer. Bei einem laptop hab ich das aber auch noch nie gesehen...

Mich nerven vor allem Packungen, bei denen der Inhalt eine Primzahl ist. Wie soll man bitte 13 Fischstäbchen gerecht aufteilen??

AI has been in phones for ages. What's new is the following:

• It has become fashionable to market things as AI
• New phones can run more AI locally now, in the past almost everything had to be sent to the cloud first
• LLMs enable much better answers if you ask a voice assistant a question, or if you want a summary of anything

If that warrants branding everything as AI I'll leave up to you

Dumb question, why would anyone put electrical outlets in the ceiling?

ChatGPT is not a reliable source of information, I thought that was clear to everybody by now

The processor architecture does not influence RAM usage. (At least not if both architectures are 64-bit)

I mean you'd still expect that critical security fixes would land in testing, no?

Because you don't control third party libraries

A scope groups the initialization visually together, while adding the let app = app; feels like it just adds clutter - I'd probably just leave it mut in that case.

You can have setters that set private fields, there are also sometimes structs with mixed private and public fields

Yeah if you have the second option, use it, but if the struct has private fields it won't work.

If you're ever forced to do something the second way, you can also wrap it in braces, that way you end up with an immutable value again:

 rust

    
let app = {
  let mut app = ...
  ...
  app
};

  

Definitely the second one.

1. It avoids Mut
2. It makes clear that the initialization is over at the end of of the statement. The first option invites people to change some more properties hundreds of lines down where you won't see them.

I think the app I used was called "more physical keyboard layouts" or something like that. It's for connecting physical keyboards though. Never felt the need to have it for the virtual keyboard, since you have all of the weird letters behind a long press anyways.

Here's a link to the EurKey website: https://eurkey.steffen.bruentjen.eu