Unfortunately it is not, yours however is uninformed. One doesn't measure genetics in meters of DNA. The difference between chimps and humans is just 1% of genome, and their difference are not mostly cultural because they have almost identical DNA. Genetics is so complex that changes in a single gene can have enormous difference in the physiology of a system.

There are a lot of misconception about genetics and males/females differences, such that their differences are almost all cultural. Mainly because people confuse sexes and genders

Thanks for bringing it up, I didn't want to be "that guy"... People think as if complexity of genetics is measured in meters of DNA. When they'll find out that humans and chimps share 99% of DNA

Hahaha, expensive expandable expendables!

But yeah, I meant expensive

You are expansive guys...

We are talking of a case that, if true, would be a biological difference.

Sex is not irrelevant, and thinking that talking about biological differences is done to invalidate trans... I mean, it's a problem of the reader biases. The downvoters should think twice that the world is not made of people trying to invalidate trans people. I am fine with whatever a trans person does. Also because many trans people have biological characteristics that can be in between. Biologically, trans people are a universe of biological differences, they are not a single bucket. If I had to talk about trans people, I'd talk about trans people.

I have no idea if there is a difference in orientation abilities but if it exists, it would clearly be biological. I am happy it is a urban legend.

But nowadays too many people claim that male and female are identical with the exception of the penis. And it is pretty dangerous. Any trans person who transitioned can say how different their bodies and feelings are by just changing the amount of few hormones.

The fact that my comment has as many downvotes as upvotes demonstrated that the fact that biological differences exists are not so well known

Your assumption is that all meat tastes the same. Try eating a free range Argentinian steak and a cheap Tesco value steak... They are not the same.

I cannot judge grown meat, but meat taste greatly varies

That is scientifically untrue. Male and female have very different biology, this is why diseases have different distribution, and drugs different effects. Biological differences are the vast majority, and can be easily studied statistically

There are also cultural differences. But saying that most or all differences are cultural is pretty dangerous.

Edit. Corrected wrong edit

Your requests are quite easy to satisfy. Just avoid fancy cars.

Fiat Panda 4wd is a perfect example. Now, the question is, is it a car you'd like to drive?

Anyway, full of European and Japanese cars that satisfy your requirements. Most cars cheaper than 25K euros in Europe actually satisfy those requirements

Honestly this looks like a perfect way to make both python and bash more complex in a single move

Poi però è il parlamento e il governo che contano. E quelli li eleggono (direttamente o indirettamente) gli elettori. Non ho capito perché è un problema riconoscere gli errori evidenti degli elettori? Tu puoi aver votato persone illuminate tutta la vita, ma Berlusconi, bossi, salvini, meloni e tutti quelli che hanno rovinato questo paese sono stati eletti democraticamente da elettori incapaci di decidere per il bene comune. Mi sembra anche strano dover argomentare, è un fatto

Se ne conosci parecchie, vuol dire che non c'è un problema di classe dirigente, ma quelle persone intelligenti che conosci non vengono votate. Per cui si torna al problema degli elettori.

Out of curiosity, qualche nome di "gente intelligente" in politica che è votata dagli elettori italiani, illuminati, ma il cui voto di maggioranza viene traviato dai politici non votati? Così per capire chi votare

Ma tu faresti il politico in Italia?

L'Italia ha la classe dirigente che viene votata. Una persona competente non avrebbe voti, ma solo rogne e schiaffi in faccia. Quindi se ne sta a fare il proprio mestiere, piuttosto che entrare in politica.

La nostra classe dirigente culturalmente è assolutamente specchio degli elettori

Per finanziare il cambiamento climatico... Lo si fa già benissimo. Sono le contromisure a non essere finanziate.

Comunque il problema è dei votanti. Finché le persone votano forze politiche come l'attuale governo, che mette come regola prima della finanziaria il calmieramento salariale per i dipendenti dei ricchi, vuole la flat tax, non vuole le rinnovabili ma il gas africano, pensa che il diesel debba essere il futuro delle automobili... Nessun ricco verrà tassato e nessun cambiamento climatico risolto.

Bisogna educare gli elettori, rimandarli a scuola primaria

No, this is independent on AI. AI for big tech is a core product, like a car for BMW. The layoffs are completely unrelated to AI, and related to stock price and interest rates of borrowing money. None of the layoff employee has been substituted by AI. It's pure old school finance

Unrelated news in a single title just to attract readers. Usual sh**y to ride the AI hate bandwagon

What a weird title. They are completely 2 different, independent things. Just to be categorized with AI hype articles...

Why is that? Most car already have voice assistants to help in tasks that would ve distracting for the driver. What's the difference with chatGPT?

I drive automatic in Europe. Simply it is illegal to have a mobile in your hand while driving. Fees are very high, and the license is suspended minimum 2 weeks