That requires a human. That is my point. Lmao. Agents already can do this. Many things are cooked. Such as coding. Basically coding is the only thing where 100% of the job can be done by 1 person now that used to take 10. Other jobs like legal secretaries it’s maybe 1 out of 2 replacements. A data analyst can do with agents what used to take 5. But all agents, they need a babysitter handler. Which makes them glorified productivity tools. For actual replacement of the majority of jobs. You’d need fully autonomous agents. Ie agents that can literally run for years without any human intervention other than their boss asking them to do stuff. Instead of a handler having to use a tool. An agent that has full memory and doesn’t have to be reset constantly. All agents rn have to be reset constantly. That is the nature of a context window with a classical computer. Which can replace many jobs in specific niches. But it’s no where near close to even 20% of total jobs. And a productivity tool that eliminates a minority of white collar jobs via making the remainder of workers more efficient does not justify 750 billion dollars of capex.