A weird phrase is plaguing scientific papers – and we traced it back to a glitch in AI training data
That's an accurate name for the new toy, but not as fancy as "ai", i guess. Because we know that anything that comes out is gibberish made up to look like something intelligent.
Same here. At work we are using CO2 for fridges and the line as a stop gap where its possible, but for smaller units we are looking at a lot of substitution...
That has started to come under question, though. With vertical east-west facing panels the same effect can be achieved, although the effect might not be as drastic. That doesn't put a limit to machine height, although care must be taken to find an optimal distance between the panels.
You mean to say that Facebook isn't the main distraction of the -10s? Before Facebook it was TV that was the circus and low prices and no/hidden VAT provided the bread.
To keep Americans from leaving the country...
Vi frågade familjen vad vi ville ha och sedan delade vi upp tilllagningen mellan oss.
Unfortunately i think it's the same old extortion we've seen before. Trump Jr already posted "I wouldn't want to be the last country to cut a deal", so I guess we will see more if this. Ukraine stood up against it, I hope the rest of the world does to, but I'm afraid most wount.
I don't know how we define "enough" in this scenario, but as you allude to: in the end the USA is just some 400 million people buying things from overseas. Absolutely those who buy the most, and that is what drives the economy in many countries. It is what has picked up countries in SE Asia from poverty to industrialization.
Problem is that now when everything is more expensive in the US, the same people will stop spending. They might have spent the same money on products made in America, but those are precious few and just increased in price. So in effect everyone in America can now buy less for the same money and the industry capacity to produce what's demanded doesn't exist in short term. And in real estate, short term is 3-10 years.
The rest of the world? Well, most of the world just lost their biggest market. Of course, the demand that can't be produced domestically in the US will still be seen, but at a reduced rate, which will reduce the economic development world wide, until new markers are found. China still needs to sell, but the market for the high margin stuff is reduced.
In the end? I wouldn't be surprised if this stunt reduces world trade to such a degree it might be viewed as a notable side effect that carbon use went down. Trump might have managed to stop overconsumption like nobody else and with it energy demand. So despite doing the oil industries bidding and go against renewables, the shipping industry stand to loose enough trade that it might affect oil use world wide.
Inflation is defined as the increase of prices over a set period of time. It is in itself nothing, doesn't do anything and its singular purpose is to be able to say how much something costs today compared to yesteryear. If the price difference depends on a supply chock (something that affects the ability to produce, like a shortage), or a demand chock (suddenly everbody rejects Tesla) is all the same, it results in a price change and can therefore be compared using the measure inflation.
The internet as we know it is dead, we just need a few more years to realise it. And I'm afraid that telecommunications will be going the same way, when no-one can trust that anyone is who they say anymore.
As you have described the situation my question is if it would be similar to copyright Donald duck, despite not having drawn all possible poses and situations?
Exactly. Grok repeatedly generate a set of numbers, which, when keyed against its own list of words, spells out that Musk is spreading misinformation.
It just happens to be frequently...
I've wanted something like that thumb keyboard since I had my Xperia mini pro in 2010!
I think the IEA chart looks into where the energy began, not what it was used for. The 50% number rings true to me, at least for the heating in cold winters. As for summers, cooling is a heat issue as well, so that's where much of the energy is spent.
On a personal level, its price, but to enact a national strategy takes more, struggles with supply is one such thing. But the way to the strategy will work is through subsidies, like we've seen before.
Which has yet to be realised. Of it is that fast and easy to set up I'm we will see loads of them going up in notime. Specially now in the US, given how the mindset of the current administration.
Not to mention China which invests heavily in anything able to produce a watt.
Nothing to hinder advancing nuclear in the world's 2 biggest economies! Problem solved.
And nuclear cant possibly be built in time, so I guess we are screwed. Don't let perfect stand in the way of good. Doing nothing is not an option.
Oh, by all means. Build nuclear to your heart's delight, but in the meantime we need to build wind, solar and water as well.
The part that annoys me the most are the ones that think that it is either or. It's not. It's as much as possible as fast as possible to replace as much fossil in total volume as possible.