Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TO

she/her

Posts
60
Comments
1,251
Joined
2 yr. ago
  • How does this theory apply to say, gay marriage or healthcare in America?

    These are the counterexamples to the ratchet effect that demonstrate the theory is false.

    What the ratchet effect fails to encapsulate about neoliberalism is that neoliberals are not blocking progress to the left. Neoliberals are intentionally moving too slowly to the left to make meaningful, systemic change.

    Democrats move one step forward, Republicans move three steps back. So even though Democrats are moving us forward they do it so slowly that over multiple administrations we move backwards.

    Democrats never bothered to codify Roe v Wade. Republicans aggressively pursued Supreme Court appointments. Democrats refused to remove the filibuster when RBG died. Republicans removed the filibuster to get their Supreme Court picks through the Senate.

    Side note, it was Democrats for who removed the filibuster for most Presidential appointments, but not Supreme Court appointments. People tend to learn the wrong lesson for this as well. Republicans are bad faith actors. They are going to try to seize power no matter what Democrats do. The Democrats did not bring this upon themselves. Republicans did it.

    This distinction, that the Democrats are moving too slowly not blocking progress, matters because it is a core appeal of neoliberalism. If neoliberals completely blocked progress as the ratchet effect claims, people would more readily reject neoliberalism. Instead neoliberalism allows for incremental progress which at a glance can seem appealing. What people who partially internalize neoliberalism fail to realize is that our problems our systemic. Incremental change is too slow to correct criminal justice, wealth inequality, or stop climate change.

    In short we need a new meme. I've been thinking about two dancers moving slowly to a furnace on the right. Something like:

    🚪 💃 🕺🔥

    Where the dancer on the left keeps moving one step towards the exit while the dancer on the right takes three steps toward the furnace. This meme could probably use some work though or maybe a different approach altogether. I would definitely would like to hear people's thoughts.

  • Political Memes @lemmy.world
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Without critical thinking anyone can fall for fascism

    I see this idea everywhere, that people who fall for fascism or MAGA must not be intelligent enough because no intelligent person could fall for that. This goes beyond just wanting to call MAGA dumb, which is not the issue.

    This is effectively a thought terminating cliche, because we are lead to assume that nothing can be done about a person's intelligence.

    There are all kinds of people in the MAGA movement. The commonality between them all is a refusal to use their critical thinking skills or in some cases a lack of those skills altogether.

    Anyone can learn to think critically. We need to examine our neoliberal society to understand why people haven't or more often than not are refusing to think critically. And we need to encourage others to do the same.

  • Leave your house, and interact with other humans face to face.

    I do thanks.

    You have “theoretical” knowledge, but no real world, interacting with real people knowledge.

    My argument is informed by real interactions with real people including yourself.

    OK, you’re sucking your own d#$k, and I’m done with it. The “Well, akshully…” thing is a meme for a reason. And not a good one.

    Read my argument. It will take a few minutes of your time. Then you will have an informed opinion to critique it.

  • Critical thinking is a skill. Anyone can learn it. We can measure a person's ability by giving them tests and throwing a wide array of problems at them.

    Smartest implies general intelligence which we do not know how to measure. There is no test. IQ tests are a cultural knowledge test designed to marginalize and ostracize Black people masquerading as general intelligence tests.

    Regardless it is not even a case of not having critical thinking skills in all cases. But refusing to apply those skills in certain contexts.

    The smartest people can effectively have blind spots where they suspend these critical thinking skills for personal, moral, or ethical reasons that allow them to support amoral, unethical, and rapacious practices or outcomes without consciously choosing to embody these qualities themselves.

    edit: Also, even with what you read it should be evident that your critique of my argument is a straw man.

    The smartest people DON’T lack critical thinking skills.

    My argument is not that they lack those skills, although they could in theory.

    My argument you claimed to have read is this:

    They demand that you suspend critical thinking.

  • It is thankfully the vast majority of the time a case of being unwilling. People can change their minds, but it takes time. The better outcomes for society and the planet depended on convincing people to change their minds as soon as possible.

  • TLDR Neoliberalism and fascism are puzzles that can be solved so that people look for actual solutions to their problems. The problem for us is how to reach and educate everyone.

    And people still fall for it.’

    That's because it isn't an intelligence test. The smartest people you know can fall for these ideologies. They demand that you suspend critical thinking. Religion instills this in people and all the fascist has to do is convince a person their ideology falls under that umbrella of suspended critical thinking.

    But it goes further than that. Because people need not be religious in order to fall for these ideologies either. There is wide spread acceptance of neoliberal ideas in the Western world that causes a person to reject socialism out of hand. You've probably heard socialism doesn't work at one point or another, but probably heard little to support this thesis beyond the Soviet Union collapsed.

    Many people have partially internalized neoliberalism without considering it's implications and accepted those flaws as virtues. For example, a core principle of neoliberalism is that our societies' institutions, whether they be political or economic, are near flawless and beyond reproach. According to the neoliberal it is not the systems that need to change, but the people leading the systems.

    This walls people, who have accepted this idea, off from the majority of progressive and socialist policies which call for systemic change and wealth redistribution respectively. And it leaves them open to a relevant fascist idea. Rather than only changing the people running the system, change the people living within the system. This of course means genocide in the form of mass deportations and when that fails to be feasible mass executions.

    “There’s nothing wrong with you, THEY have fucked you over.”

    This is a much easier idea for a population, that has been living under neoliberal rule since 1981, to accept than the alternatives. Alternatives that would inherently involve restructuring society to be more inclusive both politically and economically. Such as but not limited to abolishing the electoral college, amending the constitution so that representation in Congress is proportional to the population, the redistribution of billionaire wealth through both taxation and mandated worker owned corporations. These ideas are workable alternatives to fascism, but they are a fundamental restructuring of our society.

    Beyond the inherent opposition from the owner class, military industrial complex, Republican Party, the right-wing infosphere the challenge is resolving the partially internalized neoliberal ideology in people's minds. To even begin to rethink a person's relationship to society in terms of work, government, and other people, a person has to understand that these are up for rethinking. Another prevalent neoliberal idea is that we live at the end of history and all social, political, and economic problems have been solved.

    If you benefit from the neoliberal society enough it can be trivial to ignore the people who have fallen through the cracks. But under a casual examination it becomes evident that injustice is still prevalent all over the world and that history did not end because politicians said it did. Even under the worst projected outcomes of climate change there will still be people. But unless a person fully internalizes that this neoliberal narrative that we live at the end of history is false, it can be difficult to see the impetus to meaningfully and rapidly change society.

    Thankfully, the challenge is not be to be intelligent enough, as we don't even understand general intelligence enough to measure it. Even a rejection of fascism after fully internalizing the ideology and its self-destructive implications, while necessary, is still insufficient. In addition to a rejection of fascism, the challenge is for enough of the population to have the knowledge and critical thinking skills to full internalize neoliberalism as a sales pitch for the scam that is late-stage capitalism and reject it. This is what it takes to even have the open-mindedness needed to fully internalize socialism and progressivism as viable solutions to our problems.

    On a side note, the idea that intelligence determines success or failure of a population with fascism is derived from our cultural obsession with intelligence. Everyone knows if you're a 'genius' and make a breakthrough for a corporation like Google, Facebook, or Amazon you make it rich. The only reason we care about being rich is because we know that all of our needs will be met in this society. The reason we know that is because we live in a capitalist society that only cares about profit for the owner class. So the only a main reason we care about intelligence is because we live in a capitalist society where if we make our corporate overlords wealthier we can have a slice of the pie.

    So I explained the essence of the problem. But now here's the problem. Maybe I've successfully convinced you or someone with this argument. Or maybe you've solved the fascist and neoliberal puzzles yourself. However you got here, to these conclusions, the challenge becomes an issue of scale. How do we convey this understanding to a national population of 340 million people and global population of 8 billion people before the fascist death camps are in full swing and/or climate change gets us. This is a logistical and educational problem that needs to be solved as soon as possible. edit: typos and clarification

  • The MAGA movement is a cult. Don Jr, the eldest son of the cult leader, is telling the other cultists this author is excommunicated from the cult. Thus the cultists know to ignore anything relating to this topic and can continue their blind devotion in peace.

  • Well no. Actually we aren’t supposed to trust the government. That’s why we have (in theory) a system of checks and balances.

    That's a conflation of two separate things. The checks and balances are for the different branches of government against each other and not we the people against the government.

    This idea that the population should have a general and perpetual distrust of their government no matter what is conspiracy theory logic.

    We should base trust and distrust on evidence.

  • Governments are comprised of people. Like any other people they should be judged on their actions. Blanket statements about distrusting governments and politicians no matter what they actually do is no different than distrusting science and experts. It's all part of how we got here.

  • You lied again in this comment too, multiple times. You went after the woman in your argument and now you're lying about that as well.

    You spent the whole day getting off to lying to me because you're a pathological liar. I'm glad you got your fix.

    I found a resource for you so you can get help. You shouldn't have to lie to people on the internet to get your fix. People could get hurt. Maybe this will help you ditch your fascism. I know they have all the best lies, but that doesn't make it okay.

    http://www.liarsanonymous.org/

  • Faced with facts you just go straight to the name calling.

    This is her objection.

    At the same time, Mohammad told her Democracy Now! interviewer: “One of the professors of medicine we have at Emory recently went to serve as a volunteer medic” in the IDF. That professor, she continued, “participated in aiding and abetting a genocide, in aiding and abetting the destruction of the healthcare system in Gaza and the murder of over 400 healthcare workers, and is now back at Emory so-called ‘teaching’ medical students and residents how to take care of patients”.

    This is mine.

    Fuck off fascist.

    Look how this fascist pretends the facts aren't there. I led with the facts.

    Just because you're pretending you can't read doesn't mean other people can't. No one is falling for the act.

    https://psychcentral.com/health/signs-pathological-liar#signs-of-a-pathological-liar

    lie indiscriminately about a wide range of topics

    tell untruths about minor events

    feel undeterred by the fear of getting caught

    experience a rush when you get away with lying

    continue to lie even when confronted with the truth

    My gut instinct was that pathological liars must be miserable. But after looking it up I was wrong.

    You must be having a great time. Go figure.

  • This is her objection.

    At the same time, Mohammad told her Democracy Now! interviewer: “One of the professors of medicine we have at Emory recently went to serve as a volunteer medic” in the IDF. That professor, she continued, “participated in aiding and abetting a genocide, in aiding and abetting the destruction of the healthcare system in Gaza and the murder of over 400 healthcare workers, and is now back at Emory so-called ‘teaching’ medical students and residents how to take care of patients”.

    This is mine.

    Fuck off fascist.

  • politics @lemmy.world
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    politics @lemmy.world
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    The Senate on Friday approved a Republican bill to fund federal agencies through September, averting a government shutdown hours before the midnight deadline after Democrats relented.

    The bill passed the Senate in a 54-46 vote, overcoming steep Democratic opposition. On Saturday, Donald Trump signed it into law, the White House said.

    politics @lemmy.world
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Trump Finally Found His Kind of Refugee

    196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Rulefishing

    I received this scam message today! I'm not even the first person to receive this scam and then make a post about it!

    [redacted]

    Hi, I’m Nicole! But you can call me the Fediverse Chick :D

    I’m a proud Polish girl from Toronto (29 y/o)

    I’m currently taking the pre-health sciences program at Toronto Metropolitan University hoping to get into the medical field someday!

    You can add me on Friendica: [redacted]

    Watch me stream on Peertube: [redacted]

    World News @lemmy.world
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    News @lemmy.world
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Femcel Memes @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Peach is Femcel Positive

    [Alt-text] Stella deduces she is not familiar with the contents of a book that Peach is investigating.

    I saw this text during my play through and immediately thought it should go in this community. And I eventually got around to that. =)

    politics @lemmy.world
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    politics @lemmy.world
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    From remains an unabashed centrist who believes that economic growth, not the economic populism of Sanders or Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, is the answer. “It’s important the critical mass in the Democratic party show that it’s the party of opportunity, responsibility and community but not the party of the left,” he insists.

    He also argues that the party should not be afraid to talk about law enforcement and developing a system of community policing rather than urging “defund the police”. Likewise it should embrace the idea of legal immigration and a border that is under control. From applauds governors who have made jobs available to people without college degrees.

    World News @lemmy.world
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Israel launches dozens of airstrikes on Syria despite rebel leader's peace pledge

    politics @lemmy.world
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    World News @lemmy.world
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    LGBTQ+ @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Bigots outraged over children’s book about pregnant trans man

    politics @lemmy.world
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    The message to Democrats is clear: you must dump neoliberal economics

    LGBTQ+ @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Trans health care under Trump may follow the abortion playbook and its Hyde amendment

    Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics. @slrpnk.net
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    LGBTQ+ @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    LGBTQ+ @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    News @lemmy.world
    ToastedPlanet @lemmy.blahaj.zone