thanks for this post. right now is an interesting time, which i think could be regarded as the first great migration from reddit to lemmy and the wider fediverse.
There is currently a huge wave of automated spambot sign-ups on other Lemmy instances. This post explains how lemm.ee will respond.
when you're on the lemm.ee instance, scroll to the very bottom of the page and click on the "instances" link. that page shows "linked" instances on the left column and "blocked" instances on the right column. "linked" are the instances we're federated with(grows naturally), and "blocked" are the instances that sunaurus elected to defederate with. you can go to any instance and look at their lists too, even without an account, so they are very publicly visible.
is that what you're looking for?
side-note: before today our blocked instances list was empty every time i checked, which i do fairly often.
yes! thanks so much.
The Jim Yoshii Pile-Up - Seattle, WA
to watch the rain
walk out in the rain
stand under the rain
to watch the rain
walk out in the rain
stand under the rain
Aquatic Ambiance, from Donkey Kong Country for SNES (1995)
a favorite of mine.
according to this page the composer was david wise: https://www.discogs.com/release/1201362-Unknown-Artist-DK-Jamz-The-Original-Donkey-Kong-Country-Soundtrack
i'm no coder but i wonder if this little guide would help you: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/en/administration/theming.html
please compare 'anarchism' and 'classical liberalism' and 'libertarianism'
i know only a little bit about each philosophy. they seem so similar, and i wonder, are they really just the same thing in spirit? or would you make certain distinctions? i'm seeking more understanding. i know that each has a different history, but i am asking about the philosophies themselves, separate from their manifestations.
additionally, are there other titled philosophies that are more or less the same as these?
i have read some definitions of so-called "classical liberalism" and they vary. some say that it is a philosophy that isn't attached to any political agendas, but other definitions bind it to certain political agendas. i presume that so-called anarchism and libertarianism are also defined in different ways depending on who you ask.
it seems to me that many of the terms people use to categorize each other are too ambiguous, over-simplify, become perverted over time, and cause too much misunderstanding. maybe we should rid ourselves of these category conventions altoge