I just write in a language few people really knows well. Not like I expect AI to do a great job of basing off my code.
I only used LLM-generated code once. I tested and made modifications to see if it was I want. It worked out.
In G'MIC, there's repeat(num_of_iters,_var_name,code();); on JIT code, and repeat code_block done outside of JIT. It has while, for, dowhile on JIT too. Other than repeat, there is only do while, and for which is while outside of JIT.
Note: _var_name, can be omitted. So, if you need to just repeat a code N times, that can be removed.
Eh, I rather write code by hand no matter how long it takes.
I use KDE Kate for my coding. Scripting more accurately to some users, but I don't find a meaningful distinction.
Pass. I rather use PyCharm for Python development.
Yeah. repeat() is unique to a few language. I think just Scala, and G'MIC has it. I use the second one. It's more convenient than say for(p=0,p<5,++p,);. Sometimes, repeat(5,); suffice.
I actually use repeat(iterations,index_name(optionall),);. No need for i++ or ++i for loop in many cases.
I had this problem only once. Luckily, I do not need recursion. I know my way using iterative process.
Ok, I kind of like this.
Not what I'm saying. Just saying if I need speed, I'd use a naturally faster language.
Numpy is good for that. But, I gravitate toward naturally faster langs where I don't need to import a library for speed. I use Python for simple, dumb scripts.
Nah. I only used AI as a last resort, and in my case, it has worked out. I cannot see myself using AI for codes again.
I don't understand the code, but it's good to see you doing things.
Sometimes, I just rewrite my code until it is good enough. Other times, I leave it to my memory, so I can figure it out later. And others, I'm just not happy about it, like the times I did bigbin2dec and it would only work well with something like thread-ripper.
It means that I made changes to code, so that it can work with any multi-threading strategy. G'MIC is a interpretative language with JIT support, and you don't have any control over automated multi-threading strategy. It can be thread 0 to thread N linearly, or even interleaved. So, the workaround is to make a image of size equal to cpus count, and do the multithreading there.
Yeah, I love image processing, I worked on it for 8+ years now.
I use it for scripting too. I don't need Python as much as before nowaday.
As always, I do image processing. I'm a G'MIC filter developer. Recently, did some code changes to my combinatorics tools to be insensitive to multi-threaded strategy.
Just use Rust. Eazy Peazy. C++ will likely be still be used because it's just not realistic for some softwares to switch to a safer programming language.
Uh, that would be infuriating to see. (Yes, I can see tabs in KDE Kate)
Looking for a HTML4 editor.
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/20450422
Right now, I would like a easy editor that allows me to not worry about HTML4 syntax, and simply adjust the rendered text, while I can see the HTML source code.
The reason I need something like this is that I sometimes do make note() in G'MIC which looks like this:
undefined#@gui:_=separator(),_=note("<center><b>- Additional Information -</b></center>")See that inside note("")? That's HTML4. And while I can do without a editor, I feel that it would be better to use an actual editor where I can copy and paste.
Looking for a HTML4 editor.
Right now, I would like a easy editor that allows me to not worry about HTML4 syntax, and simply adjust the rendered text, while I can see the HTML source code.
The reason I need something like this is that I sometimes do make note() in G'MIC which looks like this:
undefined
#@gui:_=separator(),_=note("<center><b>- Additional Information -</b></center>")
See that inside note("")? That's HTML4. And while I can do without a editor, I feel that it would be better to use an actual editor where I can copy and paste.
My code can look something like this (Without wrap lines):
::: spoiler spoiler
undefined
<b>Palette CLI Information</b>\n\n <i>Main Source of Palettes - </i><a href=\"https://lospec.com/palette-list/"> LoSpec Palette List</a>\n\nPalette Number -- pal number_id = pal name_id -- Full Palette Name by Author[if mentioned]\n\n1 -- +pal 0 = +pal bw -- Black & White\n2 -- +pal 1 = +pal rgb -- Red-Green-Blue\n3 -- +pal 2 = +pal b_rgb -- Black with Red-Green-Blue\n4 -- +pal 3 = +pal bw_rgb
Is there a better algorithm for converting big binaries into decimal?
At the moment, I am stuck with using single-precision float, and double-precision float. So, the maximum represent-able value for single is 1<<24 while for double, it is 1<<53.
Because of this, I made the following script here - https://gist.github.com/Reptorian1125/71e3eec41e44e2e3d896a10f2a51448e .
Allow me to clarify on the script above. On the first part, rep_bin2dec does is to return the converted values into the status. So, when I do ${} or variable=${rep_bin2dec\ ???}, I get the status string.
On the second part, rep_bin2dec_base is the basis for getting rep_bin2dec to work. _rep_bin2dec_base prints the base_10M array into a string.
So, how does rep_bin2dec_base converts a big binary into big decimal?
- If the binary image is less than dimension of 54, then the script will use 0b{} which allows me to directly convert binary to decimal, and 0b is a binary literal much in the same way that Python and C++ does it. From this point, it's pretty obvious
I made a Brainfuck interpreter within G'MIC (Shell-Like language for image processing)
Three things before I'll get to the relevant details.
- Brainfuck is a esoteric languages which uses 8 characters. I'll leave details here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck
- G'MIC is a language largely inspired by bash languages and one other shell scripting language, and partly inspired by C++ for JIT compilation. It's two languages in one as in one outside of JIT and one inside of JIT. It's main purpose is image processing, and it can do 3D things too, basically image-related things. It's turing-complete, so making files has been done with it. Even making a executable compiled program is possible in practice (but, I would point to doing C++ and compile there instead).
- I am a G'MIC filters developer.
Anyways, I taken some time to code up a Brainfuck interpreter within G'MIC. It wasn't that hard to do once I understood what Brainfuck is as a language. I did one earlier than this, but I had to have users define inputs beforehand. Recently, I created rep_cin command t
Is there a text editor that would allow me to create syntax highlighting easily?
Basically just the title said. The situation is basically I use a Domain-Specific Language called G'MIC, and to this day, I haven't found a satisfactory answer to the issue of lack of syntax highlighting. At the moment, I am using KDE Kate as it's pretty good at structuring the code with their find/replace feature, tab indicators, and multi-window support.