I've always thought of it like the prime directive: you shouldn't interfere, you should only be there in a supportive fashion when it happens.
But have you considered that he who denied it, in fact, supplied it?
I'm actually going to vote for the 0% fascist instead.
My confusion about how people find Dr Stone enjoyable continues.
Won't stop me from voting PSL.
Maybe Mao is just enjoying a really pretty sunrise.
John Brown was funded by Iran and Russia, so who's the real bad guy?
It's not subjective, it's an uncomfortable truth that people actively avoid confronting. And none of those "ethical situations" involve asking internet strangers whether it would go well in a stroganoff.
The logical kind. The answer to "is there any ethical way to eat sturgeon?" is a simple no.
Please learn the the difference between an IP address and a geo IP location.
IP location only gives people the city you're in, and Swatting is pretty much a unique feature to America.
- I already have all that info on my Facebook profile.
- I'm not an influencer anyways.
- You don't seem to know how geo-IP lookups work, so I'm unsure where your confidence is coming from.
How exactly would that information put a person in harms way?
That's a gross accusation. Most people have more info on their Facebook profile
Using the element selector from uBlock on the popup worked for me.
Yes, the person you're replying to is lying. That's why they're avoiding providing any sort of proof of their outlandish claim.
Y'all are cool. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming that Lemmygrad was defederated for any sort of outsized rule-breaking behavior from their users on this instance.
I'll clear that one up since everyone here seems to be boldly making inaccurate claims. They say that because media outlets and people will spend more time analyzing and critiquing Trump eating McDonalds or typing covfefe than the US, say, drone striking innocent Afghani people or the utter shit show that Libya has become due partially to the efforts of Clinton and Obama.