Why Were Communist Revolutions Reversed in the USSR and China? (2008+)
A scientific evaluation of history must focus on the study of revolutionary movements. We must draw upon what is positive in these experiences and learn from the negative in order to advance beyond them.
Four great revolutions against capitalism have marked the forward thrust of humanity: the Paris Commune, the Russian Revolution, the Chinese Revolution, and the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution (GPCR). Each revolution reflected the importance of the principal antagonisms between the capitalist class and the proletariat, or working class.
The struggle for state power is inseparable from the struggle between correct and incorrect ideas about how to win, keep, and consolidate it. This struggle is known as the struggle against revisionism—the ideas and practice of the class enemy within the communist movement. This struggle will continue until world communism is achieved and consolidated.
Right Opportunism: The Long Term Error of the Communist Movement
Revolutionaries, once
China: The Reversal of Socialism (Part 4 of 6) Fascist methods expose Hua Kuo-Feng
THE WORKER / November 19, 1976
Mao Tse-Tung once warned us, at the beginning of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution that the Communist Party of China had to be vigilant against revisionism, because, he said, it is possible for a Party to become fascist almost overnight. While being confused and confusing on many other matters, he couldn't have been more right on this one. Ask his wife.
Since the crushing of the GPCR with Mao's help China has been ruled by fascism. We've already explained our views on Mao, his wife, and her cohorts. They were "centrists" who tried to straddle the class struggle and are now, with the defeat of the left, being cleaned out by the right.
Mrs. Mao and Co. will never be heard from (unless her crowd stages a counter-coup). She will never get a trial. Most likely she won't even be seen again. From one end of the world to the other this is thought to be "normal". It is an outrage! It is fascist! It has nothing to do with Communism; with respect fo
China: The Reversal of Socialism (Part 3 of 6) Pinochet Mourns Mao
CHALLENGE / December 2, 1976
Last week we saw how the Cultural Revolution in China expanded our understanding of how socialist society actually works in the areas of culture, education and health. We also saw that the gains of the Cultural Revolution are being systematically reversed by the revisionists (capitalists who call themselves socialists) who rule China today. This week, we look at the advances made in the factories, the fields and the government offices, and how these advances are being replaced by policies which restore capitalism.
Before the Cultural Revolution of the late 1960s, Chinese industry was shot through and through with capitalist practices like piece-rate wage systems, bonuses for hard work and strongly hierarchical management. In great struggles, the workers threw out this system which encouraged individualism, competition among the workers, and striving for material wealth above all else. They got rid of the bonuses and sharply reduced the difference in
Friend, the placing of military bases does not address the Marxist meaning of imperialism. Summary of Lenin’s definition of imperialism here and two brief quotes:
Imperialism, or the domination of finance capital, is that highest stage of capitalism in which this separation [money capital & productive capital] reaches vast proportions. The supremacy of finance capital over all other forms of capital means the predominance of the rentier and of the financial oligarchy; it means that a small number of financially “powerful” states stand out among all the rest. The extent to which this process is going on may be judged from the statistics on emissions, i.e., the issue of all kinds of securities. (Lenin, Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism, p. 238-9)
To Lenin, imperialism is the dominance of finance capital. Specifically, he does not define imperialism as it is generally defined, namely, the building of empires by subjugation of territories [with military bases] and the exploitation of these colonial territories for new materials and as markets. (The Essential Lenin, introductory text to Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism)
Everyone should pick up any book by Xi Jinping: (1), (2), (3), (4), (5). And when one sees how evasive he is, probably within a chapter or two, I recommend The Great Leap Backward (1978) (ML analysis) or Is China An Imperialist Country? (2014) which is by a Maoist group but has more updated sources. Also notice how tertiary the evidence is (Pelosi failing to meet an African delegation) in the video linked below. What sort of evidence is all of this? Does it qualify as historical-materialist analysis without further context? No.
U.S. & China will make world war; workers can make revolution – April 2, 2021
Facing the ‘Thucydides Trap’…the military must step up its efforts. —Xu Qiliang, Vice-chairman of China’s military
[China] stated that war with the United States is inevitable...When you [U.S.] send an armored brigade combat team anywhere in the world...you have made a strategic decision to fight and win —Major General Richard Coffman of U.S. military
Imperialist rivals China and the U.S. are caught in the “Thucydides Trap,” an inevitable drive towards war when a rising power threatens to displace the established world power. Driven by their need for maximum profit and world supremacy, the capitalists are on the course toward World War III.
From signing the Iran deal to challenging the world’s currency, top-dog w