
The credits list Minoru Shiraishi as the author of the song. I guess Kaorin is a nickname for one of the voice actresses: Kaori Fukuhara.
So maybe just a song made only for lucky star, so he could confess his love for her? đ

On the flip side, I hate how everything seems to be an isekai these days. Feels like a cheap and overused plot point by now.
I would much rather watch an entire series covering the ârising star animator on the verge of burning outâ part, than the âshe's spirited away into her favorite childhood animeâ part.

It worked for me out of the box with no config changes (ubuntu 24.10, wayland, nvidia 565 driver), but there are some comments on protondb about it crashing if you have an integrated graphics card in your machine.
Suggested solutions there are either disable the integrated graphics card in bios, or use -preferNvidia launch option (presumably only if you actually have an nvidia card, but no idea, canât test myself).

Nausicaä

If the universe/big bang didnât exist, would numbers conceptually still exist? i.e zero is still zero regardless of whether any matter exists, right?
If there is no form of existence in which math doesnât exist, then everything ultimately exists necessarily. It has to exist, as a result of being derived from the infinity of math.
Everything is just math, and it therefore has no option but to exist.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_universe_hypothesis

The Most Stupidest Game Ever - Re-duh!

The Glimpse Editor project shut down because there werenât enough contributors, and the founder didnât have enough time to do everything.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210531113823/https://glimpse-editor.org/posts/a-project-on-hiatus/
âŚand yeah it wasnât just a rename, their github readme suggests they were making UX, accessibility, settings, and plugin changes to make it âenterprise readyâ (not sure on the specific details of that though).
https://web.archive.org/web/20210729071541/https://github.com/glimpse-editor/Glimpse

Itâs a joke (from the author of the article and not a quote from Zuckerberg). Usually in the format of âxyz will continue until morale improvesâ, where xyz is something that is likely to reduce morale, thus implying that xyz will continue indefinitely.
In this case the morale is of those forced to consume metaâs ai slop, i.e facebook users.
An alternate worded headline would be: âAI content will continue on Facebook regardless of whether users like itâ.

What stops the botters from setting up their own instances to create unlimited users for manipulating votes?
I guess admins also have to be on top of detecting and defederating from such instances?

Defining something as âartâ or ânot artâ seems a rather simplistic worldview.
Does art need to be âappreciated by anyoneâ to be âartâ, is art only what is popular, or simplistic enough to be understood by a mass audience?
Is stencilling over/tagging a banksy vandalism, or is it a making a statement on the middle class hypocrisy of its widespread acceptance of street works from one author and the derision of others?
Which of these are âartâ or ânot artââŚ
- banksy later tagging his own work
- banksy later tagging his own work but not claiming authorship
- banksy later tagging his own work, but publicly saying someone else did it, and that he doesnât approve
- someone else tagging banksyâs work, and banksy publicly saying that he approves
- banksy stencilling over the mona lisa (on the actual paint)
- banksy stencilling on the outside wall of fallingwater
- banksy stencilling something regarded as offensive by some people
- banksy stencilling something you like on the front of your house
- banksy stencilling something you donât like on the front of your house, but is widely liked by others
- somebody else stencilling the same thing on the front of your house
Seems like the rules for what is/isnât art could be quite complicated. There would be endless possible scenarios to judicate on. Not to mention, who gets to decide? Popular vote, experts, the owner of the substrate?
Much simpler to let art be undefined and interpretable however one wishes.

One persons vandalism is another persons art.
No doubt if someone else claimed responsibility for it, it would already have been washed off.
Permanently Deleted

Based on their 2022 report, only half of their expenses were on software development costs - around $220m, and itâs not clear what portion of that was on Firefox vs other projects.
https://assets.mozilla.net/annualreport/2022/mozilla-fdn-2022-fs-final-0908.pdf
In terms of revenue: around $100m was from sources other than Google.
Therefore, it seems plausible to me that Firefox development could still be funded with $100m of annual revenue. At a smaller level no doubt, but still in existence nonetheless.

So with a sufficiently small volume of space, we would have an actual nothing again? Or the foam can go infinitely small?

- Kare Kano
- True Tears
- Kimagure Orange Road
- Kimi ga Nozomu Eien
- Voices of a Distant Star
- Saikano
Some of them might make you cry.

Hidamari Sketch

âCowboy Bebop and John Wick creators âŚSunrise created John Wick?

Does the cat crash if it nudges it twice and itâs on the floor?