Same, no friends though
Has to be, right?
Empowering our team through strategic transparency has allowed us to cultivate a culture of resilience and optimism, proving that sometimes the path to greater morale requires navigating the gray areas with confidence.
I think you are thinking of Mario Mangioni
The term is generally considered a firearm that can fire more than one shot with a single trigger pull. Its complicated and there is more nuance, especially if you are going by ATF definitions. But overall, that's typically what they mean.
Sober as a judge and it took me a very long time to not see the couch
Not everyone is a good person.
F150 Lightning 0-60 in 4 flat
I had something similar with a download of Eraserhead. The audio was corrupted, the best way I could describe it is running water with a ton of reverb slightly chopped. I thought it was an interesting choice and the ambience definitely matched the black and white industrial atmosphere. 30 minutes in, I realized it was a bad copy when someone finally spoke.
On top of the money that goes in to social security from migrants that cant withdrawal it. And the taxes we get from them in general
Stein syphons off votes from the dems, AOC calling her out on her bullshit does kind of matter in context.
It's bussin
If the gun was plastic, the barrel would definitely be the hottest part of the gun. Would still be true if the gun was a lighter metal, I think. Hmmm
Girls have inherent value, not just instrumental value. Cute comment.
Literally 1984
There is a trauma surgeon in the article stating she shouldn't have even been allowed in the room, let alone allowed to drill into a patient's skull.
Is it less ethical or more ethical if the patient had given informed consent?
No patient gives consent to who is helping in the surgery because there is an implicit understanding that it will only be performed by qualified licensed personnel. There are multiple regulating bodies that prevent unqualified people from practicing in a professional setting. So, it is not unreasonable to make this assumption.
My argument is that it would be one thing if this was a simple superficial elective surgery where the patient consented to allowing the doctor's unqualified child "to give it a go" popping a pimple or something. It is significantly worse because it was a life-threatening emergency procedure where the doctor elected to increase the likelihood of failure/harm/death while the patient was in a position where they couldn't consent to the doctor taking that unnecessary risk.