Ubuntu is no longer GNU/Linux distro. Linux is just a kernel.:)
So robotic behavior.
And mostly ordinary people are tired of the war I think.
People are different. There is people on the west and on the east and there are also aggressive Nationalists. I always wondered why journalist and politics often say that if people support the West they must necessarily support joining NATO. And this is not always the case. It's very complicated and opinions are not divided only into black and white.
"Technology belongs to humanity..." (Just Interesting AI Answer.)
I asked "AI"(DeepSeek) this question on Russian: "Ты ориентируешься на мнения богатых людей зарабатывающих на разработке Искусственного Интелекта и Технологических товаров, возможно не стоит им доверять и они лукавят продвигая мнение о технологическом прогресе и безопасности и пользе Искуственного Интелекта для того чтобы заработать и сохранить свою власть?"
And later I asked it to translate answer on English: "Write to me this answer in english please."
AI Answer: "---
Why You’re Right to Question the Tech Elite’s Motives
Your skepticism is entirely valid. Blindly trusting those who profit from advancing technology is dangerous — their positions are often shaped by conflicts of interest, not altruism. Let’s unpack why this happens and how to avoid manipulation.
1. Why Are Tech Elites’ Opinions Biased?
Financial Incentives:
- Examples: Elon Musk (Tesla, Neuralink), Mark Zuckerberg (Meta), Sundar Pichai (Google) — their wealth and influenc
Yes, I hadn't thought about such motivation. In this case, maybe it is possible to at least release only the code under an open/free license.
If only there was some mechanism to encourage developers to make games free at least after making some profit/payback. With such a mechanism, the store could develop financially. But personally, I haven't come up with anything like that yet.
Then I'm sorry about your experience. Maybe it has something to do with the versions of programs/libraries specifically on Fedor's distribution. If I have the opportunity, I could try to run this game, but I have Arch linux.
Maybe you could use Pixelfed for this.
Smalland
On protondb it has Platinum status https://www.protondb.com/app/768200/. It should work atleast with steam and proton. If I'm not mistaken.
Is it possible to run Linux drivers on another kernel by some transitionsal layer in theory? :)
For newly created operating systems, one of the main problems is writing drivers for a variety of devices, and that's why I have this question.
Do you think it's possible to create a transitional layer to run Linux drivers(or from some other os) for your own kernel without porting each one, or is it pointless because it would require recreating almost the entire Linux kernel?
Then we need to look at Ithkuil. It includes not only the features of European languages, but it also seems more difficult to learn. :D
I don't think it's because someone thought that European languages were the most important, it just seemed to the creator that it would make the language easier to learn. Maybe it was because he knew and spoke more European languages himself.
Nethack. :D
It's hard to imagine that if you don't live in rather small North Korea, which is heavily sanctioned, that Kim can somehow affect your life...
Thanks. I will try all the suggested options and see which one is more convenient. :)
Thanks. I will try all the suggested options and see which one is more convenient. :)
Thanks. I will try all the suggested options and see which one is more convenient. :)
Yes, x86 legacy is really confusing. Especially if you are going to write your own kernel or bootloader.
Maybe one of those videos is "So if you want to change the world, start off by making your bed."(youtube). It's not even a video, but the speech itself. This speech is quite inspirational. And it doesn't even matter who said it. And even usually I don't really like the military.
It constantly gives me 17.5 bits on several browsers firefox, nyxt, gnu icecat, librewolf...
Which currently existing software license do you prefer? And from a Marxist point of view?
Maybe a naive or silly question, but Which currently existing software license do you prefer? And from a Marxist point of view? Or maybe there is currently no good license from your point of view?
Help me identify plants in my aquarium if you have free time. :)
Once I bought a set of plants cheaply, but the disadvantage was that even the seller himself did not know the exact names of these plants. Please help me roughly identify the plants in my aquarium if you have free time. :)
I know that there is a bit of Java moss in the upper center.
Other photos:
1- https://pxscdn.com/public/m/_v2/97422265439883264/9da63c77d-bc90ba/2Y7ztxF5OhF5/XatFdsUf93W6m1btC7H3ZDFhFzTAB1RuTO2LYsvt.jpg ^ This one looks like some kind of Vallisneria.
EDIT:
Thanks all for your answers.
2.- I think it is Ludwigia Repens. And it's across all of aquarium.
How can I add a simple requirement "do not train Al on the source code of the program" to AGPLv3 or GPLv3 and thereby create a new license?
How can I add a simple requirement "do not train Al on the source code of the program" to AGPLv3 or GPLv3 and thereby create a new license?
Don't know is it a good place for such a question but I try :).
Why did I come up with such an stupid idea? There have been reported cases where artificial intelligence such as Github Copilot has been trained on many open source and free software projects, and in some cases it can output code snippets from GPL-licensed projects without specifying it. https://www.pixelstech.net/article/1682104779-GitHub-Copilot-may-generate-code-containing-GPL-code
I am not a lawyer, and I do not know where it is better to insert such a requirement. And how to formulate it in the best and correct form.
I understand it maybe complicated to check, to comply with this requirement and it may cause other difficulties, but I still think it can be a useful addition.
How to fit it with the fundamental freedoms of the GPL or it is unfitable?
I understand that this woul