I built an office shed in my back yard. Almost all the grass is gone where I walk between the back door and the shed. I do this fairly frequently, but I'd think still quite a bit less than an even lightly trafficked hiking path.

I'll put some stepping stones out there eventually.

My laptop booted in to Windows once. I missed my first guess on the key to enter setup and USB storage didn't have a higher boot order than internal storage.

Gross. I didn't know that. I do occasionally use AirBnB. I'm aware of their impact on the rental market, so I favor hotels most of the time. But there have been a few occasions in recent years where I was traveling in a larger group and an AirBnB made more sense. But no more of that.

I looked in to this a little, and Joe Gebbia is no longer the CEO, but he is still on the board. Still a good enough reason to boycott.

Risk is also a factor re: self hosting.

• You're exposing potential attack vectors, which is particularly concerning if self hosting = home hosting.
• Also with home hosting, it's probably against your ISP's TOS. It is for mine (I actually read it!). Will they do anything? Probably not. But it's a risk.
• You could face legal issues if someone posts illegal content, since you're hosting it. Even unwittingly.

Those concerns are what stop me. Because I otherwise think I'd enjoy hosting a little corner in the fediverse.

NixOS is a declarative distro. Meaning it you can declare pretty much every aspect of it from what software is installed to how the system is configured from a config file.

Using your calandar example, you can list Thunderbird (or whatever) as a package you want in the configuration and it will be installed. You can also use that same configuration on another machine and produce the same environment.

Relevant to the original point, since all your software is listed in a text file, you can easily see exactly what's installed.

Void for desktop/laptop. These are the things I like about it.

• Rolling release
• Initial installation is minimal, and doesn't foist a specific DE or other unessential software on me.
• No systemd
• Nothing similar to Arch's AUR. I know a lot of people love it, but I do not. I mention as the distros are similar.

Debian for my server. But I plan to migrate to Devuan.

• Stable and well tested
• Huge package selection
• Pretty ubiquitously supported. If for whatever reason what you want to run isn't in the repo, .deb packages and apt repos are often available.
• Minimal installation available.

They could just deny access without verification. But thinking more broadly there'll certainly be ways to fool the system. But, shouldn't have to in the first place.

There are a few qualifiers here. It's for some users in UK and Australia trying to access sensitive content. And it sounds like it's reaction to laws against youth under 16 accessing social media. In Australia, anyway. So the scope is currently fairly limited.

Should we be worried that this will pave the road for larger privacy abuses? Yes, of course we should. That scenario feels likely, in my opinion.

Is this enough to convince my friends to use a different platform? Not yet.

I'll try this! I used to use caldav via my mail provider with DAVx5, but I had problems with it not retaining notification settings with recurring events.

I don't know if that's a problem with their caldav server, DAVx5, or my phone's calendar. But worth trying with radicale and see if it works.

My kneejerk response to this was negative. "Oh, another distro spinoff". But I read the article and the front page of their site. It feels to me it's trying to be to Fedora what Mint is to Ubuntu. And I hear good things about Mint.

While I take issue with both base distros (Ubuntu, Fedora). I'm also of the opinion that Fedora is better, relatively speaking. So, maybe this has more of a place than I initially thought.

For those like myself who hadn't heard of GoToSocial and are curious what it is but don't want to watch a video, it is as you might guess an ActivityPub based microblogging platform. With a focus on smaller instances capable of running on low end hardware. According to their site, anyway. https://gotosocial.org/

It's a novel idea. But despite the article's claims this is not a practical alternative to a laptop in planes, coffee shops, etc. Nor is a minipc inherently more serviceable than a laptop as others have pointed out.

For traveling, if it's a longer trip, it almost makes sense to me as you'd have it set up for a while. Though I'd do a mini ITX system. The ones with external power supplies and no drive bays or expansion slots are pretty small. But even then, I don't feel like this would be significantly better than a laptop. And that's a lot to buy for a niche use case.

Edit: spelling and grammar

By first gen I meant not a switch 2. I'm not too particular about which version or revision.

Yeah, the price point would have to be low enough to be worth it for the few console specific titles that'd interest me.

A search of the comments didn't turn up any mention of seedboxes. So I'll throw that hat in the ring as an option.

I won't. And not even due to the bad PR.

I never bought a Switch. Thought about it, but never got around to it. I guess I'm just not the target audience.

Though now in thinking about it, I bet I can pick up a good condition used Switch on the cheap once this comes out. Maybe I'll get the first gen Switch after all!

On a Pi4.

I was running it on a VM on the home server but then any downtimes that machine had were also HA downtimes. Decided that mattered enough to run it on it's own hardware.

Clickbait title is unhelpful but did it's job in making me curious. Guessing it's this for those that don't want to watch a video.

https://www.dexerto.com/gaming/european-union-makes-legislative-change-that-will-change-in-game-purchases-forever-3167394/

Maybe self host your own VPN on a VPS and connect the jellyfin server as a client as well as any other devices you want to see that jellyfin server as other clients and configure the VPN server to not override your default routing and to allow clients to see each other? In my head I don't think that would conflict with your protonVPN connection.

Your traffic would be encrypted between devices so I wouldn't say https is nessesary and thus no certs needed.

The rubs that occur to me are that I'm not sure you can do this on a free tier VPS which is the only option I see given your financial limitations. And your devices all need to be able to connect to said VPN.

Edit: Slightly less worse English.