The meme is saying to make black and white judgements about any image you see, and disregard it completely depending on what was used to create it. It's closer to hate then encouragement imo.

I think a lot of us mods feel that AI should be allowed so long as it is not low quality and serves some purpose

Pretty much sums up my view of it. It's a shame it's vilified since it's good at making short comics and memes. I'd also rather original ai content then reposts personally.

I can understand certain subs being against it, like traditional art subs and subs relating to shows where movie stills are preferred (the star trek ones for instance). But in the end, this is a meme sub.

That being said, it's seriously polarizing and every post with even a hint of AI turns into a fight. Tagging is at least a small compromise but I don't think it will do much without filtering. Maybe an option would be to ask users who wish to post AI content to use an alt classified as a bot, so users can filter it that way while we wait for a proper flair system.

Woot, an other gatekeeping "meme" so we can all argue in the comments with each other.

ChatGPT can receive the users general location. Its like a tool, the model needs to ask to receive it.

It's still quite impressive since it narrowed it down to my county using the trees and general geographical feel (there was a small mountain chain in the background), but it's clear when it actually receives the location information in the last reasoning step.

They will definitely shoot at it.

No fun allowed.

The laws that apply to a person's likeness in your example don't apply to an art style.

Currently, it isn't clear if consent is required for style. It's highly transformative but we will only know after the lawsuits are finished and any new law is put in place. Depends on location as well I'm guessing.

It's basically fanart being banned but worse, and everybody is cheering for the copyright industry winning and censoring us again.

I wonder if we'll run out of styles in a few years or if it will only apply to the ones with lawyers and lots of money behind them.

Make sure you donate to the Archive and not Change.org . It's easy to click the link, sign the petition and then donate to the wrong organisation. Change.org is kind of scummy like that.

If you sign their open letter, be sure to donate to the archive itself separately after and not to change.org. Seems like they ask for donations to send emails and it doesn't actually go to the archive?

100%. I don't share the persons views, I just think OP is wrong for jumping straight to calling him Hitler in our current climate, where the state of Israel labels any criticism towards it the same way.

An average school bus is 35 feet. So that's the lion's one leap kill zone. Never get closer then one school bus from a lion.

It's a great way to bring up insurance costs for a car dealership. A lot of broken windshields.

But when they persisted in asking Him, He straightened up, and said to them, “Those who are without a billion among you, let them be the first to lay the basket and fasten the frame for the blade.”

I wouldn't exactly call any reservist currently occupying Ukrainian land a civilian. It's a tough subject and there are valid points on each side.

That being said, it's not antisemitic to view idf and ex-idf currently occupying palestinian land as valid targets.

If you want to talk about if it's moral, follow the link and argue with him. I'm talking about the "if you are critical of the state of israel, you are a nazi" aspect.

Yes all occupiers are valid military targets

I said soldiers occupying Palestine. Not "Jews across the world".

No I very clearly said IDF soldiers.

Unless these soldiers decide to leave occupied Palestine they are not ex-soldiers because they are actively occupying and can be summoned for combat.

He isnt saying "kill all israelis".

to say everyone not willing to take whatever punishment is out there for refusing is fair game to kill pretty far out there to me.

Currently, it's 100 days in prison from a quick google search.

So yes, anyone willing to commit genocide instead of spending 100 days in prison is absolutely fair game.

That's also how these things usually work. I'm certain the percentage of soldiers in the Russian army that actually want to be there is very low, and they have to deal with a lot more then just 100 days in prison if they refuse. They must be mowed down regardless.

Lmao, try to make the same argument for anything else. "I don't want people to paint. Most are seriously bad at it and I don't want my feeds filled with their ugly artwork. Ive already seen that style anyways."

You don't even know why you don't like it, you're just doing what you've been told to do. Jfc.

The comment right before and after this exchange makes it clear he is specifically talking about IDF troops. Because of how Israel's military is structured, this means a good portion of the state is included.

You are spouting a known zionist talking point: "The IDF = every single Jew on the planet."

I personally wouldn't include reservists in the count, since they would need to be called for active duty and accept to be in the genocidal camp imo. That being said, jumping straight to antisemitism isn't valid.