Skip Navigation
Posts
68
Comments
772
Joined
2 yr. ago
  • At the same time, the emigration of intelligent people is piling up.

  • That's true, but he will still need new buyers because his previous allies, whom he has alienated greatly, will very likely reduce their order volume considerably.

    I think that this so-called statesman, with his petty power games, has once again overestimated himself on this issue - as with others issues but in the same stupid manner.

  • That doesn't seem unlikely to me, since Trump has destroyed the basis of trust with his allies and is thus doing considerable damage to one of the few US industries that is still functioning well, namely the arms industry.

    Perhaps he somehow thought that Europe would buy the weapons needed to equip itself because he has unilaterally terminated NATO protection from US companies. Maybe a few that you can't get anywhere else, but the EU would be incredibly stupid to buy from a nation that is now hostile to it.

    So other buyers will probably have to be found - although Russia has its own arms industry and is also on good terms with China. Moreover, unlike Trump, Putin really isn't an idiot.

    But hey, maybe the EU can negotiate a billion-euro arms deal with Russia to get better conditions for Ukraine.

    It would hardly be any different from buying weapons from the US.

  • Never mind. Russia is calling the shots on their side anyway.

  • I wonder what it was used for

  • Oh, absolutely. I am totally convinced that Trump's main goal is to line his own pockets and those of his criminal friends.

    I was merely trying to reflect what Trump's official plan is - especially in light of the fact that the US economy actually does have some problems. These include among other things steadily rising interest payments to creditors and the strong dollar, which has very obviously been at odds with weakening industrial production for quite some time.

    However, the Mar-a-Lago Accord (not an accord yet by the way but merely a strategy paper) was drawn up by his main economist, Miran. This guy is apparently convinced that the problems that the US economy has could be solved in this way.

    But still: even if Trump wasn't a criminal who is only interested in his own advantage, I still don't think his economist's plan could work. Even without Trump, this would be pretty absurd. But with Trump I think it is impossible, because this moron even makes it worse - for example by not introducing the tariffs gradually as planned, but immediately at the maximum percentage (prolly to make more on insider trading). This is disastrous even in the context of this already crazy plan.

    So in short, Trump's economists want to fundamentally reshape the global economy (by pure force) with a pretty absurd plan - but Trump's greed and stupidity makes it even less likely that this could ever work.

    Oh, and: In any case, all of this is very much at the expense of US citizens - except for the usual 1 percent, of course.

    Edit: Probably a misunderstanding: I didn't mean that you were wrong about Trump jeopardizing the long-term prosperity of the US economy - I completely agree with you. I just wanted to say that the US economy was indeed already fragile before him, but that's not because of Biden, but because of a long-term development that led there.

  • I think you're wrong: the problem in the US is that the dollar is far too strong in relation to industrial output. The reason for this is that it is bought by other nations as a reserve currency through US government bonds.

    This is a major problem for the US industry, which is nowhere near as strong as the strength of the currency would suggest. The problem is that a disproportionately strong dollar makes US products so expensive on the global market that they are barely competitive.

    Trump's plan (described in the so-called "Mar-a-Lago Accord") now envisages forcing the partner states in particular, all of which are creditors of the USA, to suspend their claims (basically as if it were a national bankruptcy).

    The only two explanations for this behavior I can come up with are: Either the US is actually bankrupt and Trump is trying to forestall the inevitable, or he is trying to impose an economic system on the world that favors the US even more than it already does, in an excess of hubris.

    Either way: I believe that neither of the "solutions" for these two scenarios are realistically feasible with this plan. And I also don't think that the Fed will go along with this, without which Trump cannot implement this plan - but he can't force the Fed to play along either because he has no direct control over this institution as it is independent of the state administration.

  • Trump Has Exposed Exploited the Fragility of the Global Dollar System

  • Was it not this so-called Supreme Court that has already granted the president more rights than a king? How is that supposed to be constitutional in a democratic country?

    It seems to me that the constitutional crisis has long since occurred.

    I don't really understand why anyone should appeal to the corrupt judges who are responsible for this. It's a waste of time, because the outcome of all such attempts is already known in advance.

    Or is the plan to buy Thomas & Co. another nice house - or maybe a new boat, or yet another luxurious vacation?

  • Yes, he is definitely a psychopath.

    What makes it all the worse, unfortunately, is the fact that turbo-capitalism is all about these character trades: limitless greed and selfishness are the name of the game here, rather than empathy and kindness.

    That's why there are so many obvious psychopaths in high positions. If it's all about profits without consideration for anything else, these people are the perfect match.

  • Yes, he probably just couldn't cope with all this hypocrisy.

  • Do you have a very good print regional newspaper or are you saying that these protests are not worth real-time coverage?

  • Do you think reddit is immune to the oligarchs? I don't think so at all.

    Edit: What I'm saying is: post here rather than on reddit. There are no current updates in the Lemmy community. And I'm assuming that the discussion is taking place on reddit because everyone is somehow still there. Why is that? Why is everyone still there when it's clear as day that reddit is so rotten that Aaron Swartz would roll over in his grave if he had to witness that.

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    Where can I get news about today's 50501 protests? There seems to be frighteningly little news about this in the mainstream media.

    politics @lemmy.world
    DandomRude @lemmy.world
    Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    When was the last time you felt that you were well represented by a politician - be it at local or national level? What was the occasion?

    Asklemmy @lemmy.ml
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    Are people in the US aware that they are now definitely a rogue state, or is this fact covered up by the usual patriotism somehow?

    Books @lemmy.ml
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    Sadly very topical again: Hannah Arendt's "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil"

    "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil" examines the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi bureaucrat instrumental in organizing the Holocaust. Eichmann was captured by Israeli agents in Argentina in 1960 and tried in Jerusalem for crimes against humanity. Hannah Arendt controversially described Eichmann as "terrifyingly normal," emphasizing his thoughtlessness and blind obedience to orders rather than inherent sadism or hatred. He executed his role as a logistical organizer of mass deportations and killings with bureaucratic efficiency, seeing himself as a law-abiding citizen fulfilling his duties.

    Arendt coined the term "banality of evil" to highlight how ordinary individuals, through moral disengagement and adherence to authority, can commit horrific acts. She criticized the trial for its theatrical nature and questioned I

    Books @lemmy.world
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    Sadly very topical again: Hannah Arendt's "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil"

    "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil" examines the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi bureaucrat instrumental in organizing the Holocaust. Eichmann was captured by Israeli agents in Argentina in 1960 and tried in Jerusalem for crimes against humanity. Hannah Arendt controversially described Eichmann as "terrifyingly normal," emphasizing his thoughtlessness and blind obedience to orders rather than inherent sadism or hatred. He executed his role as a logistical organizer of mass deportations and killings with bureaucratic efficiency, seeing himself as a law-abiding citizen fulfilling his duties.

    Arendt coined the term "banality of evil" to highlight how ordinary individuals, through moral disengagement and adherence to authority, can commit horrific acts. She criticized the trial for its theatrical nature and questioned I

    Memes @lemmy.ml
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    Peak Relaxation, please

    Books @lemmy.ml
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    Probably more relevant than ever before: Harry G. Frankfurt's "On Bullshit"

    Harry Frankfurt's "On Bullshit" is a philosophical exploration of the nature and societal impact of "bullshit." Frankfurt defines bullshit as speech or communication that is indifferent to the truth, distinguishing it from lying. While liars deliberately distort the truth, bullshitters disregard it entirely, focusing instead on personal goals or persuasion without concern for accuracy.

    Frankfurt argues that this indifference to truth makes bullshit more dangerous than lies because it undermines the value of truth itself. He attributes the rise of bullshit to societal pressures to express opinions on topics regardless of expertise, often prioritizing appearance over substance. This growing disregard for truth, he warns, poses a significant threat to society's ability to discern reality.

    Asklemmy @lemmy.ml
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    What would it mean for the world if the US were to transform itself from the usual democracy-like plutocracy into an outright dictatorship? Would anything change at all?

    Asklemmy @lemmy.ml
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    In your experience, what is Halloween all about?

    Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    What were you wrong about for a long time? How did you realize you were wrong?

    Asklemmy @lemmy.ml
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    How many followers, subscribers, connections, upvotes or friends (...) does it take to turn a normal person into an influencer on a particular social media platform? Does it take anything else?

    Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    In your opinion, what characterizes a good CEO of a medium-sized company?

    Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    Do you like smart asses?

    196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    Pondering Orbs in Super(ule) Castlevania IV

    Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    What's the most annoying thing?

    Programmer Humor @lemmy.ml
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    Overflow

    HipHopHeads @sopuli.xyz
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    The Firm - Affirmative Action

    HipHopHeads @sopuli.xyz
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    Cocoa Brovaz (Smif-N-Wessun) - Super Brooklyn

    Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world
    DandomRude @lemmy.world

    What's the strangest job title you've ever heard?

    For me, a random sales guy took the cake when he introduced himself as "Chief Innovation Evangelist".