I was definitely talking about the first scenario, as is mostly everyone else. I know not everyone admits gravity (gravitational attraction) might travel faster than light as in the "sun moving" thought experiment. I'm not confused, I'm discussing like everybody else. You linked an article about gravitational waves which must transmit through some sort of gravitational field and they might transmit at approximately c as predicted in general relativity. What I believe is that gravitational attraction, so the general effect of the field will be felt as if it acts almost instantly, and that does not contradict anything about the waves in that field. Because the waves in that field are not responsible for the attraction. This is similar to how photons do not mediate the magnetic attraction in magnets even though they are electromagnetic waves. The current theories (which you are pulling from) manage to mathematically explain that in our moving sun thought experiment, the gravitational force coming from the sun appears to "update" instantly as if it's acting from it's actual position without the lag, because of (to my understanding) the curvature of space-time. So I personally can't fight that on mathematical grounds because that's above my understanding. But in the end it doesn't change much of anything to our discussion, because the force of gravity still updates "as if" it was mostly instantaneous and that's the standard model. Meanwhile, gravitational waves do travel at c but are kind of unrelated to the continous force. They are merely fluctuations in that force. Please keep poking and challenging me at that, I'm still wrapping my head around it and will need better and better sources while I'm hyper focusing on it until I move on lol

I don't think gravitational waves traveling at the speed of light is the same as the gravitational attraction being apparently felt faster than light travels. Similarly, electric attraction between + and - charges is different from electromagnetic waves being transmitted in the field. It's not light that is "communicating" that attraction.

I used wave function as a bad form of shorthand for the general properties of the photon, such as the theoretically infinitely extending magnetic and electric fields. Those associated fields stop existing when the photon is absorbed onto a screen. They collapse faster than light can travel. This doesn't ruin much of modern theories, because there doesn't seem to be a way to transfer usable information through this phenomenon.

No, gravity is faster than light. If there was this lag, we wouldn't have stable orbits exactly because of the lag you describe. Wave functions of photons also collapse faster than light when they hit absorbent material.

Im not reading on that specifically right now, but I think one problem with dark matter is that it's not a falsifyable hypothesis and likely never will be. I can make up an explanation over any body of proof of a phenomena and just say that my explanation is due to undetectable things. An alternative theory would be something like stars spinning produce electromagnetic fields which account for the apparent acceleration that's attributed to gravity caused by an invisible mass. You can measure electromagnetic fields and you can refine models of our sun to try and prove it, and then reach for further discovery. Dark matter feels like a well that's that. Can't see it, can't touch it, can't prove it doesn't exist. It should be what remains after we've actually tried explanations based on observed phenomenas. That's just my barely informed take on it.

Yeah it probably becomes WiFi Direct once both find the other. In my experience though the quality is pretty bad, might depend on the devices

Using screen mirroring or does it still access the home network?

What is this?

Try looking for open matte also. Some open matte versions will have recording equipment visible in some scenes though which might take you out of the movie if you've never seen it before https://blog.sporv.com/open-matte-master-list/

They also have the extra lobe iirc

Cant access the article, here's a dumb AI summary "The article by David Fickling on Bloomberg Law discusses China's electric vehicle (EV) subsidy system. Fickling argues that China can't reduce its EV subsidies because it isn't actually paying them in full. While the Chinese government provides financial incentives to encourage the growth of the EV industry, much of the support is being delayed or deferred, and in some cases, the payments are not made at all. The article highlights the gap between China's ambitious EV targets and the practical realities of its financial commitments, pointing out that many EV companies rely on the promise of subsidies, even though the actual funds have often not been disbursed as expected. This reliance on delayed payments could undermine the sustainability of the industry and the broader transition to electric vehicles."

House flies start producing potent methamphetamine in their wings, which means the whole world has uncontrollable access to it.

Does this work?

This proof is partial though. This assumes there is only 1 way of obtaining lead. What if lead appeared from fusion in stars younger than that.

C'est pour discuter honnêtement ou juste pour répéter qu'on lit la situation de façon opposé? J'ai pas trop envie, je voulais juste dire qu'on semble pas voir la même réalité. Les gens sont rapides à ignorer la vision de l'autre.

The whole mental health angle is reaching a bit far, but if anyone actually invokes it, I wouldn't fight back. Like sure, you don't want comment clashes, I can understand, I won't trigger them.

I just have a problem with considering the whole hexbear instance as toxic and ideologically dubious. I get why someone might feel like that, but seeing 5 top level comments repeating it when I just don't believe it's true, I felt like adding my grain of salt.

We sit at the same table to try and bring the left together. I don't care about helping Hexbear, I just wanna interest random users to challenge their views like I do. I have to work at standing up to others, true, but I haven't encountered slurs, calls to violence or troll behavior from Hexbear, at least none that haven't been resolved properly (though I'm sure it can happen).

Sometimes you express a view that's untrue or that lacks empathy and get called out for it. It feels insulting when it happens, but I doesn't have to be.

I'm not "my colleagues" and I don't speak for them. If replying a simple "lol" to something of substance feels wrong, you could avoid doing it. My experience there makes me believe the lol user must have responded to something useless or disconnected from reality.

Isn't the studied time frame extremely small?

I think the content on hexbear is interesting and it's bad to alienate new users of what they might find there. I reread the old post and the issues are being conflated in the comments here, I just don't see what is being described here. Sure the bickering gets harsh deep in the comments, but that's just the internet. People explain themselves sufficently well. That's it.

Pretty sure it's Adam Driver