Other than the first one none of those are communist. As for left there is nothing more left than communist, it can be argued, and I would be one that unless you are willing to give the workers the means of production, you cannot be left.

For the record I was not saying they where but that is very clearly what the person you origionaly replied to was refering too... because Westerners

talking about Kulloks

Intersting, I do not remember any means of production being turned over to the workers? I dont remember a law passed to remove the scehdual F capabilities, I do not remember stuffing the supreme court in retaliation for Roe being overturned. Heck I do not even remember stufing the Postal board of governors so full that it would fire DeJoy and ensure a reasonable PMG for over a decade... Please enlighten me, what left wing actions must I look at

And what pry tell did your protests accomplish, Protests are easy for the ruling class to ignore if they so chose. Did your protest make it uncomfortable for them to exist, did you disrupt trafic, cram the government building past building code forcing some of them to be unable to get to their office, block cars from leaving the parking lot?

so my media literacy is that the US government is so wholesome they would never do that? or that Government employees are smart enough to not use there .gov email for this?

I am failing to see how some or even just 1 mod having a .gov is so below the level of belivablity that it must be disreguarded prematurely. I am in this comment in no way saying they where present, but also that it seems silly to just assume that this is "obviously not a think that could happen" Like the articles that will spring up that someone broke the speed of light

between 2 and 3 there is a step that goes from "nearly half" to "roughly half" and that is what makes that jump easier you would also likely see that between 3 and 4.

however 2-4 are not needed because 45% is by most metrics a "significant amount"

Only answer that would make me happy

Plurality, as you pointed out he did not get a majoirty

I belive the offical wording is "wierd hand motion" and "heart going out to the crowd" because clearly none of us have eyes

As someone who is stauncly pro dog ... and weary of cats... I feel like I need to take a side in this debate

... and also Yougoslavia, hence where the name came from

I mean it is not one issue, I have multiple issues, I had one issue that was the straw that broke the cammels back. I needed enough cleared up, or my none starter cleared up first.

Second if we have the same values, why did you compromise on them, and how are you able to sleep with them so compromised.

Third we had more than 2 choices, I would not say of the multiple people running Harris was the best, HECK Harris was not the best potential Dem nominee, she flat out ended her be neighborly and the GOP is wierd because her C-Suite brother in law asked her to stop. She had a good start, and she chose the right VP but threw it away to appease the rich.

agian they are deffinitionaly not, witholding support, and activly giving it to someone else are not the same

Genuine question, why should I keep agreeing to a compromise that every time I look back has run farther and farther to the right and away from what my values are. You can say protest and advocate for change but when that happened they where shamed arrested and expelled. The railway union was forced into an unfavorable contract by the democrats. At what point is it that this compromise is less a compromise and more a pacification, and me lending my support to another right wing extention? Where is the red line? are individuals not allowed to have positions where if you support them they will not suport you? or even if you get enough of them?

lets not confuse not voting for, and voting aganst

I mean I never used the term "Genocide Joe" it seemed a little silly, but I was and am a person who said that in good contious I could not suport Biden, or Harris who said the only difrence we would see is a republican in her cabinet. No where in here am I saying this is anything less than the same level of genocide... nor am I saying that this is not more blatent, but the reality is that it is not significantly worse than the previous, that was just constantly being bombed, and that was being enabled by Biden

Maybe just maybe they stopped complaining because there reason to complain is no longer there, and they are complaining with you that Trump is aiding in a genocide.

I mean what do you propose, I mean I personaly do not want to regress farther to fudalism

I am sorry to hear your vocabulary has such lack of nuance, it must make having proper indepth conversations hard for you.

I am not saying it is not making a choice, it is making a choice, and with all choices it has consiquinces, what I am saying is that it is, by deffinition not the same choice as SUPPORTING trump. you can say the choice caused trump, you can say it enabled him, but deffinitionaly it is not the same as supporting him, as support is an afermitive thing, and the choices of not voting, voting 3rd party, and voting democrat all are not chosing to suport him