Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BL
Posts
0
Comments
39
Joined
2 yr. ago
  • I'm not sure what parent is after exactly.

    Body in frame is an older way of making cars but it's far easier/cheaper to make thos heavy duty and modular (e.g. an f250 can be a pickup, tow truck, ambulance, dump truck...)

    Unibody is more modern.

    Most people can live with a unibody truck (Maverick,Ridgeline,Colorado).

    I don't thing there's causation between unibody and body on frame as far as fuel consumption is concerned.

    We'd need a mechanism that incentives smaller vehicles without impacting the services relying on the heavy duty vehicles...

    A Maverick starting at like $24k and an f150 at $35k isn't enough...