I'm hearing rumors on reddit that khanenei got killed. Unverified for now, but knowing israel's MO, it wouldn't surprise me one bit that they will use decapitation strikes.
My question is, if khamenei were to die, would it be easier for Iran to finally develop nukes?
As we've seen over and over again, the only thing that can ensure a country's sovereignty is having nuclear weapons, and Iran willingly ignoring that has been their number 1 mistake since the fucking beginning.
With such an anti-nuclear leader as the ayatollah gone, will Iran finally be able to take off their kiddy gloves and do what's needed to safeguard themselves from the Axis of Epstein?
I'm just a layman, I'm afraid. I've been expanding my understanding of literature and I frequently come across various references to philosophy, so I've taken some detours over the years and read baudrillard, nietzsche, plato, some marx, zichec or however you spell his name, fanon, etc. Almost every one of them refer to Hegel, so I thought I'd check him out.
As for my current understanding of dialectics. Iirc, everything is connected in an infininite Web of ever changing contradictions that negate or solve each other, giving rise to new contradictions to be solved and so on.
Probably wrong, but I'd like to get a better understanding.
It's almost as if rhetoric, debates, exposures, truth-telling and media consumption are just empty liberal rituals that can only serve to soothe oneself, and has absolutely no impact on real material life.
Before the internet, these people would be locked up in the attic and sneer at schoolchildren from the windows.
The internet has given voices to people who had very good reasons to be shunned.
Maybe one day, someone will blow up the ocean internet cables and we'll all be free and normal again.