Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BG
Posts
2
Comments
355
Joined
2 yr. ago
  • If you're going to try ackshually-ing, you could at least be right. Even if you presuppose that "weight is force" (which, frankly, is one of those distinctions that people love to parade around to make themselves sound smart, but generally ignores historical, lingual, and legal contexts), objects in LEO are still attracted to earth with about 90% of the force they would be on earth's surface.

    Unless you're one of those loons who only call the reaction force of a static system weight, in which case may God have mercy on your soul.

  • Permanently Deleted

  • Based on the CSMS statement elseware in the thread and my limited google-fu, it looks like swicth one was 9504.50, which isn't on the list of exemptions.

    That said, I wouldn't be too surprised if Nintendo figured out a few tweaks in the feature list that would allow them to claim it as one of the exempted categories.

  • It's not quite that quantitative:

    Participants were asked, “Can you chew hard food such as hard bread or apples?” with three possible response options: (1) “Yes, without difficulty”, indicating no issues with chewing hard food; (2) “Yes, but I must be careful”, reflecting some difficulty or the need to adjust chewing habits, such as taking smaller bites or chewing more slowly to avoid discomfort; and (3) “No, not at all”, indicating a complete inability to chew hard food

  • Fixable

  • Rather than directly pissing on your post, I just have two questions (that I don't necessarily expect you to reply to):

    Would you be okay with people who can't pay you back benefiting if it cost you less overall?

    How does this compare to other systems you do consider the government competent enough to manage?

  • I had the goofiest setup years ago... It was a single 16:9 1080p in the middle, with two 4:3 (1024x768?) monitors rotated. The sizes were just right so the pixel density was the same, and the sides only had a little bit of overscan when joined to imitate an ultrawide.___

  • No Stupid Questions @lemmy.world
    Bgugi @lemmy.world

    Is thinly-veiled political whinging really a question just because you used a question mark?

    Atheism @lemmy.world
    Bgugi @lemmy.world

    They were so close...

    Railroad museum goes off rails letting satanic temple display at tree festival Letters to the Editor Milwaukee Journal Sentinel