ooooh indeed. hypothesis confirmed.

now time to unleash the FURY of AA TUBE upon a DEFENSELESS community with its PLUNDER TROVE that is TWO THREADS! /j

Yes, promotion and awareness of a service is necessary for its continuation. I've agreed with that. But again, without the technological resources and money, there is no service to promote and nothing to continue because it hadn't even started.

Interesting you see that. For me (logged in on my db0 alt) on Tesseract there is a moderator column but it's empty even for local actions and Photon doesn't even give me a moderator section.

Don't Lemmy modlogs only tell you who received the action (i.e. who was banned), even on Tesseract?

I think we might want to do a governance post at that point.

Anarchy isn't "no punishment", it's "no indubitable (the 'correct' spelling of undoubtable) power, especially not hierarchical ones". Having a benevolent dictator or oligarchy is indeed hierarchical but to their credit they're working towards implementing some sort of admin rotation system last I heard.

That would be PTB from the admin, especially for an instance-wide ban.

Oh yeah, I forgot about that Lemmy modlog quirk. I really wonder why that's not open to users if the purpose is transparency. Mbin's modlog tells you who initiated the action, though the "tradeoff" quirk is you can't see the reason provided, plus I would probably have to leaf through pages 12–18 to find that action. A post at governance will probably have the admins of db0 find out who did it and investigate.

That's not contradictory. Most would rather offload hardware and security costs, running one's own hardware is time intensive nevermind power and equipment costs, and you can indeed add advertising and awareness costs to that list. But you do also need the resource investments for a service to start with before advertising it.

indeed we’ll have to rely on your memory. do you remember how many times you reported this admin (even across separate comments count) and whether you have reported others multiple times in the same sitting? i would ping the admin somewhere (here or in a thread you might start in /0 governance)

I think they mean they’re transparently objecting and from their own concern. JAQ is a way to avoid accountability and appearances of a position and can be from any kind of faith: good or bad.

extra 4% tariff on aliased packages

how so lol

The plain and active meaning of ["facilitate"] cannot be diluted by its constriction, as the government would have it, to a narrow term of art. We are not bound in this context by a definition crafted by an administrative agency and contained in a mere policy directive. Cf. Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369, 400 (2024); Christensen v. Harris Cnty. , 529 U.S. 576, 587 (2000).

i knew skidmore was better than chevron!

That young brains are still highly actively developing, perhaps? Like why minors shouldn’t drink coffee or weed?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_indicator

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triboelectric_effect#Liquids_and_gases

Since triboelectricity requires asperities, I would guess the interiors of such containers are smoothed out. It’s also not unheard of for fuel containers to spontaneously explode when they fall, and movies that often happens when they smash against the ground.

chinese (epiphany) german (language class) english (epiphany) french (hamilton) japanese (karate) spanish (language class) in no particular order (provenance)

That's just wrong. If it's a joke please mark it as such because there's nothing to indicate it's a joke.

Support was provided by the National Institutes of Health (R01AG082783; M.K.S., J.F.B.), the National Science Foundation (1920730 and 1943323; M.K.S.) and the Alzheimer’s Association (AARG-22-924771; J.F.B.). The funders had no role in study design,
data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of
the paper.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Plus it's a meta-analysis review.