Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)NF
Posts
0
Comments
68
Joined
2 yr. ago
  • I absolutely fuckin hate this. It's almost the equivalent of YouTube removing the dislike button.

    I am leaving this account behind because of this change, which is incredibly frustrating to have to do, since I had many saved posts and I already had been blocking the communities I don't like to see rather than downvoting their posts, so I have to redo all of this on a new instance.

    Downvotes are an integral part of a voting system, and are especially critical in low population environments like this. I don't care how many "likes" a post has, what matters is the up/down ratio. Now lemmynsfw has lost that.

  • Linux kernel doesn't include a spell checking dictionary soooooo Linux doesn't worry about whether things are words. Your particular spellchecker doesn't seem to think linux is a word but "aspells dict on my machine doesn't consider linux a word" sounds a lot dumber (because it is pretty dumb)

  • Absolutely agreed. The equivalent of "Can't have application shortcuts, you can already find the executables in the file browser* type nonsense IMHO

    I would much rather have it in two places where a user would expect it than 1 place a user wouldn't...

  • It sends a message to the 2nd party that they're not doing enough for my vote. If they want my vote, they'll have to change their policies to be more like the party I voted for.

    If the losing party loses by 10,000 votes, and 10,000 people voted third party, guess what, the strategists are going to try to find a way to capture those votes.

    Without those 10,000 votes for 3rd party, the 2nd party either does nothing or tries to get votes from the other side, moving their policies further toward the 1st party.

    I would say in the current political climate, 3rd party voting is more important than ever. The idea that it's a vote for the other side is an absolute farce, an attempt at preventing change, and couldn't be further from the truth.

  • Forcing someone to use a different form of media to get acceptable support for your product is pretty bullshit. If I can sign up for, pay for, and use your product for years without a telephone, I shouldn't suddenly be forced to use a phone to get support.

    Even if that might be the best solution at this point, it's still garbage and something to justifiably complain about, especially considering it's mildly infuriating we're talking about.

  • Doesn't make "per a source" any less stupid of a phrase. Every thing is per a source. It only matters if the source is reliable. If you think any source of Paul's is a reliable one, why bother stating "per a source"?

  • Exactly this myself. Debian lxc with jellyfin repo added, media on ZFS with passthrough mountpoints, very performant and easy to maintain.

    Docker just adds layers of complexity for no benefit here

  • Jellyfin is also conveniently packaged as a .deb and provide a repo for Ubuntu/Debian. It's pretty easy to spin up a Debian container, add the repo, and apt install jellyfin, IMHO easier than doing the same thing with a VM, then docker...

  • There's a huge part of it that is because there's no communication mechanism to resolve conflict on the road, really.

    If you're stuck behind someone going slower than you want to, how can you clearly communicate that?

    Even in a world where you could clearly speak to them, there's huge potential for disagreement there, and since the only communication mechanisms can very easily be construed as needlessly dangerous or aggressive, of course you're gonna see frustration and anger as a result