Marriage, often romanticized as a sacred union, can be viewed through a critical lens as a construct of the societal matrix that entraps individuals in a cycle of responsibility and obligation. This institution creates an illusion of maturity and stability, leading individuals to believe that they are fulfilling their roles as responsible members of society. However, this perceived responsibility often translates into a relentless pursuit of productivity, where individuals labor tirelessly to support a system that benefits the few at the expense of the many. In this sense, marriage can be seen as a mechanism that perpetuates a cycle of servitude, binding individuals to a life of work and sacrifice.
The family unit, often seen as a source of love and support, can also serve as a breeding ground for conformity to societal expectations. Within this framework, individuals are encouraged to procreate, further entrenching the cycle of servitude. Children, from a young age, are indoctrinated
Society has a persistent tendency to isolate intelligent individuals. This isolation often arises because these individuals are seen as distractions. The system, whether it be educational, political, or social, generally does not welcome those who question its authority or actions. When intelligent people do question the system, they are frequently labeled as troublemakers, further marginalizing them from mainstream society.
From the perspective of many, intelligent individuals are often viewed as misfits who do not conform to societal norms or cultural expectations. These individuals can make others uncomfortable by exposing truths that many prefer to ignore. Intelligent people tend to question and research rather than accept information blindly, a trait that often puts them at odds with those who are content with the status quo and do not seek reality. Most people are more interested in material gains and the superficial aspects of life, often referred to as the "bullshit" provided
Social media has become a pervasive tool in modern society, often transforming the mundane into the meaningful. It allows individuals to curate their lives, presenting a polished version of reality that can be far removed from the truth. This digital façade can create a sense of connection and purpose, yet it often masks the underlying struggles and discontent that many face. People find themselves scrolling through feeds filled with carefully crafted images and stories, leading them to believe that happiness and fulfillment are just a post away. In this way, social media can serve as a distraction, diverting attention from the harsher realities of life and the existential questions that linger beneath the surface.
In this context, many individuals find themselves trapped in a cycle of work and consumption, laboring for companies and organizations that prioritize profit over people. The relentless pursuit of money becomes a means of survival, yet it often leads to a sense of emptiness
In many cultures, individuals are often compelled to show respect to authority figures such as teachers, elders, and parents, even when that respect may not be warranted. This expectation can significantly restrict personal freedom, particularly when it comes to expressing opinions or preferences in various settings, including family gatherings, schools, and public auditions. For example, when a student argues that certain subjects are irrelevant to their daily lives, they may be ridiculed instead of engaged. This reaction can instill a belief that speaking the truth will lead to social isolation, shaping their future interactions and inhibiting their willingness to dissent.
This suppression of honest expression extends beyond educational environments to families and religious communities. In many families, children who question traditional practices or beliefs may be dismissed or scolded, reinforcing the idea that challenging
Religions are constructs created by humans, often serving as frameworks through which individuals seek understanding and meaning in their lives. However, many argue that these belief systems provide a false sense of comfort or hope, distracting people from confronting the harsh realities of existence. In this view, the allure of religion can prevent individuals from recognizing that, in the grand scheme, nothing truly matters. This detachment from reality can lead to a refusal to break free from societal norms, often referred to as "the matrix."
In this context, it is suggested that those who struggle with these concepts—particularly the more intelligent individuals—may find themselves isolated or ignored. They grapple with the complexities of religious beliefs and often feel disconnected from the mainstream narratives that others accept without question. This isolation can be profound, as these individuals seek to connect the
"The time has now come to bring these chapters to a close. My life from this point onward has been so public that there is hardly anything about it that people do not know. Moreover, since 1921 I have worked in such close association with the Congress leaders that I can hardly describe any episode in my life since then without referring to my relations with them. For though Shraddhanandji, the Deshabandhu, Hakim Saheb and Lalaji are no more with us today, we have the good luck to have a host of other veteran Congress leaders still living and working in our midst. The history of the Congress, since the great changes in it that I have described above, is still in the making. And my principal experiments during the past seven years have all been made through the Congress. A reference to my relations with the leaders would therefore be unavoidable, if I set about describing my experiments further. And this I may not do, at any rate for the present, if only from a sense of propriety. Lastly
Years ago, I encountered a fascinating concept in a book by the Dalai Lama: every seven years, human beings transform into entirely new versions of themselves. This idea stems from the biological principle that our bodies replace virtually all their cells over a seven-year cycle. The person you are ...
Link Actions
I recently spoke with a friend who was still dwelling on something that happened thirty years ago. “Why do you care?” I asked him. “That was four versions of you ago. That person doesn’t exist anymore. Move on.”
I find this way of thinking inspiring. I'm definitely going to share it with friends and loved ones.
When Tolstoy speaks of Christianity, he's referring to his more objective, philosophical, non-supernatural interpretation of his translation of the Gospels: The Gospel In Brief. For context: https://lemmy.world/post/23133528
"They say that the Christian life cannot be established without the use of violence, because there are savage races outside the pale of Christian societies in Africa and in Asia (there are some who even represent the Chinese as a danger to civilization), and that in the midst of Christian societies there are savage, corrupt, and, according to the new theory of heredity, congenital [(of a disease or physical abnormality) present from birth] criminals. And violence, they say, is necessary to keep savages and criminals from
annihilating our civilization. But these savages within and without Christian society, who are such a terror to us, have never been subjugated [bring under domination or control, especially by conquest] by violence, and are not subjugated b
"The intoxication produced by such stimulants as parades, reviews, religious solemnities, and coronations, is, however, an acute and temporary condition; but there are other forms of chronic, permanent intoxication, to which those are liable who have any kind of authority, from that of the Tzar to that of the lowest police officer at the street corner, and also those who are in subjection to authority and in a state of stupefied servility. The latter, like all slaves, always find a justification for their own servility, in ascribing the greatest possible dignity and importance to those they serve. It is principally through this false idea of inequality, and the intoxication of power and of servility resulting from it, that men associated in a state organization are enabled to commit acts opposed to their conscience without the least scruple or remorse.
Under the influence of this intoxication, men imagine themselves no longer simply men as they are, but some special beings—noblem
Over 2,000 years ago, Plato described prisoners in a cave, shackled and forced to watch shadows on a wall, mistaking these illusions for reality. When one prisoner escapes and sees the real world, the truth is overwhelming. But when he returns to free the others, they reject him.
Now, swap the cave for a smartphone. The shadows for social media, curated feeds, and AI-driven content. Are we any different from Plato’s prisoners? We consume reality through screens, shaped by algorithms that decide what we see, think, and believe. Our attention is bought and sold, our perceptions manipulated.
If you were shown the "real world" beyond this digital illusion, free from biases, dopamine loops, and controlled narratives. Would you even believe it? Or would you, like Plato’s prisoners, reject the truth in favor of comforting shadows?
That should be the biggest argument against the rise of tech bro neo feudalism. Feudalism only has a hierarchy of lesser and greater lords that hold a right to ownership of any kind and have a licence to exploit the peasantry, and everyone else is a serf of no relevance or rights of autonomy or ownership.
The only way feudalism can possibly play out is empoverishment of the masses in the long term.