Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)W
Posts
6
Comments
223
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Why shouldn't they count? It's literally testing a nuclear weapon. The clock does not say: "Time since the last detonation of a nuclear weapon".

    Edit: But one could argue that nuclear weapons get tested all the time without any kind of detonation. These should count too IMHO.

    Edit: just read another article on the tests. They happen to design new weapons with them which makes them not tests to see if the nukes still work like I thought.

  • Yep optix works on Linux. Blender is also generally faster in Linux btw.

  • Warum so verschachtelt? Weil es offensichtlich Aufmerksamkeit generiert. Es hat also funktioniert.

  • What we need is a way to host a community on multiple instances. The fragmentation is really inconvenient and that is a huge push factor

  • Als ich noch in der Schule war, waren sogar manche staatlichen Webseiten vom Jugendschutzfiltern geblockt.

  • That picture is hanging in one of my philosophy professors office. She used this image as an introduction to epistemology.

    It is obvious to us that there is a mountain there but how are we coming to that conclusion exactly. I.e. What kind of logical assumptions and inferences are we making.

    And how can we priorities sources of knowledge. For example what if the instruments of the plane claim there was no mountain.

  • I do not know about this specific case nor am I in a position to decide what should or shouldn't be happening about that person.

    One thing you wrote really sounded my alarm bells. "(the words of the police)". This is dangerous. The police should not do the judicial side of things! Neither explicitly nor implicitly. Police is biased by design against suspects.

    And that is even if you disregard the numerous bad actors that police structures attract.

  • Legally yes it would be easy. Practically we do not have the infrastructure anymore for it.

    Heck iirc the state doesn't even have the capability to know who would need to be drafted anymore.

  • Ui ich kann gerade auf das Vorderende zugreifen. Zwar ohne Bilder, aber es geht.

  • Ohne die in irgendeiner Weise legitimieren zu wollen, aber es ist durchaus einleuchtend, dass Nationalisten für Umweltschutz sind. Im Sinne von Umweltschutz ist Heimatschutz.

  • Because people that don't care about privacy find this to be a nice feature.

    There are gallery apps that let's you sort by location and it's nice if you want to search for the cool thing you saw once again.

  • hawt

    Jump
  • Nothing at all...

  • You can go on adventures at any age as long as you are physically able enough!

    And even then the physical requirements are not as harsh as one might think.

  • My use of language could very well be incorrect. I am not a native English speaker anyways. That's no reason to be so condescending.

    I was just merely stating my credentials to have a basis of discussion but you do not seem to be interested in that.

  • I know. I've studied this extensively. I am specialized in formal logic and by extension set theory. I've worked with and help write actual research papers in this field where this is basic knowledge.

    I've never claimed there to be a bijection between the reals and the natural numbers. Please point out what statement I made that is wrong. I would very much like to know.

    Also no you do not have to accept choice for this to be true. ZF is perfectly acceptable to study various infinite sets with differing cardinality.

    Edit: This is what I mean when I say that our intuition is broken. One set can be larger than the other but both be non-ending that is infinite.

    Beeing larger does not mean it is more infinite!

  • That is until you meet analysis people that define a symbol for infinity (and it's negation) and add it to the real numbers to close the set.

    Also there are applications in computer science where ordering stuff after the first infinite ordinal is important and useful.

    Yea unfortunately we do kinda calculate with infinity as a concrete thing sometimes in higher level maths...

  • That is the way it is often taught but actually both sets are infinite that is have no ends or in other words are not bounded.

    The thing that is confusing to understand is that the question how many there are and how much there is diverges at infinity.

    Our intuition (as finite beings) is broken here. Both sets are infinite but in one is more than in the other. That does not make one set more infinite than the other. You cannot be more unending than to literally have no end.

  • Infinity + infinity = 2 * infinity... 3 * infinity ... Infinity * infinity = infinity2 ... Infinity3 ... Infinity^infinity ...

    If infinity is the "first" i.e. Natural infinity than those are all well defined things (Ordinals)

  • It is and it's a nice picture does remind me of the time I was in Finland.