Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T

tatoko556

@ tatoko556 @reddthat.com

帖子
17
评论
135
加入于
3 mo. ago

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • Among the meaningless comments made by people who are incapable of rational thinking, these few are actually meaningful and reasonable.

    From @Ildsaye@hexbear.net

    Surveillance gives terrorists like the US and its Zionist appendage a huge advantage, and the working class should not be surrendering its data to them without a fight.

    From @artyom@piefed.social

    https://gizmodo.com/reddit-meta-and-google-voluntarily-gave-dhs-info-of-anti-ice-users-report-says-2000722279

    However those comments can only prove Surveillance are unacceptable in America and Zionist related countries, Can anyone provide a counterpoint for other countries like Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea...

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • Public surveillance from government is what we are discussing, please do not mix it up with voyeurism

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • Why is that? Surveillance can still be helpful if all people are targeted.

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • Good for you, but I cannot afford to replicate your approach. Thank you for the responses

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • More surveillance = more crime detected, do I need to prove 1+1=2 for you as well?

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • FYI voice mail are surveilled

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • Your are lucky if your friends and parents don't use facebook, but I'm not so lucky and I'm asking for help

  • Recommendations of Open-source P2P clipboard sync (iOS / Android / Windows)

    跳过

  • thanks!

  • Open-Source P2P Apps

    跳过

  • Thanks, though Reticulum and Arweave can be a bit difficult to use, not sure what exe to download and what platforms are supported

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • If you are having trouble understanding, ask

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • People who use Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram are protected by the law, but they are also bound by the law at the same time. They do not materially benefit from government actions related to terrorism, and it is not in their interests to support them.

    Many people accept surveillance because it does not seem to affect their daily lives, and not fully realize they are being deprived of their privacy.

    Please help provide arguments against - surveillance does not significantly impact daily life and can be beneficial for national security.

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • Edited:

    I agree. However, those who don’t can respond as follows: We do not have to choose between security and privacy, nor should we accept surveillance being used purely for profit. Instead, we can strengthen regulations and legal safeguards to ensure that surveillance is used responsibly and only for legitimate purposes.

    Can you provide an argument for "Even with proper regulations, individuals' emails and messages should not be accessible to governments."

  • Open-Source P2P Apps

    跳过

  • thanks a lot!

  • Open-Source P2P Apps

    跳过

  • any guide on how to start using it?

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • I will respond you with what @Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone said

    As the one making the argument, show me a study that supports that.

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • I agree. However, those who don’t can respond as follows: We do not have to choose between security and privacy, nor should we accept surveillance being used purely for profit. Instead, we can strengthen regulations and legal safeguards to ensure that surveillance is used responsibly and only for legitimate purposes. When properly regulated and transparently managed, surveillance can enhance public safety without infringing on individual rights. Rather than opposing surveillance altogether, we should focus on creating clear laws, strong oversight, and accountability measures to prevent abuse and protect everyone’s interests.

    Can you provide an argument for "Even with proper regulations, individuals' emails and messages should not be accessible to governments."

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • I like your response.

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • Made a new account to badger me?

    If you are looking for logical proof: More surveillance makes it more likely to detect a crime that is being planned, which increases protection.

  • 已被移除

    Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

    跳过

  • With a little patience, people can always find examples where mass surveillance appears to have been put to good use. They might say, “Maybe I am being surveilled, but it doesn’t affect my daily life. However, it could help protect thousands of others.”

    Can you argue against the idea that “Although mass surveillance contributes little to preventing terrorism, even a small contribution is still important”?

    Example of email surveillance being put to good use.

    Najibullah Zazi - Wikipedia

    The Daily Telegraph reported that the plot had been uncovered by Scotland Yard, which intercepted an e-mail from a senior al-Qaeda member in Pakistan to Zazi, instructing him how to implement his attack.

    <sup id="cite_ref-DailyTelegraph2009-11-09_40-0" class="reference">

    <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Najibullah_Zazi#Bombing_plot#cite_note-DailyTelegraph2009-11-09-40">

    <span class="cite-bracket">

    [

    </span>

    40

    <span class="cite-bracket">

    ]

    </span>

    </a>

    </sup>

    The e-mail was intercepted as part of "Operation Pathway".

    <sup id="cite_ref-DailyTelegraph2009-11-09_40-1" class="reference">

    <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Najibullah_Zazi#Bombing_plot#cite_note-DailyTelegraph2009-11-09-40">

    <span class="cite-bracket">

    [

    </span>

    40

    <span class="cite-bracket">

    ]

    </span>

    </a>

    </sup>

    Scotland Yard notified the FBI, which led to the operation that resulted in his arrest.

    <sup id="cite_ref-DailyTelegraph2009-11-09_40-2" class="reference">

    <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Najibullah_Zazi#Bombing_plot#cite_note-DailyTelegraph2009-11-09-40">

    <span class="cite-bracket">

    [

    </span>

    40

    <span class="cite-bracket">

    ]

    </span>

    </a>

    </sup>