Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M

mxeff

@ mxeff @feddit.org

Posts
36
Comments
136
Joined
10 mo. ago

  • ich🎉⛔iel

    Jump

  • Nein, war er eindeutig nicht. Und die mittlerweile (relative) Größe dieser Diskussion, sowie das Abstimmungsverhalten der Zuhausys beweisen das.

    Was fehlt für eine Präzises Evaluation ist weiterer Kontext, den OOP nicht geliefert hat.

  • ich🎉⛔iel

    Jump

  • ich_iel

    Jump

  • Nein, wir können hier nicht wissen ob es der Fall ist, oder nicht. Genau das ist mein Punkt. Uns fehlt Kontext.

    Du konstruiert dir lediglich einen Kontext daher, der deiner Interpretation genehm ist.

    Tschüssi (^_^)/

  • ich_iel

    Jump

  • Auch eine nicht-nette Person kann Recht haben, wenn es der Kontext her gibt. 🤷

  • ich_iel

    Jump

  • Wer die Person ist, ist mir Bewusst. Das genügt aber nicht als Kontext.

  • ich_iel

    Jump

  • Das Problem ist eben, dass es sehr oft Leute gibt, die nicht jur ein bisschen leises "Gedudel im Hintergrund" laufen lassen, sondern die Musik halt auf Partylautstärke aufdrehen. Und da helfen auch Ohrstöpsel und Kopfhörer irgendwann nichts.

  • ich_iel

    Jump

  • Aber Möglich. :P

    Und als seriöse Antwort: Ja, man kann im öffentlichen Raum auch ohne Kopfhörer und mit Lautsprecher Musik abspielen. Aber es gilt dabei stets Rücksicht auf die Mitmenschen zu nehmen und diese nicht unnötig zu belästigen.

    Das Problem an diesem Meme ist vor allem, das OP keinen weiteren Kontext liefert, und eine Person die scheinbar höflich und freundlich um das Ende einer Belästigung bittet, als negativ darstellt.

  • ich_iel

    Jump

  • ich🪨🗓️iel

    Jump

  • If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.

    Jump

  • Sure. ^_^

  • If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.

    Jump

  • I am just curious. So may I ask what your math education is?

  • If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.

    Jump

  • For reference, what is math education?

  • If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.

    Jump

  • This case here.

  • If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.

    Jump

  • In the case I am discussing, the data is generated using the exponential function exp(x).

  • If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.

    Jump

  • I am well aware what a graph is and that it shows the actually values, but to obtain some actually values to perform manually some calculations we need to extract some explicit values from the image. This is however not arbitrarily precise and therefore will add some noise to the extracted values.

    My data is simply y = exp(x).

  • If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.

    Jump

  • Your data, no because I have no access to the actually values. But just a plot of a line that seems very straight (but does not necessarily need to be), and measuring it manually will introduce some noise.

    In my data, that I generated, yes there I know for a fact that it is from an exponential.

  • If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.

    Jump

  • But if the data originates from an exponential, any selection of two points will yield a different slope, because the data point lie not exactly on a straight line.

    You suggested to model it linearly, that is what we are discussing here.

  • If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.

    Jump

  • But this takes only into consideration the two selected point used to calculate the the slope and intercept. All other point will not exactly lie on linear function. And as you can choose any combination of two point you will get again infinitely many different parametrization a of the linear model.

  • If AI was going to advance exponentially I'd have expected it to take off by now.

    Jump

  • But isn't the same true also for a linear model, which of the infinite possible linear functions could fit this curve?