The bots were given the exact same multiple choice questions with the same wording. The difference was the fake biography it had been given for the user prior to the question.
Thanks, I did know about the instance block, but I don't actually want to block all of the communities on the instance - just a few dozen of them. It wasn't even a sizable percentage of the instance, when it existed.
I hope you're feeling better! I'm also a slow-fire for these sorts of topics. I appreciate the effort in your reply, especially with health issues on top - my carefulness was partly due to illness, as is the delay in this one. Bodies surely are fun.
To clarify, I certainly don't condemn you for choosing substack, there are few avenues to choose for long-form writing not backed by significant capital. It's an issue that echoes part of the problem of trust allocation, which I've been considering the last few days. As you point out, it's not exactly as satisfying as actual transformation, which is part of what troubles me. It does make sense though, and if I understand correctly, the steps Tim Berners Lee is taking with the Solid project, or is at least trying to, hold a similar perspective.
From my perspective, we can only have the illusion of trust when the systems are deliberately designed to obscure their mechanisms. And the systems are certainly designed to be black boxes, looking through the Epstein Files financial data is confirmation enough of that. But then again, this has always been true, even if the form has changed over the centuries.
The last few years I've been watching from within how these systems work in the hopes of understanding how real change can occur, and experimenting with pushing change to see where the limits kick in, and how I can help transformation happen more effectively. Part of me hoped to discover something that made it all make sense, but very few of the lessons I've learnt are what I would describe as inspiring or hugely actionable without substantial dependencies. The least cynical summary of what I've learnt is something that is a very obvious proposition on the surface: Changing the results requires changing the goals.
But it doesn't take a whole lot of digging to discover that's just another can of worms.
I also appreciate your explanation of optimism, I had worried that perhaps I had missed some brightly shining silver lining to all of this in my tendency towards abject cynicism. Oriented certainly feels more apt, and possibly even achievable for me, depending on the day.
Thanks again for the considered reply and giving me more to mull over. I think it's time I reassessed my goals.
Or, hear me out, we can acknowledge that the quantity of information and experience necessary to review code properly far exceeds the context windows and architecture of even the most well resourced LLMs available. Especially for big projects.
You can hammer a nail with the blunt end of a screwdriver, but it's neither efficient nor scalable, even before considering the option of choosing the right tool for the job in the first place.
No idea about piefed but the worst part for me about this instance swap is that I have to go visit dozens of different communities and view the banners to block them, because Lemmy doesn't have a dropdown for that like it has for "block user". It applies blur to the posts, but unfortunately not banners, so I either have to block the entire instance or visit each community to block it.
I don't need to see some of the stuff people enjoy to know that it is not for me. Plus the sheer quantity of possible combinations for anal gape creampie yiff hentai is overwhelming, before even considering further granularity by anime franchise or whatever else.
I was considering changing instance anyway so maybe this is just convenient timing.
Question: For the ones involving dicks and balls, do women typically also use these phrases? Is it one of those things that has just become somehow less-gendered over time despite the content?
Someone at work accidentally enabled the copilot PR screening bot for everybody on the whole codebase. It put a bunch of warnings on my PRs about the way I was using a particular framework method. Its suggested fix? To use the method that had been deprecated 2 major versions ago. I was doing it the way that the framework currently deems correct.
A problem with using a bot which uses statistical likelihood to determine correctness is that historical datasets are likely to contain old information in larger quantities than updated information. This is just one problem with having these bots review code, there are many more. I have yet to see a recommendation from one which surpassed the quality of a traditional linter.
An article I would write if I were confident I wouldn't dox myself and lose my ability to eat: "AI as a postmodern Malthusian trap. Tech has forgotten the laws of entropy."
Thanks for letting me know! I'll be sure to add more context if I post one of these again.
For this one, I guess I should have added that Pizza Express was his alibi for how he could not have met the person who accused him of rape. It was a disastrous interview in 2019 that I expect has come back to haunt him. https://archive.md/mPBis
They have to, this was for pre-charge questioning, and they have time limits on custody for that. They've also searched 3 of his properties and his former residence. The question now is when and if they formally charge him.
That's fair. At the time I thought it might be because they were struggling to deal with both the Andrew situation and the Harry drama simultaneously, while Charles was generally more unpopular than his mother, and likely ill.
But if they privately found out something that made the Andrew situation untenable, it makes sense that they would try to distance that ASAP. I wonder whether it's something that has been released already or is even worse.
Charles' statement today on "we support the police", plus letting them search The Lodge, definitely feels like they're leaving him to rot. At least maybe a little.
Where are you hearing that? The charge is misconduct in public office, and while the initial arrest for it has been made based on sharing documents, the penalty itself can have a maximum of life in prison. Life in prison won't happen, but given they've now searched 4 properties, I don't think he's getting away with just a fine either.
Maybe, I'm not so sure. I had thought they knew it was very likely the accusations were true, but they spent a lot of time sidestepping action. If public criticism hadn't been so relentless, they might have been content to sweep it under the rug, as is tradition.
But I have never kept close track of the royal family, largely because I always assumed they were untouchable.
They probably have to start small, it's unprecedented territory, and they'd want the proper charges to stick. I expect this also opens up the door to evidence gathering for the bigger charges.
Why would a group of countries that includes Iran try to get the US to bomb Iran? Is it perhaps more likely that the country which bombed it 6 months ago, whose leader Trump met with last week, would like it bombed? The country that's a major weapons importer from the US?
It does not say that or anything close to it.
The bots were given the exact same multiple choice questions with the same wording. The difference was the fake biography it had been given for the user prior to the question.