They took a gamble and tried to play the streaming game - and lost
Did any of y'all Roku owners buy their device for the purpose of their streaming content? I know I didn't - I bought it because of the promise of an excellent UI to organize all of my other already-existing-and-too-many services in an easy streamlined interface even my dad could use.
For me it was vise versa. If its purely by minutes, there's no way I watch more than 20 youtube videos a week, let's say 5 minutes length each would be barely 2 hour of content.
Versus on Netflix I can easily watch on average 1 episode a day (or binge 7 in 1 day :P) for at least 7 hours a week
So you'd essentially be proposing that we don't help
Excuse me? I haven't proposed anything. I'm simply asking questions because the headline/description seemed misleading to me and not adequately conveying the full story/situation. Purely from a math/stats/logic point of view
I'm wondering what is the percentage of homeless that are addicts or have mental health issues. You seem to be confident they are outliers, but what is the percentage? Is it 1%? 25%? 50%?
Seems like a logical fallacy to me without knowing that stat.
"The study did not include people who are street-entrenched or who have serious addictions or mental health issues"
Seems kind of disingenuous to leave out people who are addicted to alcohol or drugs. No, that's not most of them, but yes that is some of them.
The study simple ignores them so how can one make conclusions like "contrary to what people believe" and "the opposite of what people think" without actually considering the subject in question
Incidentally, these magic numbers of 111,111 are easy to remember by knowing some history: the French originally defined the meter so that 107 meters would be the distance along the Paris meridian from the equator to the north pole. Thus, 107 / 90 = 111,111.1 meters equals one degree of latitude to within the capabilities of French surveyors two centuries ago.
So its not just a coincidence, it was defined that way!
It should make you distrustful of politics, lawmakers, lobbyists, and capitalism not science itself. Pure science is unbiased and systematic, by definition.
Best espresso martini in town?