Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C
Posts
0
Comments
480
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • gasp

    Jump
  • Pretty good, however wtype is only sending keystrokes globally, with xdotool you can also move the mouse, send key events to specific windows and more.

  • gasp

    Jump
  • I think you can start two Wayland compositors, and change the compositor configuration to use different mice and outputs, but I never tried this.

  • gasp

    Jump
  • Yes, that is for X11. Now find one that works on all Wayland compositors, that doesn't require root permissions.

  • gasp

    Jump
  • I also switched to use different Wayland compositors many years ago for my main systems, but there are also still reasons to use X11. These are mine:

    • X11 forwarding, with that you can connect to another system via SSH (e.g. via ssh -Y) and just start a GUI app, and the window appears on your screen.
    • Sharing individual windows via WebRTC, with Wayland compositors you can normally only share full screens. Xserver allows applications to directly capture the window content of others.
    • Easily mirroring screens for presentations, with some Wayland compositors you have to capture one screen and then play it back on another screen, with X11 that is integrated into the xserver.
    • Automation and keyboard macros, with X11 it is much easier to automate keyboard macros and customize keyboard mapping than on Wayland. See Xmodmap, etc. Same for mouse input. That is also a reason why implementing remote control software is more difficult with Wayland, see for instance RustDesk support for Wayland (works now, but still a bit experimental).

    There might be some Wayland compositors that worked around that, but on X11 this was standard. But generally X11 provides these features for all WMs, and in Wayland they have to be implemented individually.

    And some just are not supposed to work, for security reasons.

    But all of this depends on your use-case. I sometimes even (can or have to) go without a Wayland compositor or X11 and render GUI directly via KMS/DRM.

  • gasp

    Jump
  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Well, it just depends on your use-case. Sometimes new games or applications require newer drivers or directly a newer Windows version. This is something you just have to be aware of.

    At least that was a reason I switched LTSC Windows over to Enterprise for some people.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • You might likely run into issues with GPU (and other) windows drivers, which might stop supporting old windows 10 versions. At least that happened already with LTSC/LTSB. I expect this to happen especially when ordinary windows 10 EOL is reached.

  • Yes, currently Valve is mostly interesting in a base system that just runs Steam and games, not a general Linux desktop. Commercial Linux distributions are more about servers and professional workstations.

    We either need PC hardware manufacturers or public funding to push Linux desktop, since I don't think that normal users would pay directly for a Linux system.

    PC hardware manufacturers however are more about selling the next device that constantly improving a system non-customers could also use for free, so I doubt they would commit to it fully, and instead use it for marketing.

    So all that is left is public funding.

  • I don't think that there is any one issue that hurts the Linux desktop, I think it is more a matter of death by a thousand cuts.

    I think for the Linux desktop to be (more) successful we need dedicated QA teams, with a direct connection to usability developers that constantly test and write automated tests for the whole integration on different hardware, and fix any issue as well.

  • Wasn't that already the case since 9/11 and the Patriot Act?

  • What? P2P is more hackable? Hacking just one central server is more difficult than hacking multiple P2P clients that check each other? That seems like strange reasoning. This really depends on the implementation, sure you can make it insecure, but you can also make it more secure.

    And why wouldn't you want to host your own games when you want to play them together with others?

    Hosting your own games also gives you much more power over it, you can mod it more easily etc.

    IMO game developers of multiplayer games should also have to release dedicated servers to anyone that buys their game, so that they are still able to play the game, even if the game developer shuts the servers down, or their country is embargoed by the country where the game developer is located.

  • You are inverting the logic there, all games on GoG are DRM free, but not all DRM free games are on GoG.

  • That is how it often works with personality cults. The dear leader cannot fail, it is the people beneath that didn't interpret the words or did the work correctly.

  • That is true, but it also isn't a counter argument to what I said.

    Just because the right-wing people are crazy and do not argue based on logic, but on confirmation-bias and personal preconceptions, doesn't mean that the reality itself has liberal bias. There are other ideologies that argue based on logic and observable facts, but are not 'liberal', many social-democrates (or democratic-socialists) for instance, IMO.

  • Good code documentation describes why something is done, and no just what or how.

    To answer why you have to understand the context, and often, you have to be there when the code was written and went through the various iterations.

    LLMs might be able to explain what is done, with some margin of error, but why something is done, I would be very surprised.

  • Nah, reality doesn't have a liberal bias. "Liberal" is something that humans invented, and not something that comes from reality or some intrinsic part of nature.

    LLMs are trained on past written stuff by humans, and humans for a long time have not been ridiculously right wing as the current political climate of the US.

    If you train a model on only right wing propaganda, it will not miraculously turn "liberal", it will be right wing. LLMs also argue not more logical than any propagandist, if they were fed by only propaganda.

    I dislike it immensely when people argue that LLMs are truthful, unbiased, or somehow "know" or can create more that what was put into them. And connecting them with fundamental reality seems even more tech-bro-brained.

    Arguing that "reality" is this or that is also very annoying, because reality doesn't have any intrisic morales or politics that can be measured by logic or science. So many people argue that their morales are better then someone else's, because they where given by god, or by science, this is bullshit. They are all derived by human society, and the same is true by whatever "liberal" means.

    And lastly, assuming that some system somehow is "built into reality" shuts down any critique of the system. And critiquing any system in order to improve it is essential for any improvements, which should be part of any progressive thought.

  • I would agree about getting buying the cheaper version, if it doesn't also might mean buying an EOL product.

    If Nintendo stops providing updates and new games of the old switch (soonish) then (what I suspect from console gaming) then suggesting to buy the old product from Nindendo looks like they just want to empty their Switch 1 stockpile.

    If Nintendo just treats the Switch 1 and 2 as the same console, with just different performance and price, but get the same support period and games, then I am fully with you.

  • Am I the only one that thinks PoE stands for Pillars of Eternity (and Power over Ethernet) and gets confused?

  • I think you are mixing up SFP and optical fiber. SFP modules with copper wires exist, and are common. (e.g. SFP 1000base-T modules)

    You can also use optical fiber without SFP, like the toslink connection.

    Optical fiber also has issues with requiring a larger minimal bend radius, because they easily break. So you have to handle them more carefully.