Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A
Posts
2
Comments
140
Joined
5 mo. ago

  • I think it still supports Google. If someone wants a Pixel and one less is available second hand, thats one more person buying it in store. Probably not 1:1 relationship there, but still.

  • It might actually be Georgist, cause if you remove housing (i.e. land) from the equation, the statement is no longer true. At least in a 2014 study by Rognlie.

  • Fun fact, when you remove real estate from that calculations, the claim is no longer true (Rognlie, 2014). Land is a severely underrated cause of this. Edit: citation: https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2016.0002

  • Hmm, in mean time I prefer buying Fairphone over supporting Google.

  • I see, and it can’t be installed on Fairphone?

  • So if I were to choose graphene over eOS it would mainly be to be more protected from malware?

  • But here we are talking about the guys being paid to do something immoral.

  • Thanks for sharing. For someone who is not so well versed in these technicalities, what does that mean for the user? That you’re more susceptible to fraud and hacking and malware?

  • Valid point, but isn’t having moral principles part of what constitutes not being dumb? Or having the knowledge to understand it as immoral?

  • Fred

  • What maskes you want Graphene over e/OS? I’m not so familiar with how they feel.

  • One of the many good cases for land value taxes

  • House prices are soaring because supply is being suppressed while demand is being stimulated while all locations have unique locational supply of land that creates small location monopolies.

  • Great, and I also hear that the amount of nuclear waste is tiny in comparison to contemporary nuclear reactors.

  • Alright, the more you know

  • For example when Russia invaded Ukraine and they attacked Chernobyl. Maybe it’s not founded in real risk. But I imagine it could be a security threat for someone to bomb a nuclear facility.

  • That’s my point. The social benefit of renewables are environmentally and temporally differentiating. It doesn’t mean we shouldn’t invest in them! We definitely should, and likely more than we do. But all I’m saying if you were to calculate the environmental and societal long run costs, I believe there must be places and situations where fission/fusion is preferred sometimes.

  • Thanks for sharing!

  • I’m not saying they are bad or not preferred. I’m just saying there are cases for fusion/fission sometimes.