Right you didn't have an issue with that statement yesterday, and now you're making some wild assumptions and accusations about my beliefs in an attempt to further fish for an argument.

Anyway I also addressed many of you points yesterday. Here I can quote it again since you forgot.

Attempts to remove a dictator by force are usually not possible without a lengthy occupation. There's no new government or leaders ready to form a new government that is better for the Iranian people. An occupation is also unlikely to have good results. This isn't reforming Nazi Germany or Imperial Japan, this is something else entirely. I would expect the people of Iran to not respond well to aggressors occupying their country. This is at best Afghanistan 2, but likely worse

I think this sums up my fears well. I don't think the United States should be sending people to die, or bombing schools, to end this regime. Odds are based on the US track record it will be ineffective or worse for the Iranian people. The US has a record of replacing a dictator with even worse US friendly dictators. Not to mention if the regime doesn't fall this will be a bloody campaign, the bombs alone can easily kill more than 30,000 Iranians.

Sorry I don't want my country to play world police anymore. We're bad at it, it's expensive, and too many people die every time